JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Risk Critical Point (RCP): A Quantifying Safety-Based Method Developed to Screen Construction Safety Risks
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Risk Critical Point (RCP): A Quantifying Safety-Based Method Developed to Screen Construction Safety Risks
Soltanmohammadi, Mehdi; Saberi, Morteza; Yoon, Jin Hee; Soltanmohammadi, Khatereh; Pazhoheshfar, Peiman;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Risk assessment is an important phase of risk management. It is the stage in which risk is measured thoroughly to achieve effective management. Some factors such as probability and impact of risk have been used in the literature related to construction projects. Because in high-rise projects safety issues are paramount, this study has tried to develop a quantifying technique that takes into account three factors: probability, impact and Safety Performance Index (SPI) where the SPI is defined as the capability of an appropriate response to reduce or limit the effect of an event after its occurrence with regard to safety pertaining to a project. Regarding risk-related literatures which cover an uncertain subject, the proposed method developed in this research is based on a fuzzy logic approach. This approach entails a questionnaire in which the subjectivity and vagueness of responses is dealt with by using triangular fuzzy numbers instead of linguistic terms. This method returns a Risk Critical Point (RCP) on a zoning chart that places risks under categories: critical, critical-probability, critical-impact, and non-critical. The high-rise project in the execution phase has been taken as a case study to confirm the applicability of the proposed method. The monitoring results showed that the RCP method has the inherent ability to be extended to subsequent applications in the phases of risk response and control.
 Keywords
Risk Assessment;Safety Performance Index (SPI);Fuzzy Logic;Risk Critical Point (RCP);
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Aneziris, O. N., Papazoglou, I. A., and Kallianiotis, D. (2010), Occupational risk of tunneling construction, Safety Science, 48, 964-972. crossref(new window)

2.
Aneziris, O. N., Topali, E., and Papazoglou, I. A. (2011), Occupational risk of building construction, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, doi:10.1016/ j.ress.2011.11.003. crossref(new window)

3.
Baker, S., Ponniah, D., and Smith, S. (1999), Risk response techniques employed currently for major projects, Construction Management and Economics, London, 7(2), 205-213.

4.
Caponecchia, C. and Sheils, I. (2011), Perceptions of personal vulnerability to workplace hazards in the Australian construction industry, Journal of Safety Research, 42, 253-258. crossref(new window)

5.
Carbonari, A., Giretti, A., and Naticchia, B. (2011), A proactive system for real-time safety management in construction sites, Automation in Construction, 20, 686-698. crossref(new window)

6.
Chapman, R. J. (2001), The controlling influences on effective risk identification and assessment for construction design management, International Journal of Project Management, 19, 147-160. crossref(new window)

7.
Chenyun and Zichun, Y. (2012), The BP Artificial Neural Network Model on Expressway Construction Phase Risk, Systems Engineering Procedia, 4, 409-415. crossref(new window)

8.
Deng, Y., Sadiq, R., Jiang, W., and Tesfamariam, S. (2011), Risk analysis in a linguistic environment: A fuzzy evidential reasoning-based approach, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 15438-15446. crossref(new window)

9.
El-Sayegh, S. M. (2007), Risk assessment and allocation in the UAE construction industry, International Journal of Project Management, doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.07.004. crossref(new window)

10.
Fouladgar, M. M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., and Zavadska, E. K. (2012), Risk evaluation of tunneling projects, International Journal of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 12, 1-12. crossref(new window)

11.
Fung, I. W. H., Lo, T. Y., and Tung, K. C. F. (2011), Tung Towards a better reliability of risk assessment: Development of a qualitative and quantitative risk evaluation model (Q2REM) for different trades of construction works in Hong Kong, International Journal of Accident Analysis and Prevention, AAP-2470.

12.
Fung, I. W. H., Tam, V. W. Y., Lo, T. Y., and Lu. L. L. H. (2010), Developing a Risk Assessment Model for construction safety, International Journal of Project Management, 28, 593-600. crossref(new window)

13.
Gangolells, M., Casals, M., Forcada, N., Roca, X., and Fuertes, A. (2010), Mitigating construction safety risks using prevention through design, Journal of Safety Research, 41, 107-122. crossref(new window)

14.
Guofeng, W., Min W., and Weiwei, Z. (2011), Study on the Existing Problems and Countermeasures of Project Risk Management in China, Energy Procedia, 13, 2726-2733. crossref(new window)

15.
Gurcanli, G. E. and Mungen, U. (2008), An occupational safety risk analysis method at construction sites using fuzzy sets, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, doi:10,1016/j.ergon.2008.10.006.

16.
Kaming, P. F., Olomolaiye, P. O., Holt, G. D., and Harris, F. C. (1997), Factors influencing construction time and cost overruns on high-rise projects in Indonesia, Construction Management and Economics, 15, 83-94. crossref(new window)

17.
KarimiAzari, A., Mousavi, N., Mousavi, S. F., and Hosseini, S. B. (2011), Risk assessment model selection in construction industry, Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 9105-9111. crossref(new window)

18.
Kucukali, S. (2011), Risk assessment of river-type hydropower plants using fuzzy logic approach, Energy Policy, 39, 6683-6688. crossref(new window)

19.
Lee, A. H. I. (2009), A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks, Expert systems with Applications, 36, 2879-2893. crossref(new window)

20.
Lee, L. W. and Chen, S. M. (2008), Fuzzy risk analysis based on fuzzy numbers with different shapes and different deviations, Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 2763-2771. crossref(new window)

21.
Lin, W., Yaqi, L., and Enmao, W. (2011), Research on Risk Management of Railway Engineering Construction, Systems Engineering Procedia, 1, 174-180. crossref(new window)

22.
Mohammad, S., Mojtahedi , H., Mousavi, S. M., and Makui, A. (2010), Project risk identification and assessment simultaneously using multi-attribute group decision making technique, Safety Science, 48, 499-507. crossref(new window)

23.
Nieto-Morote, A. and Ruz-Vila, F. (2011), A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment, International Journal of Project Management, 29, 220-231. crossref(new window)

24.
Pinto, A., Nunes, I. L., and Ribeiro, R. A. (2011), Occupational risk assessment in construction industry-Overview and reflection, Safety Science, 49, 616-624. crossref(new window)

25.
Roisenberg, M., Schoeninger, C., and da Silva, R. R. (2009), A hybrid fuzzy-probabilistic system for risk analysis in petroleum exploration prospects, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 6282-6294. crossref(new window)

26.
Saifullah, N. M. and Ismail, F. (2012), Integration of Occupational Safety and Health during Preconstruction Stage in Malaysia, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 603-610. crossref(new window)

27.
Sousa, R. and Einstein, H. H. (2012), Risk analysis during tunnel construction using Bayesian Networks: Porto Metro case Study, Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 27, 86-100. crossref(new window)

28.
Stroeve, H. S., Blom, H. A. P., and Bakker, G. J. (2009), Systemic accident risk assessment in air traffic by Monte Carlo simulation, Safety Science, 47, 238-249. crossref(new window)

29.
Xiao-mei, G. and Xiao-jun, L. (2011), Application of Entropy Measurement in Risk Assessment of the Engineering Project of Construction-agent System, Systems Engineering Procedia, 1, 244-249. crossref(new window)

30.
Xu, Y., Yeung, J. F. Y., Chan, A. P. C., Chan, D. W. M., Wang, S. Q., and Ke, Y. (2010), Developing a risk assessment model for PPP projects in China-A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach, Automation in Construction, 19, 929-943. crossref(new window)

31.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965), Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353. crossref(new window)

32.
Zayed, T., Amer, M., and Pan, J. (2007), Assessing risk and uncertainty inherent in Chinese highway projects using AHP, International Journal of project management, doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.05.12.