An Analysis of Pre-service Teachers` Pedagogical Content Knowledge about Story Problem for Division of Fractions

Title & Authors
An Analysis of Pre-service Teachers` Pedagogical Content Knowledge about Story Problem for Division of Fractions
Noh, Jihwa; Ko, Ho Kyoung; Huh, Nan;

Abstract
This study examined pre-service teachers` pedagogical content knowledge of fraction division in a context where they were asked to write a story problem for a symbolic expression illustrating a whole number divided by a proper fraction. Problem-posing is an important instructional strategy with the potential to create meaningful contexts for learning mathematical concepts, especially when real-world applications are intended. In this study, story problems written by 135 elementary pre-service teachers were analyzed with respect to mathematical correctness. error types, and division models. Patterns and tendencies in elementary pre-service teachers` knowledge of fraction division were identified. Implicaitons for teaching and teacher education are discussed.
Keywords
story probelm;division of fractions;PCK;
Language
Korean
Cited by
1.
반성적 문제 만들기 활동이 초등학생들의 문제해결력 및 수학적 태도에 미치는 영향,배준환;박만구;

한국초등수학교육학회지, 2016. vol.20. 2, pp.311-331
References
1.
방정숙.이지영 (2009a). 사례연구를 통한 분수 나눗셈의 연산 감각 분석. 학교수학 11(1), 71-91.(Park, J. S. & Lee, J. Y. (2009a). An Analysis of Operation Sense in Division of Fraction Based on Case Study. School Mathematics 11(1), 71-91.)

2.
방정숙.이지영 (2009b). 분수의 곱셈과 나눗셈에 관한 초등학교 수학과 교과용 도서 분석. 학교수학 11(4), 723-743(Park, J. S. & Lee, J. Y. (2009b). An Analysis of the Multiplication and Division of Fractions in Elementary Mathematics Instructional Meterials. School Mathematics 11(4). 723-743)

3.
서관석.전경순 (2000). 예비 초등 교사들의 분수 연산에 관한 내용적 지식과 교수학적 지식 수준에 대한 연구 - 교사교육적 관점. 수학교육학연구 10(1), 103-113.(Seo, K. S. & Jeon K. (2000). A Study on Elementary Preservice Teachers' Subject Matter Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Fraction-related Operations: A Teacher Education Perspective. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 10(1), 103-113.)

4.
이미경 외 (2004). PISA 2003 결과 분석 연구-수학적 소양, 읽기 소양, 과학적 소양 수준 및 배경변인 분석. 연구보고RRE 2004-2-1. 한국교육과정평가원.(Lee, M. K., et al. (2004). The PISA 2003 Results-An Analysis of performances and influences on Mathematical Literacy, Reading Proficiency, Scientific Literacy. Report, RRE 2004-2-1. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Education.)

5.
이미경 외 (2007). OECD/PISA 평가틀 및 공개 문항 분석. 한국교육과정평가원. 연구자료 ORM 2007-24.(Lee, M. K., et al. (2007). An Analysis of the Assessment Rubric for and Released Items of OECD/PISA. Report, ORM 2007-24. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Education.)

6.
이재학.정상권.김선희.최민식.원유미.김영진, 고호경 (2013). 스토리텔링을 활용한 중학교 기하영역 자료 개발 연구. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈E <수학교육 논문집> 27(3), 341-356.(Lee, J. H., Chung, S. K., Kim, S. H., Choi, M. S., Won,, Y. M., Kim, Y. J., & Ko, H. K. (2013). Development of Meterial for Middle School Geometry using Storytelling. Communications of Mathematical Education 27(3). 235-249.)

7.
임청환 (2003). 과학 교과교육학 지식의 본질과 발달. 한국지구과학회지 24(4), 235-249.(Lim, C. H. (2003). Nature and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Teaching. The Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society 24(4), 235-249.)

8.
조지민.김수진.이상하.김미영.옥현진.임해미 (2011). 2011년 국제 학업성취도 평가 연구(PISS/TIMSS) : TIMSS 2011 본검사 시행보고서, 연구보고 RRE 2011-4-1. 한국교육과정평가원.(Cho, J. M., Kim, S. J., Lee, S. H., Kim, M. Y., Ok, H. J., & Lim, H. M. (2011). The 2011 International Academic Achievements Tests (PISS/TIMSS): An Administration Report of the 2011 TIMSS. Report, RRE 2011-4-1. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Education.)

9.
Ball, D. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers' understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 132-144.

10.
Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade and how can we decide? American Educator 29, 14-22, 43-46.

11.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education 59(5), 389-407.

12.
Barlow, A. T., & Cates, J. M. (2006). The impact of problem posing on elementary teachers' beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching. School Science and Mathematics 106(2), 64-73.

13.
Baroody, J., & Coslick, R. T. (1998). Fostering Children's Mathenatical Power: An Investigative Approach to K-8 Mathematics Instruction. Mahwha, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

14.
Chapman, O. (2006). Classroom practices for context of mathematics word problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics 62, 211-230.

15.
Cobb, P., T. Wood, & E. Yackel(1993). Discourse mathematical thinking and classroom practice. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone, (Eds.), Contexts for learning. New York: Oxford University Press.

16.
Cobb, P., T. Wood, T., Yackel E., Nicholls, J., Wheatley, G., Trigatti, B., & Perlwitz, M.(1991). Assessment of a Problem-Centered Second-Grade Mathematics Project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22, 3-29.

17.
Crespo, S. (2003). Learning to pose mathematical problems: Exploring changes in pre-service teachers' practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics 52(3), 243-270.

18.
Lee, S., Brown, R. E., & Orrill, C. H. (2011) Mathematics Teachers' Reasoning About Fractions and Decimals Using Drawn Representations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 13(3), 198-220.

19.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers'understanding s of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

20.
McAllister, C., & Beaver, C. (2012). Identification of error types in preservice teachers' attempts to create fraction story problems for specified operations. School Science & Mathematics 112(2), 88-98.

21.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foun dations for success: The final report of the Natio nal Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, D C: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf

22.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Authur.

23.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

24.
Rittle-Johnson, B., & Koedinger, K. R. (2005). Designing knowledge scaffolds to support mathematical problem solving. Cognition and Instruction 23(3), 313-349.

25.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review 57, 1-22.

26.
Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 3(2), 115-163.

27.
Thompson, P. W., & Saldanha, L. A. (2003). Fractions and multiplicative reasoning. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 95-113) . Reston, VA: NCTM.

28.
Tirosh, D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers' knowledge of children's conceptions: The case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 31, 5-25.

29.
Toluk-Ucar, Z. (2009). Developing preservice teachers understanding of fractions through problem posing. Teaching and Teacher Education 25(1), 166-175.

30.
Vygotsky(1978). Mind in Society : The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

31.
Whitin, D. J. (2004). Building a mathematical community through problem posing. In R. N. Rubenstein (Ed.), Perspectives on the teaching of mathematics: Sixty-sixth yearbook (pp. 129-140). Reston, VA: NCTM.