JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Mathematics Instruction Based on Constructivism on Learners` Knowledge Generation Level and Reasoning Ability - Focusing on 4th Grade Fraction
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Mathematics Instruction Based on Constructivism on Learners` Knowledge Generation Level and Reasoning Ability - Focusing on 4th Grade Fraction
Lee, Eungsuk; Kim, Jinho;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The purpose of this research is to find the effects of learner-centered instruction based on constructivism (LCIC) on their knowledge generation level and reasoning ability. To look for them, after fraction units are re-planed for implementing LCIC, instructions using it provide students in a class. From the data, some conclusions can be drawn as follows: LCIC has more positive influence of students on recall ability, generation ability, and reasoning ability than tractional instruction method. With the data it can be said that the interaction exists between learners` reasoning ability and generation level.
 Keywords
Learner-centered instruction;Constructivism;Reasoning ability;Knowledge generation;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
김경미.황우형 (2009). 분수의 덧셈과 뺄셈에 대한 아동의 이해 분석. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육 논문집> 23(3), 707-734.(Kim, K. & Whang, W. (2009). The analysis of children's understanding of addition and subtraction of tractions. Communications of Mathematics Education 23(3), 707-734.)

2.
강인애 (1997). 왜 구성주의인가. 서울: 문음사.(Kang, I. (1997). Why is constructivism? Seoul: Moonumsa.)

3.
교육과학기술부 (2014). 초등학교 수학과 교사용 지도서 4-1. 서울: 두산동아(주).(Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2014). 4-1 Mathematics textbook: Teachers' manual. Seoul: Doosan(Ju).)

4.
김민환 (1997). 실제적 교육방법론. 서울: 양서원.(Kim, M. (1997). Practical educational methods. Seoul: Yangseowon.)

5.
김옥경 (1997). 초등학교 6학년 학생들의 분수 개념 이해 및 분수 수업방안에 대한 연구. 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문.(Kim, O. (1997). A study on conceptual understanding of fractions for 6th graders and instructional methods for fractions. Unpublished master thesis in Korea National University of Education.)

6.
김진호 (1994). 초등학교 2학년 아동의 곱셈구구에 의해 생성된 지식 수준 분석. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.(Kim, J. (1994). An analysis of knowledge level generated by multiplication facts on 2nd grade children. Unpublished master thesis in Korea National University of Education.)

7.
김진호 (2014). 학습자 중심 수학 수업을 위한 수업자료. 과학수학교육연구 37, 169-185.(Kim, J. (2014). Instructional materials for learner-centered mathematics instruction. The Research of Science-Mathematics Education 37, 169-185.)

8.
김진호.김상미 (2013). 구성주의 입장에서 보는 학습자 중심의 수학 교수.학습. 김진호, 장경윤, 한인기, 고호경 (편저), 구성주의와 한국수학교육 (pp. 45-64). 서울: 경문사.(Kim, J. & Kim, S. (2013). Learner-centered mathematics teaching and learning from the perspective of constructivism. In J. Kim, K. Kyung, I. Han, & H. Ko (Eds.), Constructivism and Korea Mathematics Education (pp. 45-64). Seoul: Kyungmoonsa.)

9.
김진호.김인경 (2010). GSP를 활용한 도형학습이 수학학업성취도 및 추론능력에 미치는 영향. East Asian Mathematical Journal 26(2), 463-485.(Kim, J. & Kim, I. (2010). Effects of figures learning using GSP on mathematics achievement and reasoning ability. East Asian Mathematical Journal 26(2), 463-485.)

10.
김진호.이소민.김상룡 (2010). 학습자 중심 수업이 학습자들의 성취도에 미치는 영향. 한국초등수학교육학회지 14(1), 136-151.(Kim, J., Lee. S., & Kim, S. (2010). Achievement of students who have learner-centered instruction for multiplication units. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea 14(1), 136-151.)

11.
김진호.이재기 (2012). 수학 수업의 일부 국면에 나타나는 수업의 실제에 대한 일 논의. East Asian Mathematical Journal 28(2), 233-249.(Kim, J. & Lee, J. (2012). An discussion on instructional practices revealing in some aspects of mathematics instruction. East Asian Mathematical Journal 28(2), 233-249.) crossref(new window)

12.
김태향.김진호 (2010). 구성주의에 바탕을 둔 학습자중심 수업을 받은 학생들의 학업성취도. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 C <초등수학교육> 13(2), 67-84.(Kim, T. & Kim, J. (2010). Effects of math lessons based on constructivism ideas on learners' achievement. Education of Primary School Mathematics 13(2), 67-84.)

13.
김해숙 (2002). 중학교 기초 학습 부진아를 위한 분수학습-지도 자료 개발. 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.(Kim, H. (2002). Development of learning and instruction material in fraction for underachievers in middle school. Unpublished master thesis in Ewha Womans University of Education.)

14.
나귀수 (2009). 초등학교 교사의 수학 수업비평의 특징에 대한 연구. 학교수학 11(4), 583-605.(Na, G. (2009). A study on the characteristics of mathematics class-criticism by elementary teachers. School Mathematics 11(4), 583-605.)

15.
나귀수(2010). 초등학교 수학 수업 학습공동체 활동에 대한 연구. 수학교육학연구 20(3), 373-395.(Na, G. (2010). Reporting the activities of learning community on elementary mathematics lesson. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 20(3), 373-395.)

16.
노경희 (1998). 구성 중심 수업이 학습자의 학업성취, 학습흥미 및 학습전이에 미는 효과. 충남대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.(Roh, K. (1998). The effect of constructivistic instruction on academic achievement, interest and transfer of learning. Unpublished master thesis in Chungnam National University.)

17.
박경미 (2007). 수학 수업을 바라보는 두 가지 시각-교사의 관점과 학생의 관점. 학교수학 9(2), 259-276.(Park, K. (2007). Two views on the mathematics lessons: Teacher's perspective and students' perspective. School Mathematics 9(2), 259-276.)

18.
박성선 (1993). 국민학교 4학년 아동들의 논리적 추론에서의 정교화 효과. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.(Park, S. (1993). The effect of elaboration on logical reasoning of 4th-grade children. Unpublished master thesis in Korea National University of Education.)

19.
박정임 (2001). 분수의 나눗셈 개념에 관한 연구. 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문.(Park, J. (2001). A study on concept of fractional division. Unpublished master thesis in Korea National University of Education.)

20.
배지현 (2005). 반성적 추상화 학습이 학업성취 및 전이에 미치는 효과. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.(Bae, J. (2005). The effect of reflective abstraction learning on the academic achievement and transfer. Unpublished master thesis in Korea National University of Education.)

21.
서동엽 (2005). 분수의 역사 발생적 지도 방안. 수학교육학연구 10(1), 103-113.(Seo, D. (2005). The historico-Genetic instruction on fraction. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 10(1), 103-113.)

22.
송창규 (2013). 초등학교 6학년 학생들의 분수계산 수행능력과 분수계산 개념이해정도. 경인교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.(Song, C. (2013). The 6th grade display of fraction calculating and concepts. Unpublished master thesis in Gyeongin National University of Education.)

23.
신준식 (1996). 실제적 접근 방법에 의한 분수 교수학습에 대한 연구. 한국교원대학교 대학원 미간행 박사학위논문.(Shin, J. (1996). A study on the teaching and learning of fraction based on the realistic approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation in Korea National University of Education.)

24.
양미경 (2002). 교육과정의 성격에 대한 구성주의 관점의 시사. 교육과정연구 20(1), 1-26.(Yang, M. (2002). Exploring the characteristics of curriculum: A constructivistic point of view. The Journal of Curriculum Studies 20(1), 1-26.)

25.
오성환 (2000). 퀴즈네어 막대를 활용한 분수 계산 학습 프로그램의 적용 효과. 한국 교원대학교 석사학위 논문.(Oh, S. (2000). A study on effectiveness of a fraction operation program using Cuisenaire Rods. Unpublished master thesis in Korea National University of Education.)

26.
오유경.김진호 (2009). 분수 개념에 대한 초등학생들의 비형식적 지식 분석. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육논문집> 23(1), 145-174.(Oh, Y. & Kim, J. (2009). Analysis of informal fraction concepts first to third graders have already established. Communications of Mathematical Education 23(1), 145-174.)

27.
이대현 (2007). 초등수학에서 분수에 관한 교수학적 내용 지식 개발 연구. 한국학교수학회논문집 10(2), 149-171.(Lee, D. (2007). A study on the development of pedagogical content knowledge on fraction in the elementary school mathematics. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society 10(1), 149-174.)

28.
이종욱 (2005). 분수에 대한 교사지식 변화에 대한 연구. 한국교원대학교 대학원 미간행 박사학위논문.(Lee, J. (2005). A study on transition of teacher knowledge of fraction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation in Korea National University of Education)

29.
장상호 (2000). 교육적 인식론이란 무엇인가: 학문과 교육(하). 서울: 서울대학교 출판부.(Jang, S. (2000). What is educational epistemology? Academy and education(II). Seoul: Seoul National University Press.)

30.
장숙희 (2009). 분수의 사칙 연산이 적용되는 문장제 해결의 장애 유형 분석. 서울교육대학교 석사학위논문.(Jang, S. (2009). An analysis on the obstacles in the word problem solving related to fraction. Unpublished master thesis in Seoul National University of Education.)

31.
정현실.김진호 (2013). 구성주의 수학 수업이 추론능력에 미치는 영향 : 초등학교 2학년 곱셈을 중심으로. 한국학교수학회논문집 16(1), 31-61.(Jung, H. & Kim, J. (2013). Effects of mathematical instructions based on constructivism on learners' reasoning ability: With focus on the area of multiplication for 2nd graders. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society 16(1), 31-61.)

32.
조수윤.김진호 (2011). 구성주의 수학 수업이 추론능력에 미치는 영향 : 초등학교 3학년 나눗셈을 중심으로. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 C <초등수학교육> 14(2), 165-185.(Cho, S. & Kim, J. (2011). Effects of mathematical instructions based on constructivism on learners' reasoning ability. Education of Primary School Mathematics 14(2), 165-185.)

33.
조영남 (1998). 구성주의 교수-학습. 초등교육연구논총 12, 93-122.(Cho, Y. (1998). Teaching and learning based on constructivism. Journal of Elementary Education 12, 93-122.)

34.
최승현.황혜정(2004). 제7차 수학과 교육과정 운영에 관한 실태 분석 연구. 학교수학 6(2), 213-233.(Cho1, S. & Hwang, H. (2004). A study on implementation of the seventh mathematics curriculum at the elementary school level. School Mathematics 6(2), 213-233.)

35.
최영주 (2005). 초등학교 학생들의 분수 오개념 분석 및 분수 개념 형성 지도방안. 전주교육대학교 교육대학원 미간행 석사학위논문.(Choi, Y. (2005). A study on the teaching methods of fractions concept through the analysis of misconcepts of fractions. Unpublished master thesis in Jeon-ju National University of Education.)

36.
홍은숙 (2007). 분수개념에 관한 비형식적 지식 분석. 서울교육대학교 교육대학원 미간행 석사학위논문.(Hong, E. (2007). The informal knowledge of elementary school students about the concepts of fraction. Unpublished master thesis in Seoul National University of Education.)

37.
황윤한 (1995). 제6차 교육과정과 구성주의적 교육. 교육학 연구 33(1), 237-252.(Hwang, Y. (1995). The sixth curriculum and constructivist education. Journal of Education Research 33(1), 237-252.)

38.
황윤한 (2001). 수업의 구성주의적 접근. 열린교육실행연구 4, 1-47.(Hwang, Y. (2001). Constructivist approach of instruction. The Journal of Yeolin Education Implementation Research 4, 1-47.)

39.
Baroody, A. J., & Coslick, R. T. (1998). Fostering children's mathematical power: An investigative approach to K-8 mathematics instruction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

40.
Boaler, J. (2008). What's math got to do with it? How parents and teachers can help children learn to love their least favorite subject. London: Penguin Books.

41.
Brown, G. & Quinn, R. J. (2007). Investigating the relationship between fraction proficiency and success in algebra. Australian Mathematics Teacher 63(4), 8-15.

42.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18, 32-42.

43.
Burns, M. (2001), Lessons for introducing multiplication, Grade 3. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.

44.
Burns, M. (2001). Teaching arithmetic: Lessons for introducing fractions to grades 4-5. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.

45.
Carpenter, T, P. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and leaning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

46.
Chapin, S. H., O'Connor, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2013). Classroom discussions in math: A teacher's guide for using talk moves to support the Common Core and more, Grades K-6: A multimedia professional learning resource (3rd Ed). Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.

47.
Cheek, D. W. (1992). Thinking constructively about science, technology and society education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

48.
Collins, A. Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1988). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

49.
Cunningham, D. J. (1992). Assessing constructions and constructing assessments: A dialogue. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 35-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

50.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.

51.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.

52.
Duffy, T. M. & Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. Educational Technology 31(5), 7-12.

53.
Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D. (1999). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

54.
Forman, G. & Pufall, P. B. (Eds.). (1988). Constructivism in the computer age. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

55.
Fosnot, C. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 8-33). New York: Teachers College Press.

56.
Honebein, P. (1996). Seven goals for the design of constructivist learning environments. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 11-24). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, Inc.

57.
Hope, F. A., & Owens, D. T. (1987). Analysis is of the difficulty of learning fractions. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 9(4), 25-40.

58.
Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Evaluating constructivistic learning. Educational Technology 31(9), 28-33.

59.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

60.
Maddux, C. D., Johnson, D. L., & Willis, & J. W. (1997). Educational computing: Learning with tomorrow's technologies. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

61.
Meyer-Smith, J. A. & Mitchell, I. J. (1997). Teaching about constructivism: Using approaches informed by constructivism. In V Richardson. (Ed) Constructivist teacher education (pp. 129-153). Bristol: Falmer Press.

62.
NCTM (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematic. Reston: The author.

63.
NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The author.

64.
Perkins, D. N. (1991). Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage? Educational Technology 31(5), 18-23.

65.
Perkins, D. N. (1992). Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage? In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 45-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

66.
Prawat, R. S. (1992). Teacher's beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education 100(3), 354-395. crossref(new window)

67.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

68.
Rey, R. E., Suydam, M. N., Limdquist, M. M, & Smith, N. L. (1999). 초등 수학 학습 지도의 이해. (강문봉 외 18 역). 서울: 양서원. (영어 원작은 1998 출판)

69.
Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (1995). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135-148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, Inc.

70.
Skemp, R. R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

71.
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

72.
Tudge, J. R. H. & Winterhoff, P. A. (1993). Vygotsky, Piaget, and Bandura: Perspectives on the relations between the social world and cognitive development. Human Development 36(2), 61-82. crossref(new window)

73.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1987). The construction of knowledge: Contributions to conceptual semantics. Salinas, CA: Intersystems Publications.

74.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Syntheses 80, 121-140. crossref(new window)

75.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: The Falmer press.

76.
Willis, J. (1995). A recursive, reflective instructional design model based on constructivist-interpretivist theory. Educational Technology 35(6), 5-23.

77.
Yager, R. E. (1991). The constructivist learning model. Science Teacher 56(6), 52-57.

78.
Yager, R. E. (1993). What research says to the science teacher (Volume 7): The science, technology, society movement. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.

79.
Yager, R. E. (1996). New trends in science education in the elementary school. 광주교육대학교 초등교육연구소 주최 국제학술 심포지움 자료. (pp. 72-109).