JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
An Analysis of Mathematics Instruction for Professional Development of Elementary School Teachers for Gifted
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
An Analysis of Mathematics Instruction for Professional Development of Elementary School Teachers for Gifted
Kim, MinJeong; Pang, JeongSuk;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Despite the recent increasing interest in classroom expertise of teachers for gifted there has been lack of research on exploring or analyzing the components of classes for gifted tailored to the characteristics of each subject matter Given this, this study looked for the components of performance domain of classes for gifted in mathematics and then analyzed one teacher`s 12 lessons in terms of the components. The features of the lessons included the establishment of classroom atmosphere by considering the characteristics of mathematically gifted students, the introduction of or expansion to mathematically enriched tasks, promotion to mathematically higher thinking, and emphasis of mathematical pattern, connections, and utility. This study is expected for researchers to provide a practical case on how to analyze elementary classes for gifted in mathematics. It also helps teachers who teach gifted students to develop professional vision of mathematics instruction and to increase their classroom expertise.
 Keywords
Elementary classes for gifted in mathematics;teacher expertise;analysis of instruction;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
강영란 (2013). T1-73 계산기를 활용한 초등 5학년 수학 영재 학급의 수업 분석. 한국수학교육학회 시리즈 C <초등수학교육>, 16(3), 315-331. (Kang, Y. R. (2013). An analysis of using T1-73 calculator for the 5th grade students in an elementary math gifted class. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 16(3), 315-331.)

2.
강현영 (2014). 중등예비수학교사의 수업 능력 향상을 위한 교수-학습 포트폴리오 활용방안 연구. 학교수학, 16(3), 567-584. (Kang, H. Y. (2014). A study on utilization of teaching-learning portfolio for improvement of teaching competency of pre-service mathematics teacher. School Mathematics, 16(3), 567-584.)

3.
곽영순․최승현․장경숙 (2012). 수업컨설팅 활성화를 위한 매뉴얼 개발-수학, 과학, 영어 교과를 중심으로. 한국교육과정평가원 2012-23. (Kwak, Y. S., Choi, S. H. & Jang, G. S. (2012). Research on the manual development for activating teaching consulting in mathematics, science, english. KICE 2012-23.)

4.
교육부 (2014). 영재교육 진흥법. Retrieved from http://www.moe.go.kr/web/100092/law/list.do (Ministry of Education (2014). Promotion of gifted education. Retrieved from http://www.moe.go.kr/web/100092/law/list.do)

5.
김미환․송상헌 (2011). Flanders 언어상호작용분석 프로그램을 이용한 초등수학영재 수업에서의 교사 발언 사례 분석. 한국초등수학교육학회지, 15(2), 385-415. (Kim, M. H. & Song, S. H. (2011). Analysis on teacher's discourse in math gifted class in elementary schools using Flanders interaction analysis program. Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education, 15(2), 385-415.)

6.
김민정․류성림 (2007). 수학영재의 특성에 관한 사례 연구. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 C <초등수학교육>, 10(1), 41-56. (Kim, M. J. & Ryu, S. R. (2007). A case study on characteristics of the mathematics gifted children. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 10(1), 41-56.)

7.
나귀수 (2010). 초등학교 수학 수업 학습공동체 활동 에 대한 연구. 수학교육학연구, 20(3), 373-395. (Na, G. S. (2010). Reporting the activities of learning community on elementary mathematics lesson. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 20(3), 373-395.)

8.
D광역시과학교육원 (2013). 영재교육실무편람. (DISE (2013). Practical handbook of gifted education.)

9.
D광역시교육청 (2013). 초등학교 수업연구교사제 운영 계획 안내. (DGE (2013). Planning guidance of elementary class research teacher system.)

10.
박광순 (2010). 수학영재 수업 사례분석. 영재교육연구, 20(3), 655-679. (Park, K. S. (2010). A case study on instruction for mathematically gifted children. Journal of Gifted Education, 20(3), 655-679.)

11.
박영희 (2011). 초등 수학 수업 전문성 신장을 위한 대학과 초등학교의 학습공동체 사례 연구. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육논문집>, 25(1), 47-61. (Park, Y. H. (2011). Reporting the activities of professional development system for enhancing elementary mathematical teaching professionalism. Communications of Mathematical Education, 25(1), 47-61.)

12.
방정숙 (2009). 예비 초등 교사의 수업 전문성 신장을 위한 수학 수업 사례 분석. 초등교과교육연구, 11, 35-70. (Pang, J. S. (2009). An analysis of mathematics instruction for the professional development of prospective elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary School Curriculum and Instruction, 11, 35-70.)

13.
방정숙 (2010). 초등학교 수학 수업 어떻게 분석할 것 인가?. 초등교과교육연구, 15, 109-140. (Pang, J. S. (2010). How do we analyze elementary mathematics instruction? Journal of Elementary School Curriculum and Instruction, 15, 109-140.)

14.
방정숙․권미선․김정원 (2012). 초등학교 우수 수업 동영상에 나타난 좋은 수학 수업의 특징 분석. 한국초등수학교육학회지, 16(3), 403-426. (Pang, J. S., Kwon, M. S. & Kim, J. W. (2012). An analysis of the characteristics of effective mathematics instruction in the elementary school. Korea Society of Elementary Mathematics Education, 16(3), 403-426.)

15.
서혜애․박경희 (2005). 과학영재교육 교사 교수방법 전문지식 측정도구 개발. 한국교원교육연구, 22(2), 159-180. (Seo, H. A. & Park, K. H. (2005). Development of a science teacher scale of professional knowledge for teaching the gifted. The Study of the Korean Teacher Education, 22(2), 159-180)

16.
송인섭․한기순 (2008). 한국영재교육의 새로운 지평. 서울: 학지사. (Song, I. S. & Han, K. S. (2008). Direction of the Korean Gifted Education. Seoul: Hakjisa.)

17.
여상인․최남구 (2014). 초등영재 담당교사의 개인변 인에 따른 영재교육 전문성 비교 분석. 과학교육연구지, 38(1), 15-28. (Yeo, S. I. & Choi, N. G. (2008). Comparative analysis of elementary teachers' professionalism in gifted education according to their personal variables. Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 15-28.)

18.
영재교육종합데이터베이스 (2016). 국가영재 교육통계. Retrieved from https://gedkedi.re.kr (GED (2016). National Gifted Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://gedkedi.re.kr)

19.
이금선․강옥기 (2008). 수학교사의 전문성 신장을 위한 수업 반성에 대한 준거 제안. 학교수학, 10(2), 199-222. (Lee, K. S. & Kang, O. K. (2008). A study on the establishment of the criteria for teaching reflection for the professional enhancement of mathematics teachers. School Mathematics, 10(2), 199-222.)

20.
이안나 (2013). 초등수학 영재지도교사의 PCK와 수학 수업 분석. 서울교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문. ()(Lee, A. N. (2013). An analysis on the PCK and lessons of teachers for mathematically gifted elementary students. The Master's thesis of Seoul National University of Education.)

21.
이윤경․이중권 (2014). 우수 수학 수업 사례에 대한 Flanders 언어상호작용 분석. 수학교육학술지, 2014(2), 273-278. (Lee, Y. K. & Lee, J. K. (2014). Flanders interaction analysis for a case study of effective mathematics instruction. Studies in mathematical Education, 2014(2), 273-278.)

22.
이재분․김주아․서예원․강병직․김규린․이균호 (2013). KEDI 영재교육기관 평가 편람. 한국교육개발원 2013-06-1. (Lee, J. B., Kim, J. A., Seo, Y. W., Kang, B. J., Kim, K. R. & Lee, K. H. (2013). KEDI evaluation handbook of gifted education. KEDI 2013-06-1.)

23.
조경미․여상인 (2013). Flanders 언어상호작용 분석 프로그램을 이용한 초등과학영재수업에서의 유능 한 영재교사 발언 사례 연구. 영재교육연구, 23(6), 1055-1076. (Cho, K. M. & Yeo, S. I. (2013). A case study on effective teachers' discourse in science gifted class using Flanders interaction analysis program. Journal of Gifted Education, 23(6), 1055-1076.)

24.
조분경 (2015). 초등 수학영재학급 지도교사로서 반성 을 통한 수업 전문성 변화 분석. 서울교육대학교 교육전문대학원 석사학위 논문. (Jo, B. K. (2015). Changes in the professionalism as a teacher of mathematically gifted class through her reflection. The Master's thesis of Seoul National University of Education.)

25.
최남구 (2010). 영재 담당 교사의 전문성과 효능감에 관한 연구. 경인교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문. (Choi, N. G. (2010). Research on specialization and efficacy of teachers in charge of educating gifted children. The Master's thesis of Gyeongin National University of Education.)

26.
최승현 (2007). 교육과정 개정에 따른 수학과 내용교수지식(PCK) 연구. 한국교육과정평가원 2007-3-2. (Choe, S. H. (2007). The research on pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics depending on new revision of curriculum. KICE 2007-3-2.)

27.
최승현․임찬빈 (2006). 수업평가 매뉴얼 : 수학과 수업평가 기준. 한국교육과정평가원 2006-24-5. (Choe, S. H. & Imm, C. B. (2006). Class evaluation manual : Mathematics. KICE 2006-24-5.)

28.
최승현․박지현․남금천 (2013). 핵심역량에 기초한 중학교 수학 수업 방안 탐색-수학영재수업을 중심으로-. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육논문집>, 27(2), 99-119. (Choe, S. H., Park, J. H. & NAM, G. C. (2013). Schemes to incorporate key competencies for the gifted in the middle school math teaching. Communications of mathematical education, 27(2), 99-119.)

29.
황혜정 (2011). 수학 수업의 교사 지식에 관한 평가 요소 탐색-교수 학습 방법 및 평가를 중심으로. 한국학교수학회논문집, 14(3), 241-263. (Hwang, H. J. (2011). The study on the investigation of the mathematics teaching evaluation standards: Focused on teaching and learning methods and assessment. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 14(3), 241-263.)

30.
Assouline, S., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2005). Developing math talent: A guide for educating gifted and advanced learners in math. Waco: Prufrock Press.

31.
Bosse, M, J., & Rotigel, J, V. (2006). Encouraging your child's math talent: The involved parent's guide. Waco: Prufrock Press.

32.
Chambelin, M. T., & Chamberlin, S. A. (2010). Enhancing preservice teacher development: Field experiences with gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(3), 381-416. crossref(new window)

33.
Davis, G, A., Rimm, S, B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented(6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

34.
Hansen, J. B., & Feldhusen. J. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly. 38(3), 115-121. crossref(new window)

35.
Karp, A. (2010). Teachers of the Mathematically Gifted Tell About Themselves and Their Profession. The Roeper Institute, 32, 272-280. crossref(new window)

36.
Kitano, M., Montgomery, D., VanTassel-Baska, J., & Johnsen, S. K. (2008). Using the National Gifted Education Standards for prek-12 professional development. USA: NAGC & CEC-TAG

37.
Pang, J. S. (2009). Good mathematics instruction in south korea. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41(3), 349-362. crossref(new window)

38.
VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners(3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson.