JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A study on pre-service mathematics teachers` teaching behaviors and changes about motivation in microteaching
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A study on pre-service mathematics teachers` teaching behaviors and changes about motivation in microteaching
Shim, Sang Kil;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study investigated how pre-service mathematics teaches` experience in microteaching influences their motivations toward teaching behaviors and changes by analyzing their teaching records and class reports. Although respondents planned to conduct various strategies pertaining to motivations, some of them were not used. Also, motivations toward their teaching behavioral changes leaded to positive aspects, but also leaded to negative ones. These findings imply that only two times microteaching experiences would not be sufficient to lead to positive teaching behavioral changes through their motivations. However, pre-service mathematics reported a high level of intention to change their teaching behavior through a comprehensive review process regarding their teaching. Therefore, teacher eduction institutions should develop well structured educational programs and apply them to pre-service mathematics teachers for a better understanding of their teaching and its review through motivations. In addition, providing opportunities for pre-service mathematics teachers to experience various educational programs including microteaching would be necessary for improving their teaching behavior through motivations.
 Keywords
pre-service mathematics teachers;motivation;microteaching;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
김동렬.문두호.손연아 (2006). 중등 생물 교육에서 ARCS 수업 실태 및 교사의 인식 조사를 통한 동기 유발 전략의 수업 적용 방안 탐색, 한국생물교육학회지, 34(2), 185-200. Kim, D. R., Moon, D. H., & Son, Y. A. (2006). The Research on Motivation Strategies' Lesson Applications by Studying ARCS Programs and Teachers' Recognition in Secondary School Biology Education, The korean journal of biology education, 34(2), 185-200.

2.
김부미 (2014). 중학생의 학업스트레스와 학업동기유형 및 수학 학습 동기의 관계 분석, 학교수학, 16(1), 157-180. Kim, B. (2014). Relationships among Academic Stress, Academic Motivation Types and Mathematics Learning Motivation of Middle School Students, School Mathematics, 16(1), 157-180.

3.
김신자.이인숙.양영선 (1999). 교육공학의 이론과 실제, 서울: 문음사. Kim, S. J., Lee, I. S., & Yang, Y. S. (1999). Theory and Practice of Educational Technology, seoul: Moonumsa.

4.
김현진.김진수.최서욱.박영민.이광호.이혁규 (2010). 예비교사의 수업능력 개발을 위한 교육방안 연구, 연구보고 RRI 2010-16, 한국교육과정평가원. Kim, H. J., Kim, J. S., Choi, S. W., Park, Y. M., Lee, K. H., & Lee, H. K. (2010). The Research on education for development of teaching competency of pre-service teachers, RRI 2010-16, Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.

5.
나일주.정인성 (1996). 교육공학의 이해, 서울: 학지사. Rha, I. J. & Chung, I. S. (1996). Understanding of Educational Technology, seoul: Hakjisa Publisher.

6.
성열욱.김상운 (2001). 동기유발은 위한 ARCS이론을 적용한 수업이 수학과 문제해결력 신장에 미치는 영향, 한국학교수학회논문집, 4(2), 93-102. Sung, Y. O. & Kim, S. U. (2001). The effectiveness of the ARCS model which is adapted to improve the solution of mathematical problems for the induction of motivation in learners, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 4(2), 93-102.

7.
송상호 (1998) ARCS 모델에 대한 비판적 고찰: 가정, 특징, 그리고 쟁점들, 교육공학연구, 14(3) 155-176. Song, S. H. (1998). Examination of the ARCS Model: Assumptions, Features, and Theoretical Issues, Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3) 155-176.

8.
심상길.윤혜순 (2012). 마이크로티칭에서 수학 예비교사들의 수업 행동과 변화에 대한 연구, 수학교육, 51(2), 131-144. Shim, S. K. & Yun, H. S. (2012). A Study on Mathematics Pre-service Teachers' Teaching Behaviors and Changes in Microteaching, The Mathematical Education, 51(2), 131-144.

9.
심상길.이강섭 (2014). 수학교사들의 동기유발에 대한 필요성과 활용에 대한 인식, 수학교육, 53(4), 449-462. Shim, S. K. & Lee, K. S. (2014). An analysis of mathematics teachers' perceptions about motivation, The Mathematical Education, 53(4), 449-462.

10.
오후진.이유심 (2002). 수학과 동기유발을 위한 학습자료의 활용에 관한 연구, 과학교육연구, 33, 103-116. Oh, H. J. & Lee, Y. S. (2002). The Study on Using Teaching Materials in Mathematics for Stimulating Learners, Report of Science Education, 33, 103-116.

11.
이대현.최승현 (2006). 수학과 좋은 수업 사례에 대한 질적 분석, 한국학교수학회논문집, 9(3), 249-263. Lee, D. H. & Choe, S. H. (2006). A Qualitative Analysis on the Characteristics of "Best Practice" in Mathematics, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 9(3), 249-263.

12.
정태희 (2004). 마이크로티칭 기법을 활용한 발표수업이 대학생의 자기효능감에 미치는 효과, 교육과정연구, 22(4), 189-208. Chung, T. H. (2004). The Effect of Speech Activity using Microteaching on Self-Efficacy, The journal of curriculum studies, 22(4), 189-208.

13.
조영남 (2011). 마이크로티칭과 초등 예비교사교육; 초등 예비교사들의 인식과 자기평가를 중심으로, 초등교육연구, 24(1), 65-84. Cho, Y. N. (2011). Microteaching and Elementary Pre-service Teacher Education; Pre-service students' Cognition and Self-evaluation on Microteaching, The journal of elementary education, 24(1), 65-84.

14.
켈러.송상호 (1999). 매력적인 수업 설계, 서울: 교육과학사. Keller, J. M. & Song, S. H. (1999). Attractive Instructional Design, Seoul: Kyoyookkwahaksa.

15.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and Use of the ARCS Model of Instructional Design, Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10. crossref(new window)

16.
Means, T. B., Jonassen, D. H., & Dwyer, F. M. (1997). Enhancing Relevance: Embedded ARCS Strategies vs. Purpose, Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 5-17.

17.
Middleton, J. A. & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for Achievement in Mathematics: Findings, Generalizations, and Criticisms of the Research, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65-88 crossref(new window)