JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Analysis on the Results of Mathematics Field Trips for Pre-service Mathematics Teacher
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Analysis on the Results of Mathematics Field Trips for Pre-service Mathematics Teacher
Suh, Bo Euk;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study is the field of mathematics education on the assumption that they can extend outside the classroom. Recent mathematics education is increasing the importance of field experience and various activities based on real-life math education. Thus, it is necessary to consider this situation in pre-service teacher`s education. The purpose of this study is to apply the `Mathematics Field Trips Activities` in the pre-mathematics teacher education. So the specific case of `Mathematics Field Trips Activities` was analyzed. Mathematics teachers conducted preliminary exploration activities on the historical cultural property which were effective in the following four aspects. First, cognitive effects and second, definitive effect. Third, cultural-mathematical effect. Fourth, the effect on improving math class. Finally they were summarized and divided into classes target content knowledge and teaching knowledge both sides. As a result, the `Mathematics Field Trips Activities` were found to have significant effects on pre-service math teacher. Finally, ongoing research is needed to settle into a new teaching and learning methods.
 Keywords
School Mathematics Field Trips;PCK(Pedagogical content knowledge);Pre-service Mathematics Teacher;Mathematics and Culture;Improving Teaching Methods;Mathematics Teaching Material;Mathematics and History;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
강옥기.강윤수.고상숙.고호경.권나영.김구연.김래영.김민경.김응환.김익표.노선숙.서보억.신재홍.이수진.이중권.정인철.한인기.허혜자.황우형 (2013). 수학교육학신서. 서울: 교우사. (Kang, O. K., Kang, Y. S., Koo, S. S., Koo, H. K., Kwon, N. Y., Kim, G. Y., Kim, L. Y., Kim, M. K., Kim, H. H., Kim, I. P., No, S. S., Suh. B. E., Shin. J. H., Lee, S. J., Lee, J. K., Jung, I. C., Han, I. K., Heur, H. J. & Hwang, W. H. (2013). New mathematical education, Seoul: Kyowoosa.)

2.
교육부 (2015). 수학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호[별책8]. (The Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics curriculum, Sejong: MEST.)

3.
문태선 (2011). 수학체험학습에서 나타난 수학영재의 특성 및 태도와 인식의 변화. 한국교원대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문. (Moon, T. S. (2011). Characteristics and changes of mathematically gifted students in attitudes and perceptions on mathematical experience, Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education.)

4.
박승재.최재혁 (2004). 수원 화성 과학 탐방을 통한 문화재에 대한 과학적 안목 형성 지도. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(5), 930-936. (Park, S. J. & Choi, J. H (2004). The development of students' scientific perspectives on historical heritages through the science field trip of hwasong fortress, Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 24(5), 930-936.)

5.
서보억 (2013). 수학 교수.학습을 위한 '학교수학답사'의 유형 탐색. 2013국제수학영재교육학술대회 프로시딩, 107-111. (Suh, B. E (2013). A school math tour type discovery for mathematics teaching and learning, Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on mathematics education, 107-111.)

6.
서보억 (2015). 수학 교수.학습을 위한 '학교수학답사'의 개념 탐색. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 54(1), 1-11. (Suh, B. E. (2015). A Study on School Mathematics Field Trips for Teaching & Learning Method in Mathematics Education, The Mathematical Education, 54(1), 1-11.)

7.
신현용 (2010a). 수학여행 수학여행 1. 한국수학교육학회 뉴스레터. 126호. 한국수학교육학회. (Shin, H. Y. (2010a). Math tour 1, Korea society of mathematical education news letter, No. 126.)

8.
신현용 (2010b). 수학여행 수학여행 2. 한국수학교육학회 뉴스레터. 127호. 한국수학교육학회. (Shin, H. Y. (2010b). Math tour 2, Korea society of mathematical education news letter, No. 127.)

9.
신현용 (2010c). 수학여행 수학여행 3. 한국수학교육학회 뉴스레터. 128호. 한국수학교육학회. (Shin, H. Y. (2010c). Math tour 3, Korea society of mathematical education news letter, No. 128.)

10.
신현용 (2010d). 수학여행 수학여행 4. 한국수학교육학회 뉴스레터. 129호. 한국수학교육학회. (Shin, H. Y. (2010d). Math tour 4, Korea society of mathematical education news letter, No. 129.)

11.
신현용.서보억.이경언.최수현.나준영.윤민지.최명숙.문태선.박병주.조세연 (2010). 수학여행 수학여행, ICME-12문화특별위원회. (Shin, H. Y., Suh, B. E., Lee, K. Y., Choi, S. H., Na, J. Y., Yoon, M. J., Choi, M. S., Moon, T. S., Park, B. J. & Jo, S. Y. (2010). Math tour, ICME-12 Culture Committee.)

12.
신현용.서보억.최명숙.박병주 (2011). 수학여행 수학여행2. ICME-12문화특별위원회. (Shin, H. Y., Suh, B. E., Choi, M. S. & Park, B. J. (2011). Math tour 2, ICME-12 Culture Committee.)

13.
윤혜경 (1998). 한국 역사 속 과학 탐방의 실제 지도 방안. 과학교육자 큰 모임, 한국과학교육단체총연합회. (Yoon, H. K. (1998). Science teaching methods through the science field trip, The Korean federation of science education societies.)

14.
이정원 (1998). 영릉과학탐방을 통한 중학생들의 문화재에 대한 개방적 탐구활동 분석. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. (Lee, J. W. (1998). An analys is of junior high school students' open-ended investigation into cultural assets through the science field trip in Young-nung, Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University.)

15.
전영석 (1998). 고인쇄 박물관 과학 탐방의 지도와 평가. 한국 역사 속 과학 탐방 교육, 한국과학교육단체총연합회 (Jeun, Y. S. (1998). A teaching and evaluation through the science field trip in Korea old printing museum, The Korean federation of science education societies.)

16.
최승현 (2007). 교육과정 개정에 따른 수학과 내용 교수 지식 연구, 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRI 2007-3-2. (Choi, S. H. (2007). Research for the PCK in the curriculum revision, Korean Institute for Curriculum's Research Report No. RRI 2007-3-3.)

17.
최승현.황혜정 (2008). 수학과 내용 교수 지식의 의미 및 분석틀 개발에 관한 연구. 한국학교수학회논문집, 11(4), 569-593. (Choi, S. H. & Hwang, H. J. (2008). The Research on Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Mathematics Teaching, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 11(4), 569-593)

18.
최재혁 (1999). 화성과학 탐방을 통한 문화재에 대한 과학적 안목 형성 지도. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. (Choi, J. H. (1999). The development of students' scientific perspectives for cultural heritages through the science field trip of Hwasong fortress, Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University.)

19.
홍성민.김상룡 (2002). 수학적 상황 설정 방법에 관한 연구. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 C <초등수학교육>, 6(1), 41-54. (Hong, S. M. & Kim, S. Y. (2002). A Study on the Method of Mathematical Situation Posing, Education of primary school mathematics, 6(1), 41-54.)

20.
Boyd (1986). The significance of significance in cultural heritage studies: a role for cultural analogues in applied geography teaching. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 20(3), 295-304.

21.
Cross, P. K. (1998). Why learning communities? Why now?, About Campus 3(3), 4-11.

22.
Ericksen, D. & Marchinek, T. (2012). Important dates and historical places as motivators for studying historical aspects of mathematical Ideals: The end of the world and Maya mathematics, ICME-12 Poster Session Proceeding.

23.
Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task, D. Reidel Publishing Company.

24.
Kuntz, J. J. (2006). Take a trip with math, Teaching K-8 January 2006, 50-51.

25.
Mangiante, E. S. (2009). Forest or Field, Science and Children, september 2009.

26.
NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematic. 류희찬, 조완영, 이경화, 나귀수, 김남균, 방정숙 공역(2007). 학교수학을 위한 원리와 규준. 서울: 경문사.

27.
Nesbit, S., Mayer, A. (2010). Shifting Attitude: The Influence of Field Trip Experiences on Student Beliefs, Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal, 4(2), 1-22.

28.
Noel, A. M. & Colopy, M. A. (2006). Making history field trips meaningful: Teachers' and site educators' perspectives on teaching materials, Theory and Research in Social Education 34(3), 553-568. crossref(new window)

29.
Orion, N. & Hofstein, A. (1991). The measurement of students' attitudes towards scientific field trips, Science Education 75, 513-523. crossref(new window)

30.
Orion, N. (1993). A Model for the Development and Implementation of Field Trips as an Integral Part of the Science Curriculum, School Science and Mathematics 93(6), 325-331. crossref(new window)

31.
Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning: vol. I. induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

32.
Rudmann, C. L. (1994). A review of the use and implementation of science field trips. School Science and Mathematics, 94(30), pp.138-141. crossref(new window)

33.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform, Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22. crossref(new window)