JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Difference in the Quality of Life and Related Factors according to the Employment Status
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Difference in the Quality of Life and Related Factors according to the Employment Status
Gim, Mi-Seon; Han, Ji-Yeon; Kim, Chul-Woung;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The purpose of study is to find difference in the quality of life and related factors according to the employment status. Using data from the fifth National Health and Nutrition Survey, economically active population of 20-69 years old 3,429 participants who said to questions of `economic activity status` were finally used as analysis subjects in Korea. According to economic activity status, individuals were divided by the six different employment status and their quality of life was inspected using the EQ-5D dimensions and index score as well as analyzing the factors affecting the quality of life. As a result, unemployed compared to full-time workers, had significantly higher needs of four dimensions and Unpaid family workers had in the dimensions of Mobility, Self-care and Usual activities and temporary job had in the dimensions of Self-care and Usual activities. After figuring out life quality factors according to employment status, it was found that compared to full-time workers greater age(${\beta}
 Keywords
Economic activity status;Employment status;EQ-5D;Quality of life;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Abdin E, Subramaniam M, Vaingankar JA, Luo N, Chong SA. Measuring health-related quality of the among adults in Singapore: population norms for the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res, Vol. 22, No. 10, 2983-2991, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0405-x crossref(new window)

2.
Kimman M, Vathesatogkit P, Woodward M. Validity of the Thai EQ-5D in an occupational population in Thailand. Qual Life Res, Vol. 22, No. 6, 1499-1506, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0251-2

3.
S.Y. Sohn. The Effect of Regular Workers and Non-regular Workers on the Subjective Health Status. Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing, Vol. 20, No. 3, 346-355, November 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5807/kjohn.2011.20.3.346

4.
H.R. Kim. The Relationship of Socioeconomic Position and Health Behaviors with Morbidity in Seoul, Korea. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Vol. 25, No. 2, 3-35, 2005.

5.
G.T. Lim. Difference in Health-related Quality of Life among Social Classes and Related Factors in korea. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2189-2198, May 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.5.2189 crossref(new window)

6.
Barger SD, Donoho CJ, Wayment HA. The relative contributions of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, health, and socail relationships to life satisfaction in the United States. Qual Life Res, 18, 179-189, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9426-2 crossref(new window)

7.
Lubetkin EI, Jia H, Franks P, Gold MR. Relationship among sociodemographic factors, clinical conditions, and health-related quality of life: Examining the EQ-5D in the U.S. general population. Qual Life Res, 14, 2187-2196, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-8028-5 crossref(new window)

8.
Sun S, Chen J, Johannesson M. Population health status in China: EQ-5D results, by age, sex and socio-economic status, from the National Health Services Survey 2008. Qual Life Res, 20, 309-320, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9762-x crossref(new window)

9.
S.C. Shin, M.C. Kim. The Effect of Occupation and Employment Status upon Perceived Health in South Korea. Health and Social Science, 2007-7, 205-224, 2007.

10.
E.S. Jeon, K.S. Lee, S.Y. Lee, J.H. Yu, A.R. Hong. The Relationship between Job stress and Quality of Life for Hospital Workers by Type of Employment. Korean J Occup Environ Med,Vol. 21, No. 1, 28-37, 2009.

11.
S.J. Coons, S Rao, D.L. Keininger, R.D. Hays. A comparative Review of Generic Quality-of-life Instruments. Pharmacoeconomics, Vol. 17, No. 1, 13-35, January 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200017010-00002 crossref(new window)

12.
H.S. Nam. South Korean time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Public Health Weekly Report, Vol. 3, No. 16, 261-264, 2010.

13.
Burstrom K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F. Increasing socio-economic inequalities in life expectancy and QALYs in Sweden 1980-1997. Health Econ, Vol. 14, No. 8, 831-850, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.977 crossref(new window)

14.
Sergio Rueda, Janet Raboud, Cameron Mustard, Ahmed Bayoumi, John N. Lavis. AIDS Care, Vol. 23, No. 4, 435-443, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2010.507952 crossref(new window)

15.
S.Y. Lee, S.J. Kim, J.Y. Shin, K.T. Han, E.C. Park. The impact of job status on quality of life: general population versus long-term cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, wileyonlinelibrary.com, 2015.

16.
Bouwin E Carlier, Merel Schuring, Freek JB Lotters, Bernhard Bakker, Natacha Borgers, Alex Burdorf. The influence of re-employment on quality of life and self-rated health, a longditudinal study among unemployed persons in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health, 2013, 13:503 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-503 crossref(new window)

17.
S.S. Sung, C.B. Choi, Y.K. Sung, Y.W. Bak, H.S. Lee, W.S. Um, T.H. Kim, J.B. Jeon, D.H. Jeon, O.Y. Lee, S.C. Bae. Health-Related Quality of Life using EQ-5D in Koreans. The Journal of the Korean Rheumatism Association, Vol. 11, No. 3, 254-262, 2004.

18.
M.W. Jo, S.I. Lee, S.R. Kil. J.H. Lee, W.C. Kang, H.S. Sohn, C.I. Yoo. Measuring Health Related Quality of Life of General Adult Population in One Metropolitan City using EQ-5D. Korean Journal of Health Policy & Administration, Vol.18. No. 3, 40-23, 2008.