JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Satisfaction Evaluation for Orthoses by using QUEST
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Satisfaction Evaluation for Orthoses by using QUEST
Kong, Jin-Yong;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study presents a unique way to improve consumer-oriented service for assistive orthosis products. Satisfaction and important factors were analyzed based on responses from disabled people who have used the orthoses. We surveyed 185 disabled people with QUEST (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology), and we conducted in-depth interviews with 25 individuals. The average satisfaction score was 3.68 (orthoses satisfaction: 3.78; service satisfaction: 3.52). For each item, the highest score was effectiveness, and the lowest one was cost. As important factors for each item, the participants selected cost, comfort, repair, and service. The fee system for orthoses needs rational revision, and a delivery system should be constructed for follow-up services such as repair.
 Keywords
Assistive Products;Important;Orthoses;QUEST;Satisfaction;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Korea Disabled People's Development Institute, A Study on Improvements of Protheses and Orthoses Management System, 2011.

2.
D. G. Kim, Measure for the Improvements of Benefits for Assistive Devices, 2014.

3.
Cook, A.M. and Hussey, S.M., Assistive Technology : Principles and Practice(2nd ed). Saint Louis: Mosby, 2002.

4.
Rust, K.L., Smith, R.O. "Assistive Technology in the Measurement of Rehabilitation and Health Outcomes: A Review and Analysis of Instruments," American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 84, No. 10, pp 780-793, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000179520.34844.0e crossref(new window)

5.
Stiskel, M.S., Ryan, S., Rigby, P.J. and Jutai, J.W., "Toward a Comprehensive Evaluation of the Impact of Electronic Aids to Daily Living: Evaluation of Consumer Satisfaction," Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 24, No2, pp 115-125, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280110066794 crossref(new window)

6.
J. Y. Kong, “The Effect of Modular Seating System to Hand Function and Occupational Performance,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 379-395, 2014.

7.
G. S. Jeong, M. Y. Jang, G. C. Hwang, G. M. Kim, "Research on the State of Adaptive Seating Devices for Children With Cerebral Palsy and Parent Satisfaction," Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp 83-102 2010.

8.
D. H. Jeong, S. T. Hong, "A Comparative Study on the User Satisfaction of Wheelchair Using the QUEST 2.0," Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp 61-76, 2008.

9.
D. H. Jeong, "A Study on the Assistive Technology Devices and Services Satisfaction of the College Students with Visual Impairment," Journal of Rehabilitation Research, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp 129-146, 2011.

10.
J. A. Hong, S. D. Lee, D. M. Yeum, "The Study of the Impact of Using Hearing Aids on Job Satisfaction and Daily Life Satisfaction of Hearing-impaired Workers," Journal of Rehabilitation Welfare Engineering & Assistive Technology, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp 67-72, 2013.

11.
S. B. Im, J. H. Lee, G. M. Lee, "The Study on Satisfaction for Customized and Modified Assistive Technology Device Using QUEST," Rehabilitation Welfare Engineering & Assistive Technology Society of Korea Conference, Vol. 2012, No. 4, pp 148-149, 2012.

12.
H. Y. Yeom, M. Y. Jeong, E. Y. Yoo, S. H. Park, G. H. Park, G. Y. Jang, "Analysis of Factors Affecting Assistive Technology Use for the Workers with Disability," Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp 97-115, 2013.

13.
Peaco, A., Halsne, E., Hafner, B.J., "Assessing Satisfaction with Orthotic Devices and Services: A Systematic Literature Review," Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp 95-105. 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0b013e318217a0fe crossref(new window)

14.
Bettoni, E., Ferriero, G., Bakhsh, H., Bravini, E., Massazza, G., Franchignoni, F., "A Systematic Review of Questionnaires to Assess Patient Satisfaction with Limb Orthoses," Prosthetics and Orthotics International. Vol. 38, No. 4, pp 1-12. 2014.

15.
De Boer, I.G., Peeters, A.J., Ronday, H.K., Mertens, B.J., Breedveld, F.C., Vliet Vlieland, T.P., "The Usage of Functional Wrist Orthoses in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis," Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp 286-295, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280701257031 crossref(new window)

16.
Wessels, R.D. and De Witte, L.P., "Reliability and Validity of the Dutch Version of QUEST 2.0 with Users of Various Types of Assistive Devices," Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp 267-272, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0963828021000031197 crossref(new window)

17.
Magnusson, L., Ahlstrom, G., Ramstrand, N., Fransson, E.I., "Malawian Prosthetic and Orthotic Users Mobility and Satisfaction with Their Lower Limb Assistive Device," Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp 385-391, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1117 crossref(new window)

18.
Magnusson, L., Ramstrand, N., Fransson, E.I., Ahlstrom, G., "Mobility and Satisfaction with Lower-limb Prostheses and Orthoses among Users in Sierra Leone: A Cross-Sectional Study," Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp 438-446, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1780 crossref(new window)

19.
S. H. Lee, B. K. Jung, S. Y. Park, "Korean Translation and Psychometric Properties of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction Assistive Technology 2.0," Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol. 14, No. 7, pp 3284-3292, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.7.3284 crossref(new window)

20.
N. Y. An, J. Y. Kong, "A Study of Translation and Verification on the Korean Version of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0)," Disability & Employment, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp 99-116. 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15707/disem.2009.19.2.005 crossref(new window)

21.
Y. H. Jeon, G. M. Lee, "An Analysis of Satisfaction of Assistive Technology Service Provided by Sector of Employment of Persons with Disabilities," Journal of Rehabilitation Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp 127-150, 2014.

22.
D. H. Jeong, "Analysis on the Satisfaction of Custom Fitted Seating System of Students with Cerebral Palsy and Parents Using the Modified QUEST," Korean Journal of Physical, Multiple, & Health Disabilities, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp 19-34, 2008.

23.
Chen, C.L., Teng, Y.L., Lou, S.Z., Lin, C.H., Chen, F.F., Yeung, K.T., "User Satisfaction with Orthotic Devices and Service in Taiwan". PLoS One. Vol. 9, No. 10, pp 1-10, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110661 crossref(new window)

24.
Jiang, L., Gan, C., Kao, B., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., Cai, L., "Consumer Satisfaction with Public Health Care in China," Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp 223-235, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.223.235 crossref(new window)

25.
W. H. Choi, E. J. Jung, "The Effect of Assistive Technology Service and Strategy for Support," Journal of Rehabilitation Research, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp 205-228, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16884/JRR.2015.19.2.205 crossref(new window)

26.
National Human Rights Commission of Korea, Community Health Promotion Program for Disabled Persons, 2014.

27.
Hovorka, C.F., Geil, M.D., Lusardi, M.M., Principles Influencing Orthotic and Prosthetic Design: Biomechanics, Device User Interface, and Related Concepts, Orthotics and Prosthetics in Rehabilitation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, Ltd., pp 135-136, 2007.

28.
Vasluian, E., van Wijk, I., Dijkstra, P.U., Reinders-Messelink, H.A., van der Sluis, C.K., "Adaptive devices in young people with upper limb reduction deficiencies," Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp 346-355, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1922 crossref(new window)