JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Efficiency of concentrating marine microplanktonic organisms using net sampler to verify the efficacy of a ship's ballast water treatment system
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Efficiency of concentrating marine microplanktonic organisms using net sampler to verify the efficacy of a ship's ballast water treatment system
Baek, Seung Ho; Lee, Min Ji; Shin, kyoungsoon;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
To provide a type approval test for Ballast Water Treatment System (BWTS) of United States Coast Guard (USCG) Phase-II, this study examined the concentrating efficiency of nets for and sized phytoplanktonic organisms using different mesh sized nets ( or ), different injection methods (hand breaker as semi-continuous assessment or pump as continuous assessment), and different filterability for the water volume. As a result of the t-test, the net concentrated efficiency between and mesh size was not significant (p > 0.05). The difference in the net concentrated efficiency for filtered natural water volume was not significant (p > 0.05). On the other hand, the Chl.a concentration in the continuous water injection method was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that of semi-continuous water injection (t-test: t: -4.058). In the natural phytoplankton community, a total of 36 species were identified, including Bacillariophyta (17 species), Dinophyta (15 species), Euglenophyta (1 species), Dictyochophyta (2 species), and unidentified taxa (1 species). Among them, diatom Pseudo-nitzchia spp. was remarkably dominant. In particular, the net concentrated efficiency in all assessments was underestimated to be approximately 20-25%, which was caused by the small size Pseudo-nitzchia spp.. A width size of these genus might have passed through the or mesh size of the net. Therefore, net concentrated efficiency is dependent on the size of the observed species in natural water. This issue should be considered when determining the net volume for the type approval test of BWTS.
 Keywords
USCG phase-II;Ballast water;Mesh size;Net sampler;Phytoplankton;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
IMO, "Report on the ballast water treatment standards workshop". In 1st International ballast water treatment standards workshop, IMO London, 28-30 March. http://globallast.Imo.org/workshopreport.htm, 2001.

2.
N. Bax, A. Williamson, M. Aguero, E. Gonzalez, W. Geeves, "Marine invasive alien species: a threat to global biodiversity". Mar. Policy, 27, 313-323, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-597X(03)00041-1 crossref(new window)

3.
A.W. Miller, M. Frazier, G.E. Smith, E.S. Perry, G.M. Ruiz, M.N. Tamburri, "Enumerating sparse organisms in ships' ballast water: Why counting to 10 is not so easy". Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 3539-3546, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es102790d crossref(new window)

4.
T.R, Parsons, Y. Maita, C.M. Lalli. "A Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Seawater Analysis". Pergamon Press, Oxford. 173 p. 1984.

5.
L. Perez, J. Canteras. "Influence of tidal conditions and river volume on phytoplankton distribution and composition in the Pas estuary (Northern Spain)". Scient. Mar., 54, 77-88. 1990.

6.
S.H. Baek, S. Shimode, M.S. Han, T.Kikuchi, "Population development of the dinoflagellates Ceratium furca and Ceratium fusus during Spring and Early Summer in Iwa Harbor, Sagami Bay, Japan". Ocean Sci. J., 43, 49-59, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03022431 crossref(new window)

7.
J. Sun, D. Liu, "Geometric models for calculating cell biovolume and surface area for phytoplankton". J. Plankton Res. 25, 1331-1346. 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbg096 crossref(new window)