JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Discussion Class Model to Improve English Oral Proficiency for Intermediate Low Learners
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Discussion Class Model to Improve English Oral Proficiency for Intermediate Low Learners
Ko, Mi-Sook;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This paper suggests a class model to improve the English oral proficiency for intermediate low English speaking learners. Utilizing the four English skills (reading, writing, listening and speaking), the class model focuses on the learners' schema and discussion strategies. To enhance the learners' motivation and match their cognitive capacity, 10 discussion topics were prepared by surveying the learners. A pilot experiment was conducted to investigate the teaching effects of the discussion class model with 26 college students majoring in English in Seoul. The participants' oral proficiency was measured both before, and after the instructions by OPIc (Oral Proficiency Interview in computer). As a result of the experiment, the percentage of participants whose oral proficiency levels were lower than intermediate mid decreased from 82% to 47%. In addition, the percentage of participants with higher oral proficiency than intermediate low was increased dramatically from 18% to 53%, which supports the claim that through discussion, the class learners' diverse and creative ideas need to be expressed in a formal and intelligible language. Finally, through the findings of the study, the possibility of a discussion class can be expected, regardless of the learners' low level of oral proficiency.
 Keywords
Class Model;Discussion Ability;English Discussion;English Speaking;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
M. S. Ko. "Improving English speaking proficiency with OPIc," Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 21-45, 2010.

2.
M. S. Ko. "Strategies of storytelling based teaching of English speaking for novice high learners," Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 3172-3179, 2015. crossref(new window)

3.
P. Carrell. "Content and formal schemata in ESL reading," TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 21, pp. 461-481, 1987. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586498 crossref(new window)

4.
S. M. Hong. Class types for Korean English learners to improve discussion ability, Seoul, Korean Academy Information, 2007.

5.
D. J. Young. "An investigation of student's perspectives on anxiety and speaking," Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 539-553, 1990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1990.tb00424.x crossref(new window)

6.
J. T. Chang. The mask mechanism; A study of anxiety, motivation & communicative competence of korean learners of English in computer-mediated communication environments, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Manchester University, 2002.

7.
S. Y. Kim. "Korean college students' reflections of English language learning via CMC and FFC ," Multimeia-Assisted Language Learning, Vol. 5, No. 21, pp. 9-28, 2002.

8.
S. Y. Kim "A combination of CMC and FFC: Its effects on Korean students' oral proficiency and attitudes," English Teaching, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 61-80, 2003.