JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Managerial Priority Derivation for Pollutants in Drinking Water
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Managerial Priority Derivation for Pollutants in Drinking Water
Oh, Hee-Kyun; Lee, Hee-Chan;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The main purpose of this study was to derive managerial priority for pollutants in drinking water using the Delphi technique and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. We collected fundamental existing items based on a literature review for water pollutants, and deduced a total of 36 sub-items from nine core sectors, as follows: organic matter; inorganic substances; pathogenic organisms; chemicals; heavy metals; radioactive substances; sediment deposits; heat; and oil, and then conducted the first round of an expert study to ensure that objective indicators properly evaluate major issues for management of for drinking water quality. In the following round, the necessity and importance assessments of adjusted items were implemented using a content validity ratio index. Finally, items modified by Delphi surveys were applied to AHP. We computed weighted values by pair-wise comparison of sub-items and each of five sectors modified by the second round. According to the results of AHP, the managerial priority for pollutants in drinking water was as follows; while heavy metal placed first in importance, pathogenic organisms came second, followed by inorganic substances, organic matter and chemical substances from the sector perspective.
 Keywords
AHP;Delphi technique;Drinking water;Pollutants;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Baek, Y. M., Chung, Y., Park, J. C., and Kim, H. J. (2006). Risk Assessment of Drinking Water Pollutants, Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment, 22(6), pp. 1107-1118. [Korean Literature]

2.
Chun, S. J., Song, J. J., Yoo, K. W., Lee, Y. S., and Chang, B. G. (2010). An Introduction Water Pollution, Shingwang Publisher, pp. 26-53. [Korean Literature]

3.
Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., and Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal and Delphi Processes, Glenview, Foresman, IL.

4.
Fink, A. and Kosecoff, J. (1985). How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-step Guide, Sage Publications, London.

5.
Gordon, T. J. (1994). The Delphi Method in Futures Research Methodology, AC/UNU Millenium Project Version3.

6.
Kim, J. K. (2010). An Introduction Water Pollution, Donghwa Technology Publisher, pp. 36-76. [Korean Literature]

7.
Kim, J. S. (2014). A Study on the Priority Order Selection Method for Restoration of Rural Stream, Doctor's Thesis, Jeonju, Korea. [Korean Literature]

8.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity, Personnel Psychology, 28(4), pp. 563-575. crossref(new window)

9.
Lee, J. S. (2001). Delphi Method, Education Science Publisher, pp. 7-32. [Korean Literature]

10.
Lee, S. S. and Ko, J. Y. (2014). The Study of the Development of Bottled Water Quality Index Item, Journal of Foodservice Management, 17(3), pp. 279-301. [Korean Literature]

11.
Nam, M. K. (2009). Analysis on Priority of Management of Water Quality Around Naval Base Using AHP, Master's Thesis, Seoul, Korea. [Korean Literature]

12.
Rowe, G. and Wright, G. (2001). Expert Opinions in Forecasting: The Role of the Delphi Technique. In: J. S. Armstrong, Editor, Principles of Forecasting, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, pp. 125-144.

13.
Park, C. H., Kim, S. S., Ryu, B. R., and Yang, Y. W. (2012). An Introduction Water Pollution, Donghwa Technology Publisher, pp. 30-55. [Korean Literature]

14.
Park, J. S. and Rhee, K. H. (2015). Items and Indicators of Evaluation for Decision of Priority in Improving River Water Quality, The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 80, pp. 83-100. [Korean Literature]

15.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), pp. 9-26. crossref(new window)