JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Improvement of the Method using the Coefficient of Variation for Automatic Multi-segmentation Method of a Rating Curve
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Improvement of the Method using the Coefficient of Variation for Automatic Multi-segmentation Method of a Rating Curve
Kim, Yeonsu; Kim, Jeongyup; An, Hyunuk; Jung, Kwansue;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In general, the water stage-discharge relationship curve is established based on the assumptions of linearity and homoscedasticity. However, the relationship between the water stage and discharge is affected from geomorphological factors, which violates the basic assumptions of the water stage-discharge relationship curve. In order to reduce the error due to the violations, the curve is divided into several sections based on the manager`s judgement considering change of cross-sectional shape. In this research, the objective-splitting criteria of the curve is proposed based on the measured data without the subjective decision. First, it is assumed that the coefficient of variation follows the normal distribution. Then, if the newly calculated coefficient of variation is outside of the 95% confidential interval, the curve is divided. Namely, the groups is divided by the characteristics of the coefficient of variation and the reasonable criteria is provided for establishing a multi-segmented rating curve. To validate the proposed method, it was applied to the data generated by three artificial power functions. In addition, to confirm the applicability of the proposed method, it is applied to the water stage and discharge data of the Muju water stage gauging station and Sangegyo water stage gauging station. As a result, it is found that the automatically divided rating curve improves the accuracy and extrapolation accuracy of the rating curve. Finally, through the residual analysis using Shapiro-Wilk normality test, it is confirmed that the residual of water stage-discharge relationship curve tends to follow the normal distribution.
 Keywords
automatic multi-segmented method;rating curve;coefficient of variation;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Cho, M., Kim, M.S., Choi, H., and Park, J. (2004). "Uncertainty analysis of flow measurement data in sum river experimental watershed." Conference proceeding of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 4114-4119.

2.
Cho, Y.D. (2003). The automated program in deriving the stage-discharge curve by applying coefficient of variation, Master thesis, Chungnam national university.

3.
Choi, S., Kwon, B., and Lee, S. (2012). "Accuracy of the annual prediction of the stage-discharge relationship." Conference Proceeding of Korean Water Resources Association, Vol. 5, pp. 516-520.

4.
Di Baldassarre, G., and Montanari, A. (2009). "Uncertainty in river discharge observations: a quantitative analysis." Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., Vol. 13, pp. 913-921. crossref(new window)

5.
Gergov, G., and Karagiozova, T. (2003). "Unique discharge rating curve based on the morphology parameter Z." International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Publication, Vol. 278, pp. 3-8.

6.
Iglewigz, B., and Raymond, H.M. (1970). "Comparisons of Approximations to the Percentage Points of the Sample Coefficient of Variation." Technometrics, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 166-169.

7.
Johnson, L.H. (1952). "Nomography and empirical equation." Johnson Willey, New York, p. 150.

8.
Jung, H.S., and Lee, W.H., and Lee, J.J. (1988). "Analysis on the Stage-Discharge Curve with the Temporal Variation of the River Bed." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 61-71.

9.
Kim, S., and Jung, K. (2005). "Manning's n calibration and sensitivity analysis using unsteady flood routing model." Conference proceeding of Korean Water Resources Association, pp. 324-328.

10.
Kim, W., Kim, Y., and Woo, H. (1995). "Estimation of Channel Roughness Coefficients in the Han River Using Unsteady Flow Model." Magazine of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 28, No. 26, pp. 133-146.

11.
Kim, Y., Tachikawa, Y., Kim, S., Shiiba, M., Yorozu, K., and Noh, S.J. (2013). "Simultaneous Estimation of Inflow and Channel Roughness Using 2d Hydraulic Model and Particle Filters." Journal of Flood Risk Management, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 112-123. crossref(new window)

12.
Kim, S.U., and Lee, K.S. (2008). "Identification of Uncertainty in Fitting Rating Curve with Bayesian Regression." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 41, No. 9, pp. 943-958. crossref(new window)

13.
Le Coz, J. (2012). "A literature review of methods for estimating the uncertainty associated with stagedischarge relations." WMO initiative on Assessment of the Performance of Flow Measurement Instruments and Techniques-Project output.

14.
Lee, C.H. (2002). "Nonlinear Optimization of Rating Curves with VBA." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 22, No. 1-B, pp. 43-55.

15.
Lee, J.H., and Kang, C.U. (2008). "CV control chart using CUSUM scheme." Proceedings of Korea industrial systems engineering spring conference, pp. 275-278.

16.
Lee, J.J., and Kwon H.H. (2010). "A Basic Study of Stage-discharge Rating Stabilization at the Ssang-chi Gauging Station." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 30, No. 1B, pp. 81-87.

17.
Lee, S.H., and Gang, S.U. (2001). "Stream Discharge Estimation by Hydraulic Channel Routing and Stage Measurement." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 543-549.

18.
MLIT (2008). Technical report of the Yodo River basin (volume of the Katsura River), Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism, Japan (in Japanese)

19.
MOLIT (2011, 2012). Hydrological survey report: I. the part of discharge investigation, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Republic of Korea (in Korean)

20.
Pelletier, M.P. (1987). "Uncertainties in the determination of river discharge: a literature review." Can. J. Civ. Eng., Vol. 15, p. 834-850.

21.
Tawik, M., Ibrahim, A., and Fahmy, H. (1997). "Hysteresis sensitive neural network for modeling rating curves." Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 206-211. crossref(new window)

22.
Reh, W., and Scheffler, B. (1996). "Significance and tests confidence intervals for tests and coefficient of variation." the statistical software newslettes

23.
Reitan, T., and Petersen-Overleir, A. (2008) "Bayesian power-law regression with a location parameter, with applications for construction of discharge rating curves." Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 351-365. crossref(new window)

24.
Reitan, T., and Petersen-Overleir, A. (2009), "Bayesian Methods for Estimating Multi-segment Discharge Rating Curves." Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 627-642. crossref(new window)

25.
Reitan, T., and Petersen-Overleir, A. (2011). "Dynamic Rating Curve Assessment in Unstable Rivers Using Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes." Water Resources Research, Vol. 47, W02524, No. 14, doi:10.1029/2010WR009504 crossref(new window)

26.
USGS (1982). Measurement and computation of streamflow: Vol. 2, Computation of discharge, Water Supply Paper 2175

27.
Westphal, J.A., Stevens, G.T., and Strauser, C.N. (1999) "Stage-Discharge Relations on the Middle Mississippi River." Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 125, No. 1, pp. 48-53. crossref(new window)