JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Stakeholder's Valuation of Public PMO System Using Laddering
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Stakeholder's Valuation of Public PMO System Using Laddering
Back, Hyung-Chung; Park, Chan-Hyuk; Jang, Seong-Yong; Kim, Ja-Hee;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The e-government project management consignment system to allow the public PMO has been introduced to resolve the quality management issue and the business risk, pointed out by the reorganized Software Industry Promotion Act. The additional regulation improvements are demanded because the public PMO system cannot settle down due to the different opinions among related parties: owner, operator and PMO. Therefore, to make balanced regulation improvements, the in-depth studies are necessary to analyze the fundamental causes of the disagreement between the related parties. This study analyses the each related party's cognitive structure to perform public PMO successfully and the fundamental reasons that cause the different opinions by applying the cognitive psychological Means-end chain theory, the laddering technique and the HVM, Hierarchical Value Map. In addition, this study analyses the regulations required for the related parties to obtain the expected benefits.
 Keywords
Public PMO;Content Analysis;Laddering;Value System;HVM (Hierarchical Value Map);
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
Analysis of Success Factors for Mobile Commerce using Text Mining and PLS Regression, Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 2016, 21, 11, 127  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
강진숙 외, "청소년의 TV중독 예방을 위한 미디어교육 방안 연구", 언론과학연구, 제11권 제4호, pp. 35-67, 2011.

2.
공공정보화전략포럼, "공공정보화 정책 간담회", 2015.

3.
김광수 외, "이동전화의 이용에 따른 결과와 가치의 탐색", 한국언론학회, 제50권 제1호, pp. 60-90, 2006.

4.
서배선, "공공부문 PMO 도입 의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구", 박사학위논문, 숭실대학교, 2013.

5.
이성몽, "PMO서비스와 PMO 역량이 프로젝트 성과에 미치는 영향", 박사학위논문, 국민대학교, 2013.

6.
정보화진흥원, "전자정부사업관리 위탁(PMO) 도입.운영 가이드", 2013.

7.
차환주 외, "RGT와 AHP을 활용한 이행 PMO 역량평가 모형", 한국IT서비스학회, 제14권 제2호, pp. 87-102. 2015.

8.
Artto, K., Kulvik, I., Poskela, J. and Turkulainen, V., "The integrative role of the project management office in the front end of innovation", International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 408-421, 2011. crossref(new window)

9.
Aubry, M., Hobbs, B. and Thuillier, D., "A new framework for understanding organisational project management through the PMO", International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 328-336, 2007. crossref(new window)

10.
Back, H.C., A Priority Analysis on Influential Factors for the Success of Project Management Office (PMO) in Public Sectors based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), dissertation, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, pp. 11-29, 2014.

11.
Dai, C.X. and Wells, W.G., "An exploration of project management office features and the relationship to project performance", International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 523-532, 2004. crossref(new window)

12.
Desouza, K.C. and Evaristo, J.R., "Project management offices : A case of knowledge-based archetypes", International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 414-423, 2006. crossref(new window)

13.
Devi Jankowicz, The Easy Guide to Repertory Grids, Wiley, Graduate Besiness School University of Luton, , pp. 146-168, 2004.

14.
Han, H.S., Lee, J.N. and Seo, Y.W., "Analyzing the impact of a firm's capability on outsourcing success: A process perspective", Information and Management, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 31-42, 2008. crossref(new window)

15.
Hill, G.M., "Evolving the project management office : A competency continuum", Information Systems Management, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 45-51, 2004.

16.
Kim K.S., Kim H.J. and Tak J.Y., "Cognitive structure of voters of political candidates", J Korean Society for Journal & Communication Studies 48, pp. 243-270, 2004.

17.
Kim, J.G. and Yoon, O.S., "A study on PMO functions that affect project performance enhancement", Proceedings of the Korea Society, Vol. 2010, No. 1, pp. 305-310, 2010.

18.
Liu, L. and Yetton, P., "The contingent effects on project performance of conducting project reviews and deploying project management offices", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 789-799, 2007. crossref(new window)

19.
Ministry of Security and Public Administration, Electronic government act enforcement or dinance amendment, Presidential Decree No. 24654, 2013.

20.
Ministry of Security and Public Administration, Public hearing for introduction of PMO in public sectors, 2013.

21.
Ministry of Security and Public Administration, Regulations on e-government project management commitment, Ministry of Security and Public Administration Announcement, No. 2013-32, 2013.

22.
Guide, A., Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK(R)Guide), 4th Edition, Project Management Institute, pp. 6-7, 2008.

23.
Qing-lan, C. and Chang-wei, M., "Project management mechanism mediates the influence of business strategy on corporate performance", Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2008(WiCOM'08), 4th International Conference on, IEEE, pp. 1-6, 2008.

24.
Reynolds T.J. and Gutman, J., "Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation", Journal of Advertising Research 28, pp. 11-31, 1988.

25.
Reynolds, T.J. and Olson, J.C., Understanding Consumer Decision Making: The Means-End Approach to Marketing and Advertising Strategy, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers Mahwah, NJ, pp. 3-20, 2001.