Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Study on Establishment of the Directions of Granting Incentives by Long-life Housing-related parties
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Study on Establishment of the Directions of Granting Incentives by Long-life Housing-related parties
Kim, Eun-Young; Jang, Soon-Gak; Hwang, Eun-Kyoung;
  PDF(new window)
Long-life housing means a housing which structural members (Support) such as columns and floor are maintained for a long period of time and the housing can be used for approximately 100 years by replacing components (Infill) such as walls and furniture. The government established "Certification standards of long-life housing construction" on December 24, 2014, requiring the long-life housing certification for construction of apartment houses for over 1,000 households. However, it is necessary to prepare an incentive measure which could be granted to construction related personnel and housing owners due to the effectiveness of such system and recognition that the initial construction cost of long-life housing is high. The purpose of this study is as follows. First, the reasons and necessity of long-life housing cost increase for each construction company, housing owner, infill component manufacturer and designer which are long-life housing related personnel are determined. The direction of incentive grant for supplying long-life housing based on the determined items is established. The result of this study is as follows. First, a special treatment which is higher than the alleviation of construction standards according to the previous ordinance is necessary for construction companies to secure the business feasibility. Also, incentives such as the provision of service space and wide balcony are necessary to improve the preference level of parceling out. Second, financial incentives such as financial support for housing purchase, reduction and exemption of tax (acquisition tax and registration tax), and support of maintenance cost are required for house owners. Third, it is essential to increase opportunities to participate in the market for infill component manufacturers by applying additional points for PQ. Fourth, it is needed to provide compensation for additional human resource and time at the time of designing to designers by preparing the long-life housing design cost standards.
Long-life Housing;Certification System;Incentive;
 Cited by
장수명주택 품질 수준 향상을 위한 인증제도 개선 연구,우수진;황은경;김은영;김수암;

대한건축학회논문집:계획계, 2016. vol.32. 8, pp.77-85 crossref(new window)
장수명 주택 인증제도 개선을 위한 전문가 의견조사 연구,김은영;황은경;정윤혜;

KIEAE Journal, 2017. vol.17. 6, pp.97-105 crossref(new window)
A Study on the Improvement of Certification System for Improving the Quality Level of Long-life Housing, Journal of the architectural institute of Korea planning & design, 2016, 32, 8, 77  crossref(new windwow)
김태섭, 저에너지 주택공급 활성화를 위한 제도개선 방안, 주택산업연구원, 2015

김호준, 도로사선 규제 폐지에 따른 사회경제적 효과분석 연구, 서울건축산업연구원, 2014

배순영, 녹색소비 인센티브 제도의 문제점과 개선방안, 한국소비자원 소비자정책동향보고서 제19호, 2010

한국건설기술연구원 외, 공동주택 생애주기에 따른 중장기 관리전략 연구보고서, 국토교통부, 2013

한국토지주택공사 외, 내구성 및 가변성을 가지는 장수명 공동 주택 기술개발 연구보고서, 국토해양부, 한국건설교통기술평가원, 2010

김수암, 양현정, 장수명 주택 인증제도의 내용과 특성, 한국주거학회 2015 추계학술발표대회 논문집 제27권 제2호, 2015

박수로, 김은영, 황은경, 국내 장수명 주택 연구의 특성 및 경향, 한국주거학회 2014 추계학술발표대회 논문집 제26권 제2호, 2014

박희택, 오치돈, 박찬식, 최진우, 공공공사의 PQ 심사 시 안전평가체계 비교분석, 건설정책저널 통권12호, 2013

이보라, 김수암, 황은경, 장수명 공동주택의 활성화를 위한 제도 개선 방안에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회 논문집 계획계, 제24권 제3호, 2008

이용규, 박영기, 이훈, Open Building System 주택의 공급방식을 위한 Skeleton & Infill 기술의 분석에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 제19권 제1호, 2003

이용규, 일본 SI집합주택 가변인필 시스템의 구성체계 분석, 한국주거학회논문집 제20권 제3호, 2009

서울시 지구단위계획수립기준, 서울특별시, 2015