JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
THE COMPARATIVE STUDY FOR THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF DENTAL ADHESIVES CURED WITH VARIOUS LIGHT SOURCES
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
THE COMPARATIVE STUDY FOR THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF DENTAL ADHESIVES CURED WITH VARIOUS LIGHT SOURCES
Choi, Nam-Ki; Cho, Seong-Hoon; Kim, Seon-Mi;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the shear bond strengths of five dentin adhesive systems cured with three different light curing sources. Seventy five noncarious permanent teeth were collected and stored in an 0.1% thymol solution at room temperature after extraction. The tested adhesives were: Adper Scotchbond Multi-purpose Plus Adhesive (SM) Adper Single bond 2 (SB), Clearfil SE Bond (SE), Adper Prompt L-Pop (PL), G-Bond (GB). And three light curing unit systems were used: Elipar Free light 2(LED), OptiLux 501 (Halogen), Flipo (PAC). For the shear bonding test, the labial and lingual surfaces of permanent teeth were used. To obtain a flat dentin surface, the labial and lingual surfaces of the teeth were sanded on SiO2 with number 600 grit and then divided into 15 groups of 10 surfaces each. All samples were theromocycled in water and for 1000 cycles. The results were as follows: 1. When cured with Freelight 2, the shear bond strength of SM was significantly higher than that of PL, GB (p<0.05), whereas no significant difference was found among those of any other bonding agents. 2. When cured with Optilux 501, the shear bond strength of SM was significantly higher than those of any other bonding agents (p<0.05), whereas no singnificant difference was found among those of andy other bonding agents. 3. When cured with Flipo, the shear bond strength of SM was significantly higher than those of SB, SE, GB (p<0.05), whereas no significant differences was found among those of any other bonding agents. 4. For comparison according to three different light cure unit system, except SB and GB, each three dentin bonding agents showed no significant difference. For SB, only Freelight 2 was significantly higher than the others, with no significant difference between Optilux 501 and Flip. For GB, Statistically significant difference was found only between Freelight and Flipo.
 Keywords
Dentin bonding system;Light curing system;Shear bond strength;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Pires JF, Cvitko E, Denehy GE, et al. : Effects of curing tip distance on light intensity and composite resin microhardness. Quintessence Int, 24: 517-521, 1993.

2.
오유향, 박윤경, 이난영 등 : 광중합 광원의 종류와 조사시간에 따른 치면열구전색제의 미반응 모노머 용출. 대한소아치과학회지 31:421-430, 2004.

3.
Roberson TM, Heymann H, Swift EJ : Operative dentistry 4th ed. Mosby, Inc. St. Louis, 177-211, 2002.

4.
대한치과보존학회 : 치과보존학. 신흥인터내셔날, 서울, 231-266, 2001.

5.
Althoff O, Hartung M : Advances in light curing. Am J Dent, 13:77-81, 2000.

6.
최남기, 양규호, 김선미 등 : 다양한 광원에 의한 광중합형 수복물질의 미세경도에 관한 연구. 대한소아치과학회지 32:634-643, 2005.

7.
권민석, 정태성, 김신 : 광원의 유형에 따른 광중합 수복재의 중합양상. 대한소아치과학회지 30:229-236, 2003.

8.
박창후, 최남기, 양규호 등 : 광중합기 종류에 따른 복합레진과 콤포머의 미세누출에 관한 연구. 대한소아치과학회지 33:438-445, 2006.

9.
문현정, 임범순, 이용근 등 : 콤포짓트 레진의 중합체계에 따른 중합률 및 잔류 단량체의 유출. 대한치과기자재학회지 28:169-178, 2001.

10.
Hannig M, Bott B : In-vitro pulp chamber temperature rise during composite resin polymerization with various light-curing sources. Dent Mater 15:275-281, 1999. crossref(new window)

11.
Uhl A, Mills RW, Jandt KD : Polymerization and light-induced heat of dental composites cured with LED and halogen technology. Biomater 24:1809-1820, 2003. crossref(new window)

12.
Tarle Z, Meniga A, Knezevic A, et al. : Composite conversion and temperature rise using a conventional, plasma arc, and an experimental blue LED curing unit. J Oral Rehabil 29:662-667, 2002. crossref(new window)

13.
Barghi N, Berry T, Hatton C : Evaluating intensity output of curing lights in private dental offices. J Am Dent Assoc 125:992-996, 1994. crossref(new window)

14.
Oberholzer TG, Preez ICD, Kidd M : Effect of LED curing on the microleakage, shear bond strength and surface hardness of a resin-based composite restoration. Biomater 26:3981-3986, 2005. crossref(new window)

15.
Attar N, Korkmaz Y : Effect of two light-emitting diode(LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 8(2):080-088, 2007.

16.
Uhl A, Michaelis C, Mills RW, et al. : The influence of storage and indenter load on the Knoop hardness of dental composites polymerized with LED and halogen technologies. 20:21-28, 2004. crossref(new window)

17.
Dunn WJ, Bush AC : A comparison of polymerization by light-emitting diode and halogen-based lightcuring units. J Am Dent Assoc. 133:335-341, 2002. crossref(new window)

18.
Mills RW, Uhl A, Blackwell GB, et al. : High power light emitting diode (LED) arrays versus halogen light polymerization of oral biomaterials: Barcol hardness, compressive strength and radiometric properties. Biomater 23:2955-2963, 2002. crossref(new window)

19.
Stahl F, Ashworth SH, Jandt KD, et al. : Lightemitting diode (LED) polymerisation of dental composites: flexural properties and polymerisation potential. Biomater 21:1379-1385, 2000. crossref(new window)

20.
Swanson T, Dunn WJ, Childers DE, et al. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with light-emitting diode curing units at various polymerization times. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125:337-41, 2004. crossref(new window)

21.
Nomoto R, Asada M, McCabe JF, et al. : Light exposure required for optimum conversion of light activated resin systems. Dent mater 22:1135-1142, 2006. crossref(new window)

22.
Sfondrini MF, Cacciafest V, Scribante A, et al : Effect of light-tip distance on the shear bond strengths of resin-modified glass ionomer cured with high-intensity halogen, light-emitting diode and plasma arc lights. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129:541-546, 2006. crossref(new window)

23.
Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, et al. : Effect of light-tip distance on the shear bond strengths of composite resin. Angle Orthod 75:386-391, 2005.

24.
김민수, 김종수, 유승훈 : 수종의 광중합기를 이용한 교정용 광중합형 글라스 아이오노머 시멘트의 전단 결합 강도에 관한 연구. 대한소아치과학회지 34:81-89, 2007.

25.
Pettemerides AP, Ireland AJ, Sherriff M : An Ex Vivo Investigation into the use of a plasma arc lamp when using a visible light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement in orthodontic bonding. J Orthod 28:237-244, 2001. crossref(new window)

26.
Oesterle LJ, Newman SM, Shellhart WC : Rapid curing of bonding composite with a xenon plasma arc light. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119:610-616, 2001. crossref(new window)

27.
Thind BS, Stirrups DR, Lloyd CH : A comparison of tungsten-quartz-halogen, plasma arc and light-emitting diode light sources for the polymerization of an orthodontic adhesive. Europ J Orthod 28:78-82, 2006.

28.
Signorelli MD, Kao E, Ngan PW, et al. : Comparison of bond strength between orthodontic brackets bonded with halogen and plasa arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129(2):277-82, 2006 Feb. crossref(new window)

29.
Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Pistorio A, et al. : Effects of conventional and high-intensity light curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119:30-35, 2001. crossref(new window)

30.
Manzo B, Liistro G, De Clerck H et al. : Clinical trial comparing plasma arc and conventional halogen curing lights for orthodontic bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125:30-35, 2004. crossref(new window)

31.
Yoon TH, Lee BS, Lim BS, et al. : Degree of polymerization of resin composites by different light sources. J Oral Rehabil 29:1165-1173, 2002. crossref(new window)

32.
Buonocore M : A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res, 34:849-853, 1955. crossref(new window)

33.
Davison CL, de Gee AJ, Felizer A : The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and polymerization constraction stress. J Dent Res 63:1396-1399, 1984. crossref(new window)

34.
Munksgaard EC, Irie M, Asmussen E : Dentin-polymer bond prompted by Gluma and various resins. J Dent Res 64:1409-1411, 1985. crossref(new window)

35.
Ateyah NZ, Elhejazi AA : Shear bond strengths and microleakage of four types of dentin adhesive materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 5:63-73, 2004.

36.
Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, et al. : Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional one-step and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 29:55-61, 2001. crossref(new window)

37.
Soderholm KJ, Guelmann M, bimstein E : Shear bond strength of one 4th and 7th generation bonding experiences. J Adhes Dent 7:57-64, 2005.

38.
Atash R, Abbeele AVD : Bond strengths of eight contemporary adhesives to enamel and to dentine in vitro study on bovine primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent, 15:264-273, 2005. crossref(new window)

39.
Hansen EK, Asumussen E. Reliability of three dental radiometers. Scand J Dent Res 101(2):115-119, 1993.

40.
김선영, 이인복, 조병훈 등 : Light emitting diode로 광조사한 상아질 접착제의 상아질 전단접착강도와 중합률에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 29:504-514, 2004. crossref(new window)

41.
Miyazaki M, Hattori T, Ichiishi Y et al. : Evaluaiton of curing units used in private dental offices. Oper Dent 23:50-54, 1998.

42.
Leonard DL, Charlton DG, Hilton TJ : Effect of curing tip diameter on the accuracy of dental radiometers. Oper Dent 24:31-37, 1999.

43.
Cook WD : Spectral distribution of dental photopolymerization sources. J Dent Res 61:1436-1438, 1982. crossref(new window)

44.
McCabe JF, Carnick TE : Ountput from visible-light activation units and depth of cure of light-activated composites. J Dent Res 68:1534-1539, 1989. crossref(new window)

45.
Nomoto R : Effect of light wavelength on polymerization of light-cured resins. Dent Mater J 16:60-73, 1997. crossref(new window)

46.
Fujibayashi K, Ishimaru K, Takahashi N et al. : Newly developed curing unit using blue light-emitting diodes. Dent Jap 34:49-53, 1998.

47.
Mills RW, Jandt KD, Ashworth SH : Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting diode (LED) technology. Br Dent J 186:388-391, 1994.

48.
Mills RW, Uhl A, Jandt KD : Optical power outputs, spectral and dental composite depths of cure obtained with blue light emitting diode (LED) and halogen light curing units (LCUs). Br Dent J 193:459-463, 2002. crossref(new window)

49.
Brackett WW, Haisch LD, Covey DA : Effect of plasma arc curing on the micro -leakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent, 13:121-122, 2000.

50.
Rueggeberg FA, Ergle JW, Mettenburg DJ : Polymerization depths of con- temporary light-curing units using microhardness. J Esthet Dent. 2000;12(6):340-9. crossref(new window)

51.
Roberts WW, Haisch LD, Covey DA : Effect of plasma arc curing on the micro-leakage of Class V resinbased composite restorations. Am J Dent, 13:121-122, 2000.

52.
Hofmann N, Hugo, Schubert K : Comparison between a plasma arc light source and conventional halogen curing units regarding flexural strength, modulus, and hardness of photoactivated resin composites. Clin Oral Investig, 4:140-147, 2000. crossref(new window)

53.
Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A, Asmussen E : Characterization of resin composites polymerized with plasma arc curing units. Dent mater 16:330-336, 2000. crossref(new window)