JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Survey on Preferences Regarding Rubber Dams in Children, Adolescents and Parents
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Survey on Preferences Regarding Rubber Dams in Children, Adolescents and Parents
Jeong, Hankeul; Lee, Nanyoung; Lee, Sangho;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The use of a rubber dam is a useful technique for protecting patients and operators, producing good results when treating children and adolescent patients. Despite its many advantages, some children and adolescent patients have negative feelings and sometimes express its discomfort. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patients' preferences for rubber dam use and the associated factors that may affect it. A survey was conducted targeting patients aged 4-18 years old who visited the pediatric dental clinic, the restorative dental clinic, or the student treatment dental clinic of University Dental Hospital, and were treated using a rubber dam without sedation. We collected questionnaires through electronic medical records. Most children and adolescent patients showed positive attitudes towards using rubber dams. The group with a short treatment time and the group with past knowledge or experience of rubber dam use showed more positive attitudes towards rubber dams (p < 0.05), while no significant difference was found among factors such as gender, age, procedure, anesthetics, treatment site, and operator (p > 0.05).
 Keywords
Rubber dams;Isolation;Subjective preferences;Children;Adolescents;Parents;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Abrams RA, Drake CW, Segal H : Dr. Sandford C Barnum and the invention of rubber dam. Gen Dent, 30:320-322, 1982.

2.
Ganss C, Klimek J, Gleim A : One year clinical evaluation of the retention and quality of two fluoride releasing sealants. Clin Oral Investig, 3:188-193, 1999. crossref(new window)

3.
Lambriandis T, Beltaes P : Accidental swallowing of endodontic instruments. Endod Dent Traumatol, 12:301-304, 1996. crossref(new window)

4.
Berglund A, Molin M : Mercury levels in plasma and urine after removal of all amalgam restorations - the effect of using rubber dam. Dent Mater, 13:297-304, 1997. crossref(new window)

5.
Cochran MA, Miller CH, Sheldrake MA : The efficacy of rubber dam as a barrier to the spread of microorganisms during dental treatment. J Am Dent Assoc, 119:141-144, 1989. crossref(new window)

6.
Lygidakis NA, Oulis KI, Christodoulidis A : Evaluation of fissure sealants retention following four different isolation and surface preparation techniques - four years clinical trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 19:23-25, 1994.

7.
Ammann P, Kolb A, Lussi A, Seemann R : Influence of rubber dam on objective and subjective parameters of stress during dental treatment of children and adolescents - a randomized controlled clinical pilot study. Int J Paediatr Dent, 23:110-115, 2013. crossref(new window)

8.
European Society of Endodontology : Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment; consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J, 39:921-930, 2006. crossref(new window)

9.
Korean academy of pediatric dentistry : Pediatric dentistry, 5th ed. Yenang, Inc, Seoul, p341-343, 2014.

10.
Whitworth JM, Seccombe GV, Shoker K, Steele JG : Use of rubber dam and irrigant selection in UK general dental practice. Int Endod J, 33:435-441, 2009.

11.
McKay A, Farman M, Rodd H, Zaitoun H : Pediatric dental patients'attitudes to rubber dam. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 38:139-141, 2013. crossref(new window)

12.
Yi SH, Kim JB, Jang KT, Kim CC : A case study of various clinical application of the rubber dam in pediatric dentistry. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 24:549-555, 1997.

13.
Park MR, Mah YJ, Ahn BD : Study on adatability of rubber dam clamps on primary second molars in korean children. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 40:98-105, 2013. crossref(new window)

14.
Stewardson DA, McHugh ES : Patients'attitudes to rubber dam. Int Endod J, 35:812-819, 2002. crossref(new window)

15.
Filipovic J, Jukic S, Anic I, et al. : Patient's attitude to rubber dam use. Acta Stomatol Croat, 38:319-322, 2004.

16.
Masaoka Y, Homma I : The effect of anticipatory anxiety on breathing and metabolism in humans. Respir Physiol, 128:171-177, 2001. crossref(new window)

17.
Massot B, Balteneck N, McAdams E, et al. : Objective evaluation of stress with the blind by the monitoring of autonomic nervous system activity. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 1429-1432, 2010.

18.
Hayashi N, Someya N, Fukuba Y, et al. : Vascular responses to fear-induced stress in humans. Physiol Behav, 98:441-446, 2009. crossref(new window)

19.
Cuthbert MI, Melamed BG : A screening device - children at risk for dental fears and management problems. ASDC J Dent Child, 49:432-436, 1982.

20.
Castro FLA, Reges RV, Bruno KF, et al. : Improving patient care: alternative rubber dam isolation methods. Rev Odontol Bras Central, 21:538-542, 2012.