Advanced SearchSearch Tips
MCS/IEI Prevalence Rate of Workers Around an Accidental Release of Hydrogen Fluoride in Gumi Industrial Complex
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
MCS/IEI Prevalence Rate of Workers Around an Accidental Release of Hydrogen Fluoride in Gumi Industrial Complex
Han, Hye-Ji; Woo, Kuck-Hyeun; Choi, Sung-Yong; Jeon, Byoung-Hak; Choi, Sangjun;
  PDF(new window)
Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence rate of multiple chemical sensitivity/idiopathic environmental intolerance(MCS/IEI) among workers in the Gumi industrial complex around the region of accidental release of hydrogen fluoride in 2012. Materials: We evaluated MCS/IEI using the Korean version of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory(QEESI). A total of 535 workers at six manufacturing companies in the Gumi industrial complex were investigated using self-administered questionnaires from February to March 2015. After exclusion of incompletely answered questionnaires, 271 were analyzed. Results: The prevalence rate and proved positive rate of MCS/IEI were 5.9%(16 out of 271) and 3.7%(10 out of 271), respectively. The scores of chemical intolerance, other intolerance, symptom severity and life impact were significantly higher(p<0.05) in females than those of males. In terms of masking index scores, males showed significantly higher(p=0.003) than female. The self-reported MCS/IEI prevalence rate, 7.7%, of workers exposed to hydrogen fluoride in 2012 was higher than no-exposure group(5.6%), but not statistically significant(p=0.815). Conclusions: Although the prevalence rate of MCS/IEI symptoms of workers exposed to hydrogen fluoride gas in 2012 was not significantly higher than no-exposure group, it is necessary to conduct follow-up study on the exposure group of hydrogen fluoride.
industrial complex;MCS/IEI;QEESI;symptom prevalence rate;
 Cited by
Adverse Effects on Crops and Soils Following an Accidental Release of Hydrogen Fluoride and Hydrofluoric Acid, Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 2016, 49, 6, 651  crossref(new windwow)
Bell IR, Schwartz GE, Peterson JM, Amend D. Self-reported illness from chemical odors in young adults without clinical syndromes or occupational exposures. Arch Environ Health 1993;48:6-13 crossref(new window)

Chae HC, Kim BK, Kim HC, Lee MY, Lim JH. Multiple chemical sensitivity. The Korean Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2012; 24(4):328-338

Hausteiner C, Bornschein S, Hansen J, Zilker T, Forstl H. Self-reported chemical sensitivity in Germany: a population-based survey. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2005;208(4):271 crossref(new window)

Hojo S, Kumano H, Yoshino H, Kakuta K, Ishikawa S. Application of quick environment exposure sensitivity inventory(QEESI) for Japanese population: study of reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Toxicol Ind Health 2003;19: 41-9 crossref(new window)

Hojo S, Ishikawa S, Kumano H, Miyata M, Sakabe K. Clinical characteristics of physician-diagnosed patients with multiple chemical sensitivity in Japan. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2008;211:682-9 crossref(new window)

Ishikawa S, Miyata M. Multiple chemical sensitivitycriteria nd test methods for diagnosis. Allergology & mmunology 1999;6:990-8

Jeon BH, Lee SH, Kim HA. A validation of the Korean version of QEESI(the quick environmental exposure and sensitivity inventory. The Korean Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2012; 24(1):96-114

Kim HA, Ann KD, Heo Y. Quality Evaluation of Indoor Air Pollutants at Public Facilities and Its Association with Health Effects. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation. 2007

Lim HS, Lee K. Health care plan for hydrogen fluoride spill, Gumi, Korea. J of Korean Med Sci 2012;27(11): 1283-1284 crossref(new window)

Manabe R, Kunugita N, Katoh T, Kuroda Y, Akiyama Y et al. Questionnaire survey of workers in specific buildings regarding multiple chemical sensitivity. Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi 2008;63(4):717-23 crossref(new window)

Martini A, Iavicoli S, Corso L. Multiple chemical sensitivity and the workplace: current position and need for an occupational health surveillance protocol. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2013;351457

Miller CS, Prihoda TJ. A controlled comparison of symptoms and chemical intolerances reported by Gulf war veterans, implant recipientsand persons with multiple chemical sensitivity. Toxicol Health 1999;15:386-97 crossref(new window)

Miller CS, Prihoda TJ. The environment exposure and sensitivity inventory(EESI): a standardized approach for measuring chemical intolerances for research and clinical applications. Toxicol Health 1999;15:370-85 crossref(new window)

Nordin S, Andersson L. Evaluation of a swedish version of the quick environmental exposure and sensitivity inventory. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2010;83: 95-104 crossref(new window)

Saito M, Kumano H, Yoshiuchi K, Kokubo N, Ohashi K et al. Symptom profile of multiple chemical sensitivity in actual life. Psychosomc Med 2005;67:318-25 crossref(new window)

Skovbjerg S, Berg ND, Elberling J, Christensen KB. Evaluation of the quick environmental exposure and sensitivity inventory in a Danish population. J Environ Public Health 2012;2012:304-14

Winder C. Mechanisms of multiple chemical sensitivity. Toxicol Lett 2002;123(1-3):85-97

Woo KH, Park JY, Jeon BH, Wang SJ, Yang WH et al. Step 3 Health Survey After Hydrogen Fluoride Spill Accident. National Institute of Environmental Reasarch. 2013