JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Characteristics of Sourdough Bread Prepared using Bifidobacterium longum, Enterococcus faecium, and Lactobacillus acidophilus as a Combination Starter
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Korean Journal of Food Preservation
  • Volume 18, Issue 1,  2011, pp.91-97
  • Publisher : The Korean Society of Food Preservation
  • DOI : 10.11002/kjfp.2011.18.1.091
 Title & Authors
Characteristics of Sourdough Bread Prepared using Bifidobacterium longum, Enterococcus faecium, and Lactobacillus acidophilus as a Combination Starter
Chae, Dong-Jin; Lee, Kwang-Suck; Jang, Ki-Hyo;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The influence of two process parameters (starter and fermentation period) on sourdough bread qualities was investigated. Bifidobacterium longum/Enterococcus faecium/Lactobacillus acidophilus (a mixed culture) was used as a starter. The five production conditions tested were: Control (sourdough fermentation with yeast); LAB 1(fermentation with mixed culture); LAB 2 (fermentation with yeast and mixed culture, respectively); LAB 3 (fermentation with yeast and mixed culture); and LAB 4 (first fermentation with yeast and mixed culture, respectively, followed by a second fermentation using the combination). The LAB 4 process showed the most favorable fermentation characteristics upon CrumbScan analysis, and the highest specific bread volume (5.14 mL/g). These results were reflected in the sensory evaluation of bread produced by the LAB 4 process; the bread achieved an excellent overall acceptance ranking of 3.7. Upon firmness analysis, the LAB 2, LAB 3, and LAB 4 bread figures were 113.67 g, 111.97 g, and 113.50 g, respectively. Thus, the firmness of LAB 2, LAB 3, and LAB 4 bread was higher than that of the control (93.20 g), although the aroma compounds of bread produced by the five processes did not differ. These results show that LAB 4 bread had improved sourdough properties, compared to control.
 Keywords
Bifidobacterium;probiotics;sourdough bread;sourdough starter;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Gobbetti M (1988) The sourdough microflora: Interactions of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts. Trends Food Sci Technol, 9, 267-274

2.
Gul H, Ozcelik S, Sagdie O, Certel M (2005) Sourdough bread production with lactobacilli and S. cerevisiae isolated from sourdoughs. Process Biochem, 40, 691-697 crossref(new window)

3.
Kline L, Sugihara TF (1971) Microorganism of the SanFrancisco sour dough process II, Isolation and characterization of undescribed bacterial species responsible for the souring activity. Appl Microbial, 21, 459-465

4.
Meignen B, Onno B, Gélinas P, Infantes M, Guilois S (2001) Optimization of sourdough fermentation with Lactobacillus brevis and baker's yeast. Food Microbiol, 18, 239-245 crossref(new window)

5.
Wehrle K, Arendt EK (1988) Rheological changes in wheat sourdough during controlled and spontaneous fermentation. Cereal Chem, 75, 882-886

6.
Wick M, Stolz P, Bocker G, Lebeault JM (2003) Influence of several process parameters on sourdough fermentation. Acta Biotechnol, 23, 51-61 crossref(new window)

7.
Chang JH, Ann JB (1996) Effect of lactic acid bacteria on the qualities of white pan bread. Korean J Food Nutr, 9, 509-515

8.
Heunsen A, Schieberle P (2005) Generation of aroma compounds during sourdough fermentation : applied and fundamental aspects. Trends Food Sci Technol, 16, 85-94 crossref(new window)

9.
Galal AM, Johnson JA, Vamiano ME (1977) Lactic acid volatile(C2-C5) organic acids of Sanfrancisco sourdough french bread. Cereal Chem, 55, 461-468

10.
Nachf OS (1995) Sourdough or sour dough Baking & Snack, 17, 86

11.
Decock P, Cappelle P (2005) Bread technology and sourdough technology, Trends Food Sci Technol, 16, 113-120 crossref(new window)

12.
김웅일 (2000) 사워도 만들기. 월간 제과제빵, 105, 122-125

13.
Choi KO, Nguyen HH, Kwak HS (2010) The role of the immune system in the use of probiotic lactic acid bacteria in preventing and treating allergic diseases. Korean J Food Sci Ani Resour, 30, 1-12 crossref(new window)

14.
AACC (1995) Approved methods of the AACC, 9th ed, Method 02-25 : pH and TTA determinations. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN, USA

15.
Corsetti A, Gobbetti M, Balestrieri F, Paoletti F, Russi J, Russi L (1998) Sourdough lactic acid bacteria effects on bread firmness and staling. J Food Sci, 63, 347-351

16.
Pyler EJ (1988) Physiological and chemical test methods. In: Baking Science & Technology, 3rd ed, Vol. 2, Sosland Publishing Company, KS, USA, p 903-907

17.
Albright SC, Winston WL, Zappe C (1999) Data analysis and decision making with Microsoft Excel. Pacific Grove, Calif. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co, California, USA

18.
Lee KS (2001) Studies on the evaluation of fermented white pan bread by digital image analysis. PhD thesis, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea

19.
Don Pickering (1996) Evaluate product crumb accurately. Bakery Production and Marketing, January 15

20.
Wiggins C (1988) Proving baking and cooling. In: Technology of breadmaking. Thomson Science, NY, USA, p 133-136

21.
Lee KS, Noh WS (2002) Objective measurement of characteristics of white pan bread using a commercial Korean wheat flour. Korean J Soc Food Cookery Sci, 18, 206-210

22.
Chae DJ, Lee KS, Jang KH (2010) Fermentation characteristics of flour sourdough using mixed lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacterium longum as starters. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life, 20, 743-750

23.
He H, Hoseney RC (1992) Effects of the quantity of wheat flour protein on bread loaf volume. Cereal Chem, 69, 17-19

24.
Barber B, Ortola C, Barber S, Fernande ZF (1992) Storage of packaged white bread. III. Effects of sour dough and addition of acids on bread characteristics. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch, 194, 442-449 crossref(new window)

25.
Martin ML (1989) Rethinking bread firmness. PhD thesis, Kansas State University, KS, USA