JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Microbial Inactivation of Chicken Cage Litter by Aqueous Chloride Dioxide
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Korean Journal of Food Preservation
  • Volume 18, Issue 1,  2011, pp.98-102
  • Publisher : The Korean Society of Food Preservation
  • DOI : 10.11002/kjfp.2011.18.1.098
 Title & Authors
Microbial Inactivation of Chicken Cage Litter by Aqueous Chloride Dioxide
Yu, Dong-Jin; Kim, Hyun-Jin; Song, Hyeon-Jeong; Shin, Yoon-Ji; Chae, Hyun-Seok; Song, Kyung-Bin;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
We evaluated microbial inactivation in chicken cage litter, to ensure microbial safety, using aqueous chloride dioxide. Contamination by coliforms, Escherichia coli, Listeria spp., yeasts and molds, total aerobic bacteria, and Salmonella spp. was detected in fresh cage litter, and microbial populations increased if litters were repeatedly used. Aqueous treatment (500 ppm) significantly decreased the populations of coliforms, E. coli, Listeria spp., yeasts and molds, total aerobic bacteria, and Salmonella spp. in all litter samples tested. In particular, aqueous treatment on fresh litter reduced the initial populations of coliform, E. coli, Listeria spp., yeasts and molds, and total aerobic bacteria by 4.47, 1.29, 1.23, 3.24, and 5.2 log CFU/g, respectively. In addition, when litters used for 1 and 5 weeks were tested, treatment significantly reduced microbial populations. The results suggest that aqueous treatment is useful to reduce microbial hazards in chicken cage litter and to improve the microbial safety of slaughtered chickens.
 Keywords
chicken cage litter;aqueous chloride dioxide;chicken;microbial safety;quality;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
오미자 수확 후 이산화염소수를 이용한 표면 세척에 따른 미생물 저감 효과,이슬;문혜경;이수원;문재남;이선호;김종국;

한국식품저장유통학회지, 2013. vol.20. 6, pp.871-876 crossref(new window)
1.
Enhanced antimicrobial effectiveness of Omija (Schizamdra chinesis Baillon) by ClO2(chlorine dioxide) treatment, Korean Journal of Food Preservation, 2013, 20, 6, 871  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Patsias A, Chouliara I, Badeka A, Savvaidis IN, Kontominas MG (2006) Shelf-life of a chilled precooked chicken product stored in air and under modified atmospheres: Microbiological, chemical, sensory attributes. Food Microbiol, 23, 423-429 crossref(new window)

2.
Chouliara E, Karatapanis A, Savvaidis IN, Kontominas MG (2007) Combined effect of oregano essential oil and modified atmosphere packaging on shelf-life extension of fresh chicken breast meat, stored at $4^{\circ}C$. Food Microbiol, 24, 607-617 crossref(new window)

3.
Hong YH, Ku KJ, Kim MK, Won MS, Chung KS, Song KB (2008) Survival of Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Salmonella typhimurium inoculated on chicken by aqueous chlorine dioxide treatment. J Microbiol Biotechnol, 18, 742-745

4.
Kim HJ, Chun HH, Kim JY, Jang SA, Lee BD, Chae HS, Song KB (2010) Identification of microorganisms isolated from wound regions of chickens. Korean J Food Preserv, 17, 301-306

5.
Davies RH, Wray C (1996) Determination of an effective sampling regime to detect Salmonella enteritidis in the environment of poultry units. Vet Microbiol, 50, 117-127 crossref(new window)

6.
Rose N, Beaudeau F, Drouin P, Toux JY, Rose V, Colin P (1999) Risk factors for Salmonella enterica subsp. Enterica contamination in french broiler-chicken flocks at the end of the rearing period. Prev Vet Med, 39, 265-277 crossref(new window)

7.
Park KJ, Park EJ, Kim JO, Kim YH (1995) Changes in the microflora on the surface of chicken meat during chilled and frozen storage. Korean J Anim Sci, 37, 279-286

8.
Owusu-Yaw J, Toth J, Wheeler W, Wei C (1990) Mutagenicity and identification of the reaction products of aqueous chlorine or chlorine dioxide with l-tryptophan. J Food Sci, 55, 1714-1719 crossref(new window)

9.
Kim JM (2001) Use of chlorine dioxide as a biocide in the food industry. Food Ind Nutr, 6, 33-39

10.
Rand JL, Hofmann R, Alam MZB, Chauret C, Cantwell R, Andrews RC, Gagnon GA (2007) A field study evaluation for mitigating biofouling with chlorine dioxide or chlorine integrated with UV disinfection. Water Res, 41, 1939-1948 crossref(new window)

11.
American Public Health Association (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed, American Public Health Association, Washington DC, p 4-54

12.
SAS (2001) The SAS system for windows. Version 8.2. Statistical Analysis System Institute, Cary, NC, USA

13.
Kelley T, Pancorbo O, Merka W, Thompson S, Cabrera M, Barnhart H (1995) Bacterial pathogens and indicators in poultry litter during reutilization. J Appl Poult Res, 4, 366-373 crossref(new window)

14.
Tamblyn K, Conner D, Bilgili S (1997) Utilization of the skin attachment model to determine the antibacterial efficacy of potential carcass treatments. Poult Sci, 76, 1318-1323 crossref(new window)

15.
Arshad N, Neubauer C, Hasnain S, Hess M (2008) Peganum harmala can minimize Escherichia coli infection in poultry, but long-term feeding may induce side effects. Poult Sci, 87, 240-249 crossref(new window)

16.
Hong YH, Ku GJ, Kim MK, Song KB (2008) Effect of aqueous chlorine dioxide treatment on the microbial growth and quality of chicken legs during storage. J Food Sci Nutr, 13, 45-50 crossref(new window)

17.
Hong YH, Ku GJ, Kim MK, Song KB (2007) Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes and Campylobacter jejuni in chicken by aqueous chlorine dioxide treatment. J Food Sci Nutr, 12, 279-283 crossref(new window)

18.
Hong YH, Kim MK, Song KB (2008) Effects of aqueous chlorine dioxide treatment on microbial safety and quality of Samgae chicken. Korean J Food Preserv, 15, 769-773