JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Perspective on Forest Conservation: A Case Study of Community at Gana Resettlement and Integrated Development Project (GRID), Sabah, Malaysia
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Perspective on Forest Conservation: A Case Study of Community at Gana Resettlement and Integrated Development Project (GRID), Sabah, Malaysia
Yahya, Hardawati; Idrus, Roszehan Mohd.; Talib, Hamimah; Fong, Eunice;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study was carried out in Gana Resettlement and Integrated Development (GRID) Project as a pioneer model for Community-Based Forest Management (CBFM) in Sabah, Malaysia. The GRID project is developed to improve community livelihood as well as to promote community involvement in CBFM and at the same time to lessen community encroachment and traditional farming practices inside the forest conservation area. The objectives of this study are: (i) to identify the dependency of local community on forest resources; (ii) to examine local community's roles in conserving forest resources and, (iii) to analyze their views on GRID project in conserving forest. Interviews were conducted with randomly selected 130 households at the GRID project using semi structured questionnaires comprising closed and open-ended questions. The study reveals that community dependency on forest resources have lessened after the resettlement of the GRID project. The community shows positive perspective on their contribution for conserving the forest resources. However, the community's willingness to contribute as well as their real contribution can be further improved. The study recommends the government to create more effective training and relevant activities to improve the livelihood of community as well as to increase their positive perception on forest conservation efforts. Further research to strengthen the relationship between local community and forest governance through forest conservation is also recommended.
 Keywords
community-based forest management;forest conservation;local community;participation;SWOT analysis;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Adhikari B, Di Falco S, Lovett JC. 2004. Household characteristics and forest dependency: evidence from common property forest management in Nepal. J Ecol Econ 48: 245-257. crossref(new window)

2.
Arifin B, Swallow BM, Suyanto S, Coe R. 2009. A conjoint analysis of farmer preferences for community forestry contracts in the Sumber Jaya Watershed, Indonesia.

3.
Atmis E, Ozden S, Lise W. 2007. Public participation in forestry in Turkey. J Ecol Econ 62: 352-359. crossref(new window)

4.
Baltodano J. 2008. Shared Characteristic of Successful Cases of Community-Based Forest Governance. In: Community-Based Forest Governance: From Resistance to Proposals for Sustainable Use (Baltodano J, Paz L, Wormworth J, eds). FoEI Secretariat, Netherlands.

5.
Boon E, Ahenkan A, Baduon BN. 2009. An Assessment of Forest Resources Policy and Management in Ghana. Paper presented in IAIA09 Conference Proceedings, Ipact Assessment and Human Well-Being 29th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 16-22 May 2009, Accra International Conference Center, Accra, Ghana.

6.
Chen H, Zhu T, Krott M, Maddox D. 2012. Community forestry management and livelihood development in Northwest China: integration of governance, project design, and community participation. J Reg Environ Change 10: 5-24.

7.
Guthiga PM. 2008. Understanding local communities' perception of existing forest management regimes of a kenyan rainforest. Int J Soc For 2: 145-166.

8.
Hoare AL. 2010. Communtiy-Based Forest Management in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A Fairytale of a Viable REDD Strategy? Forest Monitor, Cambridge, UK.

9.
Kota Marudu District Office. 2009. Kampung Gana. Sabah, Malaysia.

10.
Pandit R, Bevilazqua E. 2011. Forest users and environmental impacts of community forestry in the hills of Nepal. J For Pol Econ 13: 345-352. crossref(new window)

11.
Rahman MH, Fardusi MJ. 2012. Jannatul Fardusi. Indigenous plant utilization and farming system of garo tribe in north-east Bangladesh: a means of sustainable biodiversity conservation. J For Sc 28: 84-96.

12.
Rodriguez-Piñeros S, Focht W, Lewis DK, Montgomery D. 2012. Incorporating values into community-scale sustainable forest management plans: an application of Q methodology. Small-scale For 11: 167-183. crossref(new window)

13.
Sabah Forestry Department. 2005. Annual Report 2005. Sabah, Malaysia.

14.
Sabah Forestry Department. 2007. Annual Report 2007. Sabah, Malaysia.

15.
Sabah Forestry Department. 2009. Annual Report 2009. Sabah, Malaysia.

16.
Sabah Forestry Deparmtment. 2010. Annual Report 2010. Sabah, Malaysia.

17.
Skutsch MM. 2000. Conflict management and participation in community forestry. J Agroforestry Sys 48: 189-206. crossref(new window)

18.
Sunderlin WD. 2006. Poverty alleviation through community forestry in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam: an assessment of potential. J For Policy and Econ 8: 386-396. crossref(new window)

19.
Tomaselli MF, Timko J, Kozak R. 2012. The role of government in the development of small and medium forest enterprises: case studies from the gambia. Small-scale Fore 11: 237-253. crossref(new window)

20.
Torri MC. 2011. Conservation, relocation and the social consequences of conservation policies in protected areas: Case study of the Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. J Conseruat Soc 9: 54-64. crossref(new window)

21.
UNDP. 2008. Malaysia Sustainable Community Forest Management in Sabah. UNDP, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

22.
Warner M. 2000. Conflict Management in. Community-Based Natural Resource Projects: Experiences from Fiji and Papua New Guinea. Working Paper 135.

23.
WWoiso DA, Shemdoe RS, Kayeye H. 2009. Potential of and threats to traditional institutions for community based biodiversity management in dryland areas of Lower Moshi, Tanzania. J For Sc 25: 177-185.

24.
Zoysa MD, Inoue M. 2008. Forest governance and community based forest management in Sri Lanka: past, present and future perspectives. Inter J Soc For 1:27-29.