JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Change in Community Composition and Soil Carbon Stock Along Transitional Boundary in a Sub-Tropical Forest of Garhwal Himalaya
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Change in Community Composition and Soil Carbon Stock Along Transitional Boundary in a Sub-Tropical Forest of Garhwal Himalaya
Kumar, Munesh; Kumar, Manish; Saleem, Sajid; Prasad, Sunil; Rajwar, G.S.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of transitional boundary on community composition and soil carbon stock. Five vegetation types were recognized horizontally along the transitional strip based on the dominance of tree species i.e., Pure Anogeissus latifolia forest (P.AL), mixed Pinus roxburghii and Lannea coromandelica forest (M.PR&LC), pure Pinus roxburghii forest (P.PR), mixed Pinus roxburghii and Lannea coromandelica (M.PR&LC) and pure Anogeissus latifolia forest (P.AL). The results revealed that Anogeissus latifolia was reported dominant tree in the outer transitional boundaries of the forest, which reduced dominance of trees towards middle where Pinus roxburghii was found dominant. The soil carbon stock was reported higher in the Anogeissus latifolia dominant forest and reduced with the dominance of Pinus roxburghii in the middle site. Both the species are growing close to one another and competing for survival, but the aggressive nature of Anogeissus latifolia particular in this region may change new growth of Pinus roxburghii and will enhance soil carbon stock. But high anthropogenic pressure on Anogeissus latifolia tree species could be limited chance to further its flourish.
 Keywords
Transitional zone;Pure;mixed;competition;survival;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Curtis JT. 1959. The vegetation of Winconsin. An Ordination of plant communities, University Winconsin Press, Madision Winconsin, pp 657.

2.
Curtis JT, Cottam G. 1956. Plant ecology work book laboratory field reference manual. Burgers publication co., Minnesota, pp 193.

3.
Curtis JT, McIntosh RP. 1950. The Interrelation of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology 31: 434-455. crossref(new window)

4.
Gosz JR. 1993. Ecotone hierarchies. Ecological Applications 3: 369-376. crossref(new window)

5.
Jha MN, Gupta MK, Saxena A, Kumar R. 2003. Kumar Soil organic carbon store in different forests of India. Indian Forester 129: 714-723.

6.
Kumar Munesh, Joshi Mukesh, Todaria NP. 2010. Regeneration status and plant bio-diversity in a sub-tropical forest of Garhwal Himalaya. Journal of Forestry Research 21: 439-444. crossref(new window)

7.
Kumar M, Kumar S, Sheikh MA, Gusain MS. 2012. Community structure, species niche width and soil characteristics in a transitional zone of sub-tropical forest. Indian Forester 138: 154-158.

8.
Risser PG. 1995. The status of the science examining ecotones. Bio Science 45: 318-325.

9.
Walkley AE, Black JA. 1934. An examination of the Degtiga Vett. Method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29. crossref(new window)