JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Assessment of Seed Viability and Vigour in Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.)
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Assessment of Seed Viability and Vigour in Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.)
Kumar, Devendra;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Rapid loss in viability of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) seed is a major problem. Present effort was undertaken for developing a set pattern for assessing of viability and vigour in seed of various mother tree age of neem (Age I-06 years, Age II-15 years, Age III-25 years and Age IV->30 years old). Various viability test viz. triphenyle tetrazolium chloride test, electrical conductivity, excised embryo test, and germination test have been performed on seeds obtained from mother tree age classes. Inconsistency was observed with the TTC and EC test in germination of seed in laboratory as well as nursery. While various vigour tests viz. cold test, chemical stress test (methanol stress test), and accelerated ageing test alongwith ageing index, germination test (G%, MGT and GV) and various seedling growth parameters like seedling length (cm), number of leaves, collar diameter (cm), total biomass (g) alongwith mathematical indices i.e. vigour index, sturdiness quotient, volume index, quality index, root shoot ratio in nursery as well have been taken for study and showed better consistency. On the basis present study results of various viability and vigour test indicated that mother tree age class II performed better in comparison to others and it can be recommended for seed collection. Further it is also recommended that viability of neem seed may be assessed using various laboratory tests like excise embryo test and germination test (G%, MGT and GV) and vigour test may be taken preferably by cold germination test, chemical (methanol) stress test, accelerated ageing test in laboratory and germination alongwith various seedling growth parameters seedling length (cm), number of leaves, collar diameter (cm), total biomass (g) alongwith mathematical indices like Vigour Index, Sturdiness quotient, Volume Index, Quality index, root shoot ratio in nursery as discussed in this study.
 Keywords
germination percentage;mean germination time (MGT);germination value (GV);Azadirachta indica;vigour;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Abdul-Baki AA, Anderson JD. 1973. Vigour determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Sci 13: 630-633. crossref(new window)

2.
Agrawal PK, Dadlani M. 1992. Membrane permeability: A measure of seed quality. In: Techniques in seed science and technology (Agrawal PK, Dadlani M, eds.) South Asian Publisher New Delhi, International Book Company Absecon Highlands, NJ, pp 127-133.

3.
Bellefontaine R, Audinet M. 1993. La conservation de graines de neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.). In: Tree seed problems, with special reference to Africa (Some LM, Kam MD, eds). Barkhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 268-274.

4.
Compwell RK, Sorenson FC. 1984. Genetic implications of nursery practices, In: Forest Nursery Manual: Production of Bare root Seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers. The Hague/Boston/Lancaster, for Forest Research laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis 386, pp 183-191.

5.
Dickson A, Leaf AL, Hosner JF. 1960. Quality appraisal of white spruce and white pine seedling stock in nurseries. For Chro 36: 10-13. crossref(new window)

6.
Djavanshir K, Pourbeik H. 1976. Germination value -a new formula. Silvae Gen 25: 79-83.

7.
Ezumah BS. 1986. Germination of storage of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.). Seed Sci and Tech 14: 593-600.

8.
Gamene CS, Kraak HL, Van Pijlen JG, De Vos CHR. 1996. Storage behaviour of neem (Azadirachta indica) seeds from Burkina Faso. Seed Sci and Tech 24: 441-448.

9.
Gill NS, Delouche JC. 1973. Deterioration of seed corn during storage. Proceedings of the Association of Official Seed Analysts 63: 33-50.

10.
Heydecker W. 1972. Viability of seeds (Roberts EH, ed). Syracuse Press, Syracuse, NYUSI, pp 209-252.

11.
ISTA. 1976. International Rules for Seed testing. Rules and annexes, International Seed Testing Association. Seed Sci and Tech 4: 3-117.

12.
ISTA. 1993. International Rules for Seed Testing. Seed Sci and Tech 21.

13.
Jindal SK, Satyavir. 1994. Effect of different types of seed containers, seed versus fruit storage on germination and seedling characters in Neem. Annals of Arid Zone 10 (IV): 301-304.

14.
Kumar D, Mishra DK. 2007. Effect of fruits colour on germination, storability, and seedling performance in Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) seed. J Non Tim For Pro 14: 209-215.

15.
Kumar D, Mishra DK. 2007. Effect of methods of seed collection on seed qualities and storability of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. (Neem) seed. J Non Tim For Pro 14: 271-276.

16.
Kumar D, Mishra DK, Singh B. 2007. Effect of Temperature, media and light on germination of Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) Seeds. The Indian For 133: 1636-1642.

17.
Kumar D, Mishra DK, Singh B, Singh VP. 2008. Effect of methods of drying on viability, storability and seedling performance of Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) seeds. The Indian For 134: 991-1002.

18.
Kumar D, Mishra DK, Singh R. 2007. Effect of different methods of seed extraction on viability, storability and seedling performance of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) seeds. My For 43: 129-138.

19.
Maideen SK, Selvaraj JA, Rai RS, Vinaya. 1997. Effect of geographic source and age of mother tree on seed viability and vigour in Casuarina equisetifolia F.R. & G. Forest. Indian J of For 20: 220-222.

20.
Maithani GP, Bahuguna VK, Rawat MMS, Sood OP. 1989. Fruit maturity and interrelated effects of temperature and container or longevity of neem (Azadirachta indica) seeds. Indian Forester 115: 89-97.

21.
Masilamani P, Bhaskaran M, Chinnusamy C, Annadurai K. 2000. Influence of age of mother tree on germination and initial vigour of neem (Azadirachta indica A.Juss.). J of Tro For Sci 12: 188-190.

22.
Moore RP. 1968. Merits of different vigour test. Proceedings of the Association of Official Seed Analysts 58: 89-98.

23.
Moore RP. 1973. Tetrazolium staining for assessing seed quality. In: Seed Ecology (Heydecker W, ed). The Pennsylvania State University, London, pp 58: 89-98.

24.
Mullin RE, Svaton J. 1972. A grading: study with white spruce nursery stock. Common Wealth Forestry Review 51: 62-69.

25.
Musgrave ME, Priestly DA, Leopold AC. 1980. Methanol stress as a test of seed vigour. Crop Sci 20: 626-630. crossref(new window)

26.
Nienstaedt H. 1981. "Super" spruce seedlings continue superior growth for 18 years. US Forest Service. North Central Forest Experiment Station Research Note NC-265, pp 4.

27.
Paliwal DP, Thapar HS. 1982. Seminar- cum- workshop on Tropical Pines, Koraput, Orissa, Nov. 10-13.

28.
Powell AA, Mathews S. 1977. Deteriorative Changes in Pea Seeds (Pisum sativum L.) Stored in Humid or Dry Conditions. J Exp Bot 28: 225-234. crossref(new window)

29.
Powell AD, Dulson J, Bewley JD. 1984. Changes in germination and respiratory potential of embryos of dormant Grand Rapids lettuce seeds during long-term imbibed storage, and related changes in the endosperm. Planta 162: 40-45. crossref(new window)

30.
Powell AD, Leung DWM, Bewley JD. 1983. Long-term storage of dormant Grand Rapids lettuce seeds in the imbibed state: physiological and metabolic changes. Planta 159: 182-188. crossref(new window)

31.
Racey GD, Glerum C, Hutchison RE. 1983. The practicality of top-root ratio in nursery stock characterization. For Chro 59: 240-243. crossref(new window)

32.
Prasad R, Kandya AK. 1992. Handling of forestry seeds in India. Associated Pub Co., New Delhi, India, pp 420.

33.
Rawat MMS, Thapliyal RC. 2003. Endogenous rhythm in seed germination of Dendrocalamus strictus. Seed Sci and Tech 31: 21-27. crossref(new window)

34.
Ritchie GA. 1985. Production of bare root seedlings, In: Forestry nursery manual, (Duryea MC, Landis TD, eds.) Martinus Nijhoff Junk Publ, Netherlands, pp 243-259.

35.
Savcenko AI, Podzarova ZS. 1970. Differences in seed quality in Pine, and its importance for plantations. Lesn Hoz 5: 42-43.

36.
Sharma MM, Purohit AN. 1980. Seedling survival and seed germination under natural and laboratory conditions in Shorea robusta. Seed Sci and Tech 8: 283-287.

37.
Simon EW, Raja Harun RM. 1972. Leakage during seed imbibition. J Exp Bot 23: 1076-1085. crossref(new window)

38.
Vanangamudi K, Venkatesh A, Balaji B, Vanangamudi M, Rai RSV. 2000. Prediction of seed storability in neem (Azadirachta indica) and jamun (Syzygium cuminii) through accelerated ageing test. J of Tro For Sci 12: 270-275.

39.
Verghees Boby, Naithani SC. 1997. Physiological and biochemical changes associated with ageing in neem seed. In: IUFRO Symposium on innovation in forest tree seed science and nursery technology (Naithani SC, Varghese B, Sahu KK, eds). School of life science, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, pp 157-158.

40.
Villiers TA. 1974. Seed aging: chromosome stability and extended viability of seeds stored fully imbided. Plant Physio 53: 875-878. crossref(new window)

41.
Vlase I, Voinescu L. 1972. Intesity of fruiting and quality of the harvested seeds in Picea abies. Revista Padurilur 87: 355-356.

42.
Wang BSP, Downie B, Wetzel S, Palamarek D, Hamilton R. 1992. Effects of cone scorching on germinability and vigour of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) seeds in Alberta. Seed Sci and Tech 20: 409-419.

43.
Willan RL. 1985. A guide to Forest seed handling with special reference to the tropics. FAO Forestry Paper 20/2. FAO, Rome.