JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Developing Woody Crops for the Enhancement of Ecosystem Services under Changing Climates in the North Central United States
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Developing Woody Crops for the Enhancement of Ecosystem Services under Changing Climates in the North Central United States
Zalesny, Ronald S. Jr.; Headlee, William L.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Short rotation woody crops belonging to the genera Populus L., Salix L., Pinus L., and Eucalyptus L'Her. have provided broad economic and ecological benefits throughout the world, including afforestation and reforestation along urban to rural gradients. Within the genus Populus, cottonwoods, poplars, aspens, and their hybrids (hereafter referred to as poplars) have been shown to exhibit favorable genotype environment interactions, especially in the face of changing climates. Similar growth responses have been reported for Pinus, especially with white pine (Pinus strobus L.) in the North Central United States. This has led to current research priorities focused on ecosystem services for both genera. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) defines cultural, supporting, provisioning, and regulating ecosystem services. The overarching objective of this paper was to synthesize information about the potential of poplars to provide multiple ecosystem services when grown at sites with varying soil and climate conditions across landscape gradients from urban to rural areas. Specific objectives included: 1) providing background of the United States Forest Service and its Research and Development branch, 2) integrating knowledge of current poplar breeding and development with biomass provisioning and carbon regulating ecosystem services as they relate to changing climates in the North Central United States, and 3) providing a case study illustrating this integration through comparisons of poplar with white pine. Our results were evaluated in the context of climate change mitigation, with specific focus on selection of favorable genotypes for sequestering atmospheric carbon and reducing fossil fuel carbon emissions.
 Keywords
Biomass;Carbon Sequestration;Pinus strobus L.;Poplar;Populus;White pine;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell N, Vennetier M, Kizberger T, Rigling A, Breshears DD, Hogg EH, Gonzalez P, Fensham R, Zhang Z, Castro J, Demidova N, Lim JH, Allard G, Running SW, Semerci A, Cobb N. 2010. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For Ecol Manage 259: 660-684. crossref(new window)

2.
Banfield-Zanin JA, Leather SR. 2014. In press. Reproduction of an arboreal aphid pest, Elatobium abietinum, is altered under drought stress. J Appl Entomol DOI: 10.1111/jen.12159 crossref(new window)

3.
Bentz BJ, Regniere J, Fettig CJ, Hansen EM, Hayes JL, Hicke JA, Kelsey RG, Negron JF, Seybold SJ. 2010. Climate change and bark beetles of the western united states and canada: direct and indirect effects. BioScience 60: 602-613. crossref(new window)

4.
Boehmel C, Lewandowski I, Claupein W. 2008. Comparing annual and perennial energy cropping systems with different management intensities. Agric Systems 96: 224-236. crossref(new window)

5.
Chhin S. 2010. Influence of climate on the growth of hybrid poplar in Michigan. Forests 1: 209-229. crossref(new window)

6.
Coleman MD, Isebrands JG, Tolsted DN, Tolbert VR. 2004. Comparing soil carbon of short rotation poplar plantations with agricultural crops and woodlots in north central united states. Environ Manage 33: S299-S308.

7.
Coleman MD, Dickson RE, Isebrands JG. 2000. Contrasting fine-root production, survival and soil CO2 efflux in pine and poplar plantations. Plant Soil 225: 129-139. crossref(new window)

8.
Cook J, Beyea J. 2000. Bioenergy in the United States: progress and possibilities. Biomass Bioenergy 18: 441-455. crossref(new window)

9.
D'Amato AW, Bradford JB, Fraver S, Palik BJ. 2011. Forest management for mitigation and adaptation to climate change: insights from long-term silviculture experiments. For Ecol Manage 262: 803-816. crossref(new window)

10.
Dickmann DI. 2006. Silviculture and biology of short-rotation woody crops in temperate regions: then and now. Biomass Bioenergy 30: 696-705. crossref(new window)

11.
Dickmann DI. 2001. An overview of the genus Populus. In: Poplar Culture in North America (Dickmann DI, Isebrands JG, Eckenwalder JE, Richardson J, eds). Part A, Ch 1. NRC Res Press, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada, pp 1-42.

12.
Duveneck MJ, Scheller RM, White MA. 2014. Effects of alternative forest management strategies in the face of climate change in the northern Great Lakes region (USA). Can J For Res 44: 700-710. crossref(new window)

13.
Eckenwalder JE. 1996. Systematics and evolution of Populus. In: Biology of Populus and Its Implications for Management and Conservation (Stettler RF, Bradshaw HD Jr, Heilman PE, Hinckley TM, eds). Part I, Ch 1. NRC Res Press, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada, pp 7-32.

14.
Gopalakrishnan G, Negri MC, Wang M, Wu M, Snyder SW, LaFreniere L. 2009. Biofuels, land, and water: a systems approach to sustainability. Environ Sci Technol 43: 6094-6100. crossref(new window)

15.
Grigal DF, Berguson WE. 1998. Soil carbon changes associated with short-rotation systems. Biomass Bioenergy 14: 371-377. crossref(new window)

16.
Handler S, Duveneck MJ, Iverson L, Peters E, Scheller RM, Wythers KR, Brandt L, Butler P, Janowiak M, Shannon PD, Swanston C, Eagle AC, Cohen J, Corner R, Reich PB, Baker T, Chhin S, Clark E, Fehringer D, Fosgitt J, Gries J, Hall C, Hall KR, Heyd R, Hoving CL, Ibanez I, Kuhr D, Matthews S, Muladore J, Nadelhoffer K, Neumann D, Peters M, Prasad A, Sands M, Swaty R, Wonch L, Daley J, Davenport M, Emery MR, Johnson G, Johnson L, Neitzel D, Rissman A, Rittenhouse C, Ziel R. 2014. Michigan forest ecosystem vulnerability assessment and synthesis: a report from the northwoods climate change response framework project. NRS-GTR-129. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 229.

17.
Hansen AJ, Neilson RP, Dale VH, Flather CH, Iverson LR, Currie DJ, Shafer S, Cook R, Bartlein PJ. 2001. Global change in forests: responses of species, communities, and biomes. BioScience 51: 765-779. crossref(new window)

18.
Headlee WL, Zalesny RS Jr, Hall RB, Bauer EO, Birr BA, Randall JA, Wiese AH. 2014. Aboveground biomass production and carbon sequestration of 12 hybrid poplar genotypes harvested from 17 sites in the north-central USA. In: International Poplar Symposium VI; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; July 20-23, 2014.

19.
Headlee WL, Zalesny RS Jr, Hall RB, Bauer EO, Bender B, Birr BA, Miller RO, Randall JA, Wiese AH. 2013. Specific gravity of hybrid poplars in the north-central region, usa: within-tree variability and site $\times$ genotype effects. Forests 4: 251-269. crossref(new window)

20.
Iverson LR, Prasad AM, Matthews SN, Peters M. 2008. Estimating potential habitat for 134 eastern U.S. tree species under six climate scenarios. For Ecol Manage 254: 390-406. crossref(new window)

21.
Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA. 2003. National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For Sci 49: 12-35.

22.
Johnson JMF, Coleman MD, Gesch R, Jaradat A, Mitchell R, Reicosky D, Wilhelm WW. 2007. Biomass-bioenergy crops in the United States: a changing paradigm. Amer J Plant Sci Biotechnol 1: 1-28.

23.
Joyce DG, Rehfeldt GE. 2013. Climatic niche, ecological genetics, and impact of climate change on eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.): Guidelines for land managers. For Ecol Manage 295: 173-192. crossref(new window)

24.
King JP, Nienstaedt H. 1969. Variation in eastern white pine seed sources planted in the Lake States. Silvae Genet 18: 83-86.

25.
Kling GW, Hayhoe K, Johnson LB, Magnuson JJ, Polasky S, Robinson SK, Shuter BJ, Wander MM, Wuebbles DJ, Zak DR. 2003. Confronting climate change in the Great Lakes region: impacts on our communities and ecosystems. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Ecological Society of America, Washington, D.C, pp 92.

26.
Lamlom SH, Savidge RA. 2003. A reassessment of carbon content in wood: variation within and between 41 North American species. Biomass Bioenergy 25: 381-388. crossref(new window)

27.
Lazarus WF, Tiffany DG, Zalesny RS Jr, Riemenschneider DE. 2011. Economic impacts of short-rotation woody crops for energy or oriented strand board: a Minnesota case study. J For 109: 149-156.

28.
Magruder M, Chhin S, Monks A, O'Brien J. 2012. Effects of initial stand density and climate on red pine productivity within Huron National Forest, Michigan, USA. Forests 3: 1086-1103. crossref(new window)

29.
Mahama AA, Hall RB, Zalesny RS Jr. 2011. Differential interspecific incompatibility among Populus hybrids in sections Aigeiros Duby and Tacamahaca Spach. For Chron 87: 790-796. crossref(new window)

30.
McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA. 1990. Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71: 1232-1237. crossref(new window)

31.
McKenney DW, Pedlar JH, Lawrence KM, Campbell KL, Hutchinson MF. 2007. Potential impacts of climate change on the distribution of North American trees. BioScience 57: 939-948. crossref(new window)

32.
Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL. 2007. Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17: 2145-2151. crossref(new window)

33.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, pp 155.

34.
Nelson MD, Liknes GC, Butler BJ. 2010. Map of forest ownership in the conterminous United States. [Scale 1:7,500,000]. NRS-RM-02. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 2.

35.
Netzer DA, Tolsted D, Ostry ME, Isebrands JG, Riemenschneider DE, Ward KT. 2002. Growth, yield, and disease resistance of 7- to 12-year-old poplar clones in the north central United States. NC-GTR-229. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN, pp 31.

36.
Northern Research Station. 2008. Who owns America's forests? Forest ownership patterns and family forest highlights from the National Woodland Owner Survey. NRS-INF-06-08. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 8.

37.
Pacala S, Socolow R. 2004. Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305: 968-972. crossref(new window)

38.
Pinkard EA, Paul K, Battaglia M, Bruce J. 2014. Vulnerability of plantation carbon stocks to defoliation under current and future climates. Forests 5: 1224-1242. crossref(new window)

39.
Rajora OP, Zsuffa L. 1990. Allozyme divergence and evolutionary relationships among Populus deltoides, P. nigra, and P. maximowiczii. Genome 33: 44-49. crossref(new window)

40.
Riemenschneider DE, Berguson WE, Dickmann DI, Hall RB, Isebrands JG, Mohn CA, Stanosz GR, Tuskan GA. 2001. Poplar breeding and testing strategies in the north-central U.S.: demonstration of potential yield and consideration of future research needs. For Chron 77: 245-253. crossref(new window)

41.
Rustad L, Campbell J, Dukes JS, Huntington T, Fallon Lambert K, Mohan J, Rodenhouse N. 2012. Changing climate, changing forests: the impacts of climate change on forests of the northeastern United States and eastern Canada. NRS-GTR-99. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 48.

42.
SAS Institute, Inc., 2011. $SAS/STAT^{TM}$ User's Guide. Version 9.3. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina.

43.
Stanturf JA, van Oosten C, Netzer DA, Coleman MD, Portwood CJ. 2001. Ecology and silviculture of poplar plantations. In: Poplar Culture in North America (Dickmann DI, JG Isebrands, JE Eckenwalder, J Richardson, eds). Part A, Ch 1. NRC Res Press, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada, pp 153-206.

44.
Tuskan GA, Walsh ME. 2001. Short-rotation woody crop systems, atmospheric carbon dioxide and carbon management: a U.S. case study. For Chron 77: 259-264. crossref(new window)

45.
Tuskan GA, Difazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, Hellsten U, Putnam N, Ralph S, Rombauts S, Salamov A, Schein J, Sterck L, Aerts A, Bhalerao RR, Bhalerao RP, Blaudez D, Boerjan W, Brun A, Brunner A, Busov V, Campbell M, Carlson J, Chalot M, Chapman J, Chen GL, Cooper D, Coutinho PM, Couturier J, Covert S, Cronk Q, Cunningham R, Davis J, Degroeve S, Dejardin A, Depamphilis C, Detter J, Dirks B, Dubchak I, Duplessis S, Ehlting J, Ellis B, Gendler K, Goodstein D, Gribskov M, Grimwood J, Groover A, Gunter L, Hamberger B, Heinze B, Helariutta Y, Henrissat B, Holligan D, Holt R, Huang W, Islam-Faridi N, Jones S, Jones-Rhoades M, Jorgensen R, Joshi C, Kangasjarvi J, Karlsson J, Kelleher C, Kirkpatrick R, Kirst M, Kohler A, Kalluri U, Larimer F, Leebens-Mack J, Leple JC, Locascio P, Lou Y, Lucas S, Martin F, Montanini B, Napoli C, Nelson DR, Nelson C, Nieminen K, Nilsson O, Pereda V, Peter G, Philippe R, Pilate G, Poliakov A, Razumovskaya J, Richardson P, Rinaldi C, Ritland K, Rouze P, Ryaboy D, Schmutz J, Schrader J, Segerman B, Shin H, Siddiqui A, Sterky F, Terry A, Tsai CJ, Uberbacher E, Unneberg P, Vahala J, Wall K, Wessler S, Yang G, Yin T, Douglas C, Marra M, Sandberg G, Van de Peer Y, Rokhsar D. 2006. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313: 1596-1604. crossref(new window)

46.
United States Forest Service. 2014. 2014 Forest Service Research Overview. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, pp 20.

47.
Vance ED, Maguire DA, Zalesny RS Jr. 2010. Research strategies for increasing productivity of intensively managed forest plantations. J For 108: 183-192.

48.
Wang ZJ, Zhu JY, Zalesny RS Jr, Chen KF. 2012. Ethanol production from poplar wood through enzymatic saccharification and fermentation by dilute acid and SPORL pretreatments. Fuel 95: 606-614. crossref(new window)

49.
Wendel GW, Smith HC. 1990. Pinus strobus L. Eastern White Pine. In: Silvics of North America: Volume 1, Conifers (Burns RM, Honkala BH, eds). Agricultural Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, pp 476-488.

50.
Zalesny RS Jr, Zalesny JA. 2009. Selecting Populus with different adventitious root types for environmental benefits, fiber, and energy, pp 359-384. In: Adventitious Root Formation of Forest Trees and Horticultural Plants - From Genes to Applications (Niemi K, Scagel C, eds). Chapter 18. Research Signpost, pp 408.

51.
Zalesny RS Jr, Bauer EO. 2007. Selecting and utilizing Populus and Salix for landfill covers: implications for leachate irrigation. Int J Phytoremediation 9: 497-511. crossref(new window)

52.
Zalesny RS Jr, Headlee WL, Gopalakrishnan G, Hall RB, Hazel DW, Isebrands JG, Negri MC, Guthrie-Nichols E, et al. 2014a. Ecosystem services of poplar at long-term phytoremediation sites in the Midwest and Southeast, United States. In: International Poplar Symposium VI; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; July 20-23, 2014.

53.
Zalesny RS Jr, Headlee WL, Bauer EO, Birr BA, Hall RB, Parker B, Wiese AH. 2014b. Contrasting ecosystem services of hybrid poplar and white pine in the Upper-Midwest, USA. In: 10th Biennial Conference of the Short Rotation Woody Crops Operations Working Group, Woody Crops: Production Alternatives for Multiple Uses; Seattle, Washington, USA; July 17-19, 2014.

54.
Zalesny RS Jr, Hall RB, Zalesny JA, McMahon BG, Berguson WE, Stanosz GR. 2009. Biomass and genotype $\times$ environment interactions of Populus energy crops in the midwestern United States. BioEnergy Res 2: 106-122. crossref(new window)

55.
Zalesny RS Jr, Wiese AH, Bauer EO, Riemenschneider DE. 2006. Sapflow of hybrid poplar (Populus nigra L. $\times$ P. maximowiczii A. Henry 'NM6') during phytoremediation of landfill leachate. Biomass Bioenergy 30: 784-793. crossref(new window)