Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Valuation of Forest Habitat Functions of Endangered Mammals Using Species Distribution Model
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Valuation of Forest Habitat Functions of Endangered Mammals Using Species Distribution Model
Kim, Jung Teak; Kim, Jaeuk; Lee, Woo-Kyun; Jeon, Seong Woo; Kim, Joon Soon;
  PDF(new window)
It is estimated that there is a total of approximately 100,000 species in Korea. However, the number is currently about 30,000 and only 16,027 species are listed in the 'Species Korea' (as of December, 2014). Of the listed species, 51 species are designated as the Endangered Species Class I while 195 species are in the Class II, totaling 246 endangered species including 20 mammals. Under the circumstances that development (e.g., roads) is increasingly threatening the persistence of endangered mammals, it is significant to identify and preserve suitable habitats for them. In this context, evaluating the values of the suitable habitat environment would serve as essential information for development decision making. This study estimated the values of endangered mammals' forest habitats through spatialization of habitat services. In doing so, a species distribution model, Maximum Entropy Model (MaxEnt) was utilized for a group of endangered mammals including, mountain goat, wildcat, marten cat, and flying squirrel. To calculate the values per unit area, a benefit transfer method was used based on the point-estimate technique with the best available values estimated previously. The range of discount rate of 3.0 to 5.5 percent was applied taking the notion of social discount rate into account. As a result, the province with the highest values for endangered mammal habitats appeared to be Gangwon, followed by Gyeongbuk and Gyeongnam. The monetary values of the endangered mammal habitats were estimated to be 330 billion to 421 billion won per year.
endangered mammals;habitat;values per unit area;benefit transfer method;social discount rate;
 Cited by
Cha SM. 2001. Food habits of Eurasian Otter (Lutra lutra) in Seomjin river and Namhae area in Korea. MS Thesis. Kyungnam University, Masan, Korea. (in Korean)

Choi TY. 2002. Establishing a Korean goral (Nemorhaedus caudatus raddeanus heude) reserve in Soraksan national park, Korea: By employing habitat evaluation and minimum viable population based on trace survey using GPS. MS Thesis. Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)

Costanza R, D'Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, Van Den Belt M. 1998. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-260.

Daily GC. 1997. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 392.

Hageman RK. 1985. Valuing marine mammal populations: benefit valuations in a multi-species ecosystem. (La Jolla,) CA: National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Center.

Han SY. 2008. Measuring Economic Value for Endangered Korean Goral. Journal of Korean Forest Society 97: 525-529.

Han SY, Choi K. 1998. New approach to value outdoor recreational benefits of forest: an application of CVM-X (Experimental Contingent Valuation). Journal of Forest Recreation 2: 39-51. (in Korean with English abstract)

Han SY. 1998. The Ecological Studies of eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) in South Korea. PhD thesis. Kyungnam University, Masan, Korea. (in Korean with English abstract)

Jakobsson KM, Dragun AK. 2001. The worth of a possum: valuing species with the contingent valuation method. Environmental and Resource Economics 211-227.

Jeon SW, Kim JU, Jung HC, Lee WK, Kim JS. 2014. Species distribution modeling of endangered mammals for ecosystem services valuation - focused on national ecosystem survey data -. The Korea Society For Environmental Restoration And Revegetation Technology 17: 111-122. (in Korean with English abstract) crossref(new window)

Joo WY. 2002. Eurasian Otter (Lutra lutra) habitat suitability modeling using GIS: A case study on Soraksan National Park. MS thesis. Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)

KDI. 2008. A Study on General Guidelines for Pre-feasibility Study. 5th ed.

Kim JY, Seo CW, Kwon HS, Ryu, JE, Kim MJ. 2012. A Study on the Species Distribution Modeling using National Ecosystem Survey Data. Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment 21: 593-607. (in Korean with English abstract)

Kim SK. 2013. The effect of social discount rate manipulation on the economic feasibility tests: focusing on the environmental public investment projects. Journal of Environmental Policy 12: 71-92. (in Korean with English abstract) crossref(new window)

Kotchen MJ, Reiling SD. 2000. Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: a case study involving endangered species. Ecological Economics 32: 93-107. crossref(new window)

Kwon HS, Seo C W, Park CH. 2012. Development of species distribution models and evaluation of species richness in Jirisan region. Journal of the Korean Society for Geo-Spatial Inforamtion System 20: 11-18. (in Korean with English abstract)

Lee DK, Song WK. 2008. A Study on the Analytic Unit of habitat Suitability Assessment and Selection in Conservation Areas for Leopard Cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) - Focus on Chungchenong Province Area. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 36: 64-72. (in Korean with English abstract)

Lee HC. 2002. Valuing the nightheron resource - the dichotomous choice contingent valuation method approach. Journal of Tourism Sciences 25: 127-142. (in Korean with English abstract)

Loomis JB, Larson DM. 1994. Total economic values of increasing gray whale populations: Results from a contingent valuation survey of visitors and households. Marine Resource Economics 9: 275-286.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington DC, Island Press.

OECD. 2011. Recent OECD work on Biodiversity.

Olsen D, Richards J, Scott RD. 1991. Existence of sport values for doubling the size of Columbia River Basin Salmon and Steelhead runs. Rivers 2: 44-56.

Samples K, Hollyer J. 1990. Contingent valuation of wildlife resources in the presence of substitutes and complements. In: Economic valuation of natural resources: issues, theory, and application (Johnson R, Johnson G, eds). Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

Seo CW, Choi TY, Choi YS, Kim DY. 2008. A study on wildlife habitat suitability modeling for goral (Nemorhaedus caudatus raddeanus) in Seoraksan National Park. The Korea Society For Environmental Restoration And Revegetation Technology 11: 28-38. (in Korean with English abstract)

Son JI. 2000. Distribution and habitat Use of eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) in Dong River, Korea. MS thesis. Kyungnam University, Masan, Korea.

Stevens TH, Echeverria J, Glass RJ, Hager T, More TA. 1991. Measuring the existence value of wildlife: What do CVM estimates really show? Land Economics 67: 390-400. crossref(new window)

TEEB. 2010. The Economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations, Earthscan, London.

Tisdell, Clem, Wilson C, Nantha HS. 2005. Policies for saving a rare australian glider: economics and ecology. Biological Conservation 123: 237-248. crossref(new window)

Yang DH. 1999. Food habits of eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) in Yuncho-Dam, Koje in Korea. MS thesis. Kyungnam University, Masan, Korea.

Yeo JH, Bang SW. 2007. Analysis of professionals' willingness to pay about the Kumkang pine tree stock in Ul-Jin. Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 11: 11-23. (in Korean with English abstract)

Yeo JH, Jang WW. 2007. Estimation of biodiversity conservation value about the Heory Stock in Sun-Cheon. Journal of Korean Forest Society 96: 483-493. (in Korean with English abstract)

Yu JC, Kim JE. 2008. Using one and one-half bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation methods to estimate non-market value of otters in Cheongju, Cheongwon area. Environmental and Resource Economics Review 17: 349-379.

Youn YC, Jang HC. 1994. Evaluation on conservation value for Gwangneung woodpecker. Environmental and Resource Economics Review 3: 87-105. (in Korean with English abstract)