JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Native Customary Rights: Does It Hold the Future of Sarawak`s Natives?
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Native Customary Rights: Does It Hold the Future of Sarawak`s Natives?
Nelson, Julia; Muhammed, Nur; Rashid, Rosmalina Abdul;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This article presents an overview of the Native Customary Rights to forests and its role in protecting the future of native people of Sarawak, Malaysia. The native people have had a long history and strong relationship with their forests. Existing documents and studies have been critically reviewed and analyzed in order to elaborate the Native Customary Rights which are critical to the native people of this region. To have a better understanding on Native Customary Rights, it is important to answer three related questions: (i) Who is a native of Sarawak, (ii) What is `custom`, and (iii) What is the nature of `rights`? The roles of Native Customary Rights for economic, political or social reasons, operate through informal rules embedded in the natives` customs and traditions. These rules have never been codified into formal laws because the adat system merely functions to manage the human relations which are tied to culture thus making it difficult to codify the culture into laws. It is evident that there are several issues underlying the development of Native Customary Rights: (i) Native Customary Rights are considered as inferiority to those of the State, (ii) the issue of over-shadowing of traditional laws by the colonial rule and the current statutory laws and, (iii) projects and land schemes involving the Native Land. It is understood that the challenges of promoting Native Customary Rights are daunting task; however, the constitutional laws need to carefully revise to provide a better future for the natives.
 Keywords
indigenous people;legislation;Sarawak;traditional system;adat;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Abdullah MHR. 2006. Human rights in Malaysia: challenges and constraints in the Malaysian context. Working Paper Series No. 12. Institute of East Asian Studies. UNIMAS, Sarawak, Malaysia.

2.
Baer AS. 2012. People to People, The Peace Corps in Sarawak. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.

3.
Basnet R. 2009. Carbon ownership in community managed forests. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 8: 88-83.

4.
Bulan R. 2005. Native customary land: The trust as a device for land development in Sarawak. In: Asia-Pacific Environment Monograph 1, State, Communities and Forests in Contemporary Borneo (Cooke FM, ed). ANU E Press, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

5.
Bulan R, Locklear A. 2008. Legal perspectives on native customary land rights in Sarawak. Report produced for Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM). Alkauthar Press Sdn. Bhd, Selangor, Malaysia.

6.
Campbell JG, Thapa D. 2006. Creating community tenure: Policies and institutions for community-based management. Technical Papers on Capitalisation and Sharing of Experiences on the Interaction between Forest Policies and Land-use Patterns in Asia: Linking People with Resources 2: 91-96.

7.
Chao S. 2012. Forest peoples: numbers across the world. Report produced for Forest Peoples Programme, Stratford Road, Moreton-in-Marsh, United Kingdom.

8.
Cheah BK. 2003. The Bumiputera policy and nation-building. Kajian Malaysia XXI: 399-408.

9.
Colchester M, Wee AP, Wong MC, Jalong T. 2007. Land is Life: Land Rights and Oil Palm Development in Sarawak. Perkumpulan Sawit Watch Forest Peoples Programme, England.

10.
Cooke FM. 2005a. Recent Development and Conservation Interventions in Borneo. In: Asia-Pacific Environment Monograph 1 State, Communities and Forests in Contemporary Borneo. ANU E Press, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

11.
Cooke FM. 2005b. Expanding state spaces using 'Idle' native customary land in Sarawak. In: Asia-Pacific Environment Monograph 1 State, Communities and Forests in Contemporary Borneo. ANU E Press, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

12.
Corbera E, Estrada M, May P, Navarro G, Pacheco P. 2011. Rights to land, forests and carbon in REDD+: insights from Mexico, Brazil and Costa Rica. Forests 2: 301-342. crossref(new window)

13.
Cotula L, Mayers J. 2009. Tenure in REDD - Start-point or Afterthought? Natural Resource Issues, No. 15. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, United Kingdom.

14.
Cramb RA. 2007. Reinventing dualism: Policy narratives and modes of oil palm expansion in Sarawak. Conference of Canadian Council of Southeast Asian Studies. Laval University, Quebec City.

15.
Cramb RA, Ferraro D. 2012. Custom and capital: A financial appraisal of alternative arrangements for large-scale oil palm development on customary land in Sarawak, Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies 49: 49-69.

16.
Cramb RA, Wills IR. 1990. The role of traditional institutions in rural development: community-based land tenure and government land policy in Sarawak, Malaysia. World Development 18: 347-360. crossref(new window)

17.
Daes EIA. 2000. Human Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Indigenous Peoples and Their Relationship to Land. Final working paper, Commission on Human Rights, Sub-commission on the promotion and protection of human rights. Fifty-second session, item 7(a) of the provisional agenda, Economic and Social Council, UN.

18.
Dahal GR, Atkinson J, Bampton J. 2011. Forest tenure in Asia: status and trends. Report for EU FLEGT Facility, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

19.
De Man R. 2012. Agricultural commodities that respect land rights and food security: how to include land governance issues in sustainable commodity standards? Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty. The World Bank, Washington, DC.

20.
Department of Statistics. 2010. Total population in Sarawak, Malaysia.

21.
Donnelly GJ. Fundamentals of land ownership, land boundaries and surveying. Intergovernmental Committee on Surveying and Mapping.

22.
Egay K. 2007. Matter of access, not rights: indigenous peoples, external institutions and their squabbles in mid-Tinjar river, Sarawak. Working Paper No. 13. UNIMAS, Sarawak.

23.
Fong JC. 2011. Law on Native Customary Land in Sarawak. Thomson Reuters Malaysia Sdn Bhd, Sweet and Maxwell Asia, Selangor, Malaysia.

24.
Fox J, Fujita Y, Ngidang D, Peluso N, Potter L, Sakuntaladewi N, Sturgeon J, Thomas D. 2009. Policies, political-economy, and Swidden in Southeast Asia. Hum Ecol Interdiscip J 37: 305-322. crossref(new window)

25.
Friends of the Earth. 2007. Sarawak indigenous communities: Background situation and challenges. Briefing paper III, Submission for the European Union Delegation for Forest, Law, Governance and Trade (FLEGT), Miri, Sarawak.

26.
Griffiths T. 2008. Seeing 'REDD'? Forests, climate change mitigation and the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities. Report for Poznan (UNFCCC COP 14). Forest Peoples Programme, United Kingdom.

27.
Gyamtsho P, Singh BK, Rasul G. 2006. Capitalisation and sharing of experiences on the interaction between forest policies and land use patterns in Asia: linking people with resources. Technical Papers II. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.

28.
Haarlov-Johnsen P, Ali MO, Jemal AT, Meilinda W. 2008. Impact of land use changes on communities' livelihood strategies and environment in Kampung Empayang, Sarawak. Working Paper on Interdisciplinary Land Use and Natural Resource Management.

29.
Howard PL, Nabanoya G. 2005. Are there customary rights to plants? An inquiry among the Baganda (Uganda), with special attention to gender. World Development 35: 1542-1563.

30.
Ichikawa M. 2007. Degradation and loss of forest land and land-use changes in Sarawak, East Malaysia: A study of native land use by the Iban. Ecol Res 22: 403-413. crossref(new window)

31.
Jalong T. 2012. Indigenous Peoples and Forest Governance in Sarawak: Current Issues and Challenges. Regional Conference "Sustainable Forestry Through Good Governance". Transparency International- Malaysia.

32.
Jayasooria D. 2008. Forest based communities and their struggles for survival in modern Malaysia. Asia Views, Issue August- September.

33.
Joireman SF. 2008. The mystery of capital formation of sub- Saharan Africa: women, property rights and customary law. World Development 36: 1233-1246. crossref(new window)

34.
Kaur A. 1998. A history of forestry in Sarawak. Modern Asian Studies 32: 117-147. crossref(new window)

35.
Kershaw R. 2011. Against odds: A thirty-year struggle to save the forests of Sarawak. Asian Affairs 42: 430-446. crossref(new window)

36.
Long B, Henriques J, Andersen HS, Gausset Q, Egay K. 2003. Land tenure in relation to Crocker Range National Park. ASEAN Review of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation (ARBEC) [cited March 12, 2014].

37.
Lynch OJ. 2006. Securing community-based tenurial rights in the tropical forests of Asia: An overview of current and prospective strategies. Report from World Resources Institute's Center for International Development and Environment, Washington, DC.

38.
MacKay F. 2002. Addressing Past Wrongs - Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas: The Right to Restitution of Lands and Resources. FPP Occasional Paper October 2002 (A), UK.

39.
Mason R, Jawan JA. 2003. The Bumiputera policy and 'Dayakism': an interpretation. Kajian Malaysia 21: 177-195.

40.
Moran M, Memmott P, Long S, Stacy R, Holt J. 2002. Indigenous home ownership and community title land: A preliminary household survey. Urban policy and Research 20: 357-370. crossref(new window)

41.
Ngidang D. 2005. Deconstruction and reconstruction of native customary land tenure in Sarawak. Southeast Asian Studies 43: 47-75.

42.
Peluso NL, Vandergeest P. 2001. Genealogies of the political forest and customary rights in Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. The Journal of Asian Studies 60: 761-812. crossref(new window)

43.
Rachagan SS. 2009. Sustainable Forest Management in Malaysia - Guidelines for Conflict Resolution. Background document 5.

44.
RRI (Rights and Resources Initiative), ITTO (International Tropical Timber Organization). 2009. Tropical forest tenure assessment: trends, challenges and opportunities. Prepared for the International Conference on Forest Tenure, Governance and Enterprise: New Opportunities for Central and West Africa. Hotel Mont Febe, Yaounde, Cameroon.

45.
Rubis J. 2008. Frameworks for and implementation of FPIC over land and knowledge in Sarawak [cited March 12, 2014].

46.
Sanggin SE, Mersat NI. 2012. Indigenous people's participation in land development project in selected areas in Sarawak. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development 3: 67-80.

47.
Sarawak. 2004. Land Law of Sarawak.

48.
State Planning Unit. 2012. Sarawak facts and figures [cited March 12, 2014].

49.
State Planning Unit. www.spu.sarawak.gov.my/.

50.
Suhakam. 2011. Suhakam's national inquiry into the land rights of indigenous peoples in Malaysia. Background Paper (March): 1-16.

51.
Timberland JM. 2011. Sarawak map [retrieved March 12, 2014].

52.
Toh SM, Grace KT. 2005. Case study: Sabah forest ownership. Report produced for Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Global Forestry Services Inc, Kuala Lumpur.

53.
Vaz J. 2012. An analysis of international law, national legislation, judgments and institutions as they interrelate with territories and areas covered by indigenous peoples and local communities. Report No. 15, Malaysia. Natural Justice in Bangalore and Kalpavriksh in Pune and Delhi.

54.
www.pro-regenwald.de/docs/sarawakncrlanddisputecases.pdf (undated) Appendix 1 - Sarawak NCR Land Dispute Cases involving logging and other issues.

55.
Xanthaki A. 2003. Land rights of indigenous peoples in South-east Asia. Melbourne Journal of International Law 4: 467-496.

56.
Yong C. 2001. Community consultations in the FSC-NTCC Malaysia Collaboration-Development of FSC-Compatible Malaysian Criteria, Indicators, Activities and Standards of Performance (MC and I) for Forest Management Certification. A report for Workshop on FSC-NTCC Malaysia Collaboration- Development of FSC-Compatible Malaysian Criteria, Indicators, Activities and Standards of Performance (MC and I) for Forest Management Certification. 6-7 December 2001, Kuala Lumpur.

57.
Yong C. 2010. Forest governance in Malaysia: an NGO perspective. A report produced for FERN by JOANGO Hutan [cited March 12, 2014].