JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Analyzing the Differential Views between the Designers and the Users on Certification Assessment Criteria of the G-SEED System - Focused on Certification Assessment Criteria for Apartment Buildings -
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : KIEAE Journal
  • Volume 15, Issue 6,  2015, pp.87-92
  • Publisher : Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment
  • DOI : 10.12813/kieae.2015.15.6.087
 Title & Authors
Analyzing the Differential Views between the Designers and the Users on Certification Assessment Criteria of the G-SEED System - Focused on Certification Assessment Criteria for Apartment Buildings -
Choi, Yeo-Jin;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Purpose: The green building certification system in Korea was introduced in 2002 and developed as an improvement version of the G-SEED(Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design) system in 2013. This study conducts surveys targeting architectural designers and users on significance of certification assessment criteria for apartment buildings on the G-SEED system and examines the differential views between the two groups on assessment criteria. Method: First, The AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method was used to find importance of assessment criteria and then the importances were compared with weighted points on the certification standard. Second, the t-test was used to investigate differential views between designer and user groups on certification assessment criteria based on drawn importances. Result: (1) While designer group considered land use and transportation, energy and environmental pollution, and water circulation management as more important, user group did material and resource, maintenance management, ecological environment, and indoor environment as more important. (2) Based on t-test results, sustainable energy, water circulation system, site management, habitat, acoustical environment, and light environment were found to be different on importance between the two groups.
 Keywords
G-SEED;Certification Assessment Criteria;Apartment Buildings;Designer;User;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
녹색건축 인증제 통합운영시스템 (2015. 08. 18 접속 확인) // (G-SEED Online Total Operation System, 2015. (http://g-seed.or.kr)

2.
장현숙, 이상호, G-SEED 평가항목별 중요도 및 문제점 비교연구, 한국생태환경건축학회논문집 제14권 제1호, 2014. 2, pp. 113-120. // (Hyun-Sook Jang, Sang-Ho Lee. A Comparison Study on the Importance and Problems of Assessment Items of the G-SEED System, Journal of the Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment. Vol.14. No. 1. 2014. pp.113-120)

3.
최여진, 계층분석법을 이용한 녹색건축 인증제도 평가항목의 중요도 분석, 한국생태환경건축학회논문집 제13권 제6호, 2013. 12, pp. 113-120. // (Yeo-Jin Choi. Analyzing Weights of Certification Assessment Criteria on the G-SEED System Using the AHP Method, Journal of the Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment. Vol. 13. No. 6. 2013. pp.113-120)

4.
Yeo-Jin Choi, Sang Choon Lhee, Improvement Directions for the G-SEED System from the Resident's Perspective, KIEAE Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4. 2014. pp. 19-26. crossref(new window)

5.
Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, N.Y. McGraw-Hill, 1980.