Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Seed longevity of glyphosate resistant transgenic creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) lines
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Seed longevity of glyphosate resistant transgenic creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) lines
Hancock, Daniel; Park, Kee Woong; Mallory-Smith, Carol A.;
  PDF(new window)
Studies to estimate seed longevity and dormancy of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) were conducted from 2000 to 2005 at Corvallis and Hermiston, Oregon. Seeds from three transgenic glyphosate resistant creeping bentgrass lines, 48-10, 48-13, and ASR368, and one non-transgenic glyphosate susceptible line, SR1020, were used. Creeping bentgrass seeds were buried at 3, 18 and 31 cm in 2000 and removed 6, 12, 18, 24, and 51 months later. Soil type and climatic conditions were different at the two locations. At Corvallis, the soil was a Malabon silty clay loam, and the winters wet and mild. The soil at Hermiston was an Adkins fine sandy loam, and winters drier and colder. Seeds of all creeping bentgrass lines deteriorated faster at Corvallis than at Hermiston. The estimated half-lives of creeping bentgrass lines buried at Corvallis were 8.4 to 20.2 months, while those buried at Hermiston were 8.4 to 37.7 months. At both sites, seeds of the glyphosate resistant lines, 48-10 and 48-13, deteriorated faster than the susceptible line, SR1020. However, seed deterioration in the resistant line, ASR368, was slower than all other creeping bentgrass lines. Based on the germination test, exhumed intact seeds at Corvallis were more dormant than those at Hermiston. If buried, it could be expected that viable creeping bentgrass seeds will persist more than 4 years after the seeds are introduced to a site, but environmental conditions can influence both seed longevity and dormancy.
Agrostis stolonifera;deterioration;germination;glyphosate;GMO;seed burial;
 Cited by
Assessing weediness of herbicide tolerant genetically modified soybean,;;;;;

농업과학연구, 2016. vol.43. 4, pp.560-566 crossref(new window)
Barralis G, Chadoeuf R. 1987. Potentiel semencier des terres arables. Weed Res 27: 417-424. crossref(new window)

Barton JE, Dracup M. 2000. Genetically modified crops and the environment. Agron J 92: 797-803. crossref(new window)

Duich JM. 1985. The bent grasses. In: Weeds Trees and Turf. Harcourt Brace Javanovich Publ., NewYork, NY, pp 72-78.

Duke SO. 1998. Herbicide-resistant crops-their influence in weed science. J Weed Sci Technol 43: 94-100. crossref(new window)

James C. 1998. Global review of commercialized transgenic crops: 1998 (ISAAA Briefs No. 8). The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA), Ithaca, NY.

Mennan H. 2003. The effects of depth and duration of burial on seasonal germination, dormancy and viability of Galium aparine and Bifora radians seeds. J Agron Crop Sci 189: 304-309. crossref(new window)

Rampton H, Ching T. 1970. Persistence of crop seeds in the soil. Agron J 62: 272-277. crossref(new window)

SAS Institute Inc. 1987. SAS/STATTM Guide for personal computers. Version 6.0. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC.

Snow AA, Palma PM. 1997. Commercialization of transgenic plants: Potential ecological risks. BioScience 47: 86-96. crossref(new window)

Taylor IN, Walker SR, Adkins SW. 2005. Burial depth and cultivation influence emergence and persistence of Phalaris paradoxa seed in an Australian sub-tropical environment. Weed Res 45: 33-40. crossref(new window)

Zapiola ML, Campbell CK, Butler MD, Mallory-Smith CA. 2008. Escape and establishment of transgenic glyphosate-resistant creeping bentgrass Agrostis stolonifera in Oregon, USA: a 4-year study. J Appl Ecol 45: 486-494. crossref(new window)