JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Performance of Anaerobic Co-digester of Swine Slurry and Food Waste
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Performance of Anaerobic Co-digester of Swine Slurry and Food Waste
Yoon, Young-Man; Kim, Hyun-Cheol; Yoo, Jung-Suk; Kim, Seung-Hwan; Hong, Seung-Gil; Kim, Chang-Hyun;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In order to assess the performance of co-digester using pig slurry and food waste at the farm scale biogas production facility, the anaerobic facility that adopts the one-stage CSTR of 5 input scale was designed and installed under the conditions of the OLR of 2.33 kg and HRT of 30 days in an pig farmhouse. Several operation parameters were monitored for assessment of the process performance. The anaerobic facility was operated in three stages to compare the performance of the anaerobic co-digester. In the Stage I, that was fed with a mix of pig slurry to food waste ratio of 7:3 in the input volume, where input TS content was 4.7 () %, and OLR was 0.837-1.668 kg-VS . An average biogas yield observed was 252 with methane content 67.9%. This facility was capable of producing an electricity of 626 kWh and a heat recovery of 689 Mcal day-1. In Stage II, that was fed with a mixture of pig slurry and food waste at the ratio of 6:4 in the input volume, where input TS content was 6.9 () %, and OLR was 1.220-3.524 kg-VS . The TS content of digestate was increased to 3.0 () %. In Stage III, that was fed with only pig slurry, input TS content was 3.6 () %, and OLR was 0.182-2.187 kg-VS . In stage III, TS and volatile solid contents in the input pig slurry were highly variable, and input VFAs and alkalinity values that affect the performance of anaerobic digester were also more variable and sensitive to the variation of input organic loading during the digester operation. The biogas produced in the stage III, ranged from 11.3 to 170.0 , which was lower than 222.5-330.2 produced in the stage II.
 Keywords
Anaerobic co-digestion;Pig slurry;Food waste;Performance;Organic loading;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
전과정 평가에 의한 양돈 바이오매스의 물질 및 에너지 자원화 잠재량 연구,김승환;김창현;윤영만;

한국토양비료학회지, 2011. vol.44. 6, pp.1245-1251 crossref(new window)
2.
물질 및 에너지 수지 분석을 통한 시설채소(오이)의 청정에너지 농업 시스템 구축을 위한 기초 연구,신국식;김승환;오승용;이상은;김창현;윤영만;

한국토양비료학회지, 2012. vol.45. 2, pp.280-286 crossref(new window)
3.
The Determination of Anaerobic Biodegradability Rates Livestock Byproducts Using Double First-Order Kinetic Model,;;;;;;

한국토양비료학회지, 2015. vol.48. 5, pp.542-548 crossref(new window)
1.
Estimation of potential methane production through the mass balance equations from agricultural biomass in Korea, Applied Biological Chemistry, 2016, 59, 5, 765  crossref(new windwow)
2.
Biochemical Methane Potential of Agricultural Waste Biomass, Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 2011, 44, 5, 903  crossref(new windwow)
3.
Study for Clean Energy Farming System by Mass and Energy Balance Analysis in the Controlled Cultivation of Vegetable Crop (Cucumber), Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 2012, 45, 2, 280  crossref(new windwow)
4.
The Determination of Anaerobic Biodegradability Rates Livestock Byproducts Using Double First-Order Kinetic Model, Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 2015, 48, 5, 542  crossref(new windwow)
5.
Bioenergy and Material Production Potential by Life Cycle Assessment in Swine Waste Biomass, Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 2011, 44, 6, 1245  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Ahring, B.K. and I. Angelidaki. 2000. Methods for increasing the biogas potential from the recalcitrant organic matter contained in manure. Wat. Sci. Technol. 41(3):189-194.

2.
Angelidaki, I. and L. Ellegaard. 2003. Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 109:95-105. crossref(new window)

3.
Angelidaki, I., K. Boe, and L. Ellegaard. 2005. Effect of operation conditions and reactor configuration of efficiency of full-scale biogas plants. Wat. Sci. Technol. 52(1-2):189-194.

4.
APHA. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. American Public Health Assoc. Washington, DC.

5.
Azbar, N., P. Ursillo, and R.E. Speece. 2001. Effect of process configuration and substrate complexit on the performance of anaerobic processes. Wat. Res. 35 (3):817-829. crossref(new window)

6.
Boe, K. and I. Angelidaki. 2009. Serial CSTR digester configuration for improving biogas production from manure. Wat. Res. 43:166-172. crossref(new window)

7.
Bouallagui, H., H. Lahdheb, E.B. Romdan, B. Rachdi, and M. Hamdi. 2009. Improvement of fruit and vegetable waste anaerobic digestion performance and stability with co-substrates addition. J. Environ. Manag. 90:1844-1849. crossref(new window)

8.
Callaghan, F.J., D.A. Wase, J.K. Thayanithy, and C.F. Foster. 1999. Co-digestion of waste organic solids: batch studies. Bioresour. Technol. 67:117-122. crossref(new window)

9.
Hansen, K.H., I. Angelidaki, and B.K. Ahring. 1998. Anaerobic digestion of swine manure: inhibition by ammonia. Wat. Res. 32(1):5-12. crossref(new window)

10.
Harikishan, S. and S. Sung. 2003. Cattle waste treatment and Class A biosolid production using temperature-phased anaerobic digester. Adv. Environ. Res. 7:701-706. crossref(new window)

11.
Hartmann, H., I. Angelidaki, and B.K. Ahring. 2000. Increase of anaerobic degradation of particulate organic matter in full-scale biogas plants by mechanical maceration. Wat. Sci. Technol. 41:145-153.

12.
Hartmann, H., I. Angelidaki, and B.K. Ahring. 2000. Increase of anaerobic degradation of particulate organic matter in fullscale biogas plants by mechanical maceration. Wat. Sci. Technol. 41:145-153.

13.
Hill, D.T. and J.P. Bolte. 2000. Methane production from low solid Concentration liquid swine waste using conventional anaerobic fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 74:241-247. crossref(new window)

14.
Karakashev, D., D.J. Batstone, and I. Angelidaki. 2005. Influence of the environmental conditions on the methanogenic composition of anaerobic biogas reactors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:331-338. crossref(new window)

15.
Kramer, J. 2004. "Agricultural Biogas Casebook -2004 Update." Great Lakes Regional Biomass Energy Program, Council of Great Lakes Governors.

16.
Linke, B. 1997. A model for anaerobic digestion of animal waste slurries . Environ. Technol. 18:849-854. crossref(new window)

17.
Paavola, T., E. Syväsalo, and J. Rintala. 2006. Co-digestion of manure and biowaste according to the EC animal by-products regulation and Finnish national regulation. Wat. Sci. Technol. 53(8):223-231. crossref(new window)

18.
Poggi-Varaldo, H.M., L. Valdes, F. Esparza-Garcia, and G. Fenandez-Villagomez. 1997. Solid substrate anaerobic co-digestion of paper mill sludge, biosolids, and municipal solid waste. Wat. Sci. Technol. 35:197-204.

19.
Sorensen, A.H., M. Winther-Nielsen, and B.K. Ahring. 1991. Kinetics of lactate, acetate and propionate in unadapted and lactate-adapted thermophilic, anaerobic sewage sludge: the influence of sludge adaptation for start-up of thermophilic UASB-reactors. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 34:823-827.

20.
Speece, R.E., M. Duran, G. Demirer, H. Zhang, and T. Distefano. 1997. The role of process configuration in the performance of anaerobic systems. Wat. Sci. Technol. 36:539-547. crossref(new window)

21.
Wilkie, A.C., H.F. Castro, K.R. Cubisnki, J.M. Owens, and S.C. Yan. 2004. Fixed-film anaerobic digestion of flushed dairy manure after primary treatment: wastewater production and characterization. Biosystems. 89(4):457-471. crossref(new window)

22.
Yoon, Y.M., C.H. Kim, Y.J. Kim, and H.T. Park. $2009^a$. The economical evaluation of biogas production facility of pig waste. Kor. J. Agr. Manag. Pol. 36(1):137-157.

23.
Yoon, Y.M., Y.J. Kim, and C.H. Kim. $2009^b$. The evaluation of economical efficiency to composting and liquefying process of biomass discharged in pig breeding. Agr. Econ. 31(6):39-62.

24.
Yu, Y., C. Lee, and S. Hwang. 2005. Analysis of community structures in anaerobic processes using a quantitative realtime PCR method. Wat. Sci. Technol. 52(1-2):85-91.

25.
Zhang, Y. and C.J. Banks. 2008. Optimizing inputs and outputs from anaerobic digestion processes by co-digestion of municipal waste streams with wastes from commercial, industrial and agricultural sectors. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ISAd-sw. 24-28 May, hammamet, Tunisia.