JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Review of Soil Structure Quantification from Soil Images
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Review of Soil Structure Quantification from Soil Images
Chun, Hyen-Chung; Gimenez, Daniel; Yoon, Sung-Won; Park, Chan-Won; Moon, Yong-Hee; Sonn, Yeon-Kyu; Hyun, Byung-Keun;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Soil structure plays an important role in ecological system, since it controls transport and storage of air, gas, nutrients and solutions. The study of soil structure requires an understanding of the interrelations and interactions between the diverse soil components at various levels of organization. Investigations of the spatial distribution of pore/particle arrangements and the geometry of soil pore space can provide important information regarding ecological or crop system. Because of conveniences in image analyses and accuracy, these investigations have been thrived for a long time. Image analyses from soil sections through impregnated blocks of undisturbed soil (2 dimensional image analyses) or from 3 dimensional scanned soils by computer tomography allow quantitative assessment of the pore space. Image analysis techniques can be used to classify pore types and quantify pore structure without inaccurate or hard labor in laboratory. In this paper, the last 50 years of the soil image analyses have been presented and measurements on various soil scales were introduced, as well. In addition to history of image analyses, a couple of examples for soil image analyses were displayed. The discussion was made on the applications of image analyses and techniques to quantify pore/soil structure.
 Keywords
Soil structure;Pore geometry;Computer tomography;Image analysis;Fractal;Entropy;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Andraud, C., A. Beghdadi, and J. Lafait. 1994. Entropic analysis of random morphologies. Physica A. 207:208-212. crossref(new window)

2.
Andraud, C., A. Beghdadi, E. Haslund, J. Lafait, and B. Virgin. 1997. Local entropy characterization of correlated random microstructures. Physica A. 235:307-318. crossref(new window)

3.
Bastardie. F, Y. Capowiez, J.R. de Dreuzy, and D. Cluzeau. 2003. X-ray tomographic and hydraulic characterization of burrowing by three earthworm species in repacked soil cores. Appl. Soil Ecol. 24(1):3-16. crossref(new window)

4.
Bartoli, F., V. Genevois-Gomendy, V. Royer, S. Niquet, H. Vivier, and R. Grayson. 2005. A multiscale study of silty soil structure. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 56(2):207-223. crossref(new window)

5.
Bear, Jacob. 1974. Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Dover Publications, Inc., New York.

6.
Beghdadi, A., C. Andraud, J. Lafait, J. Peiro, and M. Perreau. 1993. Entropic and multifractal analysis of disordered morphologies. Fractals 1:671-679. crossref(new window)

7.
Bentz, D.P. and N.S. Martys. 1994. Hydraulic radius and transport in reconstructed model three-dimensional porous media. Transport Porous Med. 17:221-238. crossref(new window)

8.
Biswal, B, C. Manwart, and R. Hilfer. 1998. Three-dimensional local porosity analysis of porous media. Physica A. 255 (3-4): 221-241. crossref(new window)

9.
Boger, F., J. Feder, T. Jossang, and R. Hilfer. 1992. Microstructural sensitivity of local porosity distributions. Physica A. 187:55-70. crossref(new window)

10.
Boix-Fayos, C., A. Calvo-Cases, A.C. Imeson, and M.D. Soriano- Soto. 2001. Influence of soil properties on the aggregation of some Mediterranean soils and the use of aggregate size and stability as land degradation indicators. Catena. 44:47-67. crossref(new window)

11.
Brady, N.C. and R.R. Weil. 2000. The nature and properties of soils. 12th edition. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

12.
Capowiez, Y., P. Renault, and L. Belzunces, 2001. Three-dimensional trajectories of 60Co-labelled earthworms in artificial cores of soil. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 52:365-375. crossref(new window)

13.
Capowiez, Y., A. Pierret, and C.J. Moran. 2003. Characterisation of the three dimensional structure of earthworm burrow systems using image analysis and mathematical morphology. Biol. Fertil. Soils 38:301-310. crossref(new window)

14.
Chatzis, I. and F.A.L. Dullien, 1975. Modelling pore structure by 2-D and 3-D networks with application to sandstones, J. Can. Pet. Technol. 16(1):97-108.

15.
Chun, H.C., D. Gimenez, and S.W. Yoon. 2008. Morphology, lacunarity and entropy of intra-aggregate pores: Aggregate size and soil management effects. Geoderma. 146(1-2):83-93. crossref(new window)

16.
Cıslerova, M. and J. Votrabova. 2002. CT derived porosity distribution and flow domains. J. Hydrol. 267:186-200. crossref(new window)

17.
Crawford, J.W., R. Karl, and I.M. Young. 1993. Quantification of fungal morphology, gaseous transport and microbial dynamics in soil: an integrated framework utilizing fractal geometry. Geoderma. 56:157-172. crossref(new window)

18.
Dathe, A., S. Eins, J. Niemeyer, and G. Gerold. 2001. The surface fractal dimension of the soil-pore interface as measured by image analysis. Geoderma, 103:203-229. crossref(new window)

19.
Dexter, A.R. 1976. Internal structure of tilled soil. J. Soil Sci. 27:267-278. crossref(new window)

20.
Dexter, A.R. 1985. Shapes of aggregates from tilled layers of some dutch and Australian soils. Geoderma. 35:91-107. crossref(new window)

21.
Dexter, A.R. 1988. Advances in characterization of soil structure. Soil Till. Res. 11:199-238. crossref(new window)

22.
Dexter, A.R. and I. Hakansson. 1989. Internal micro-structure of soil clods measured by fracture surface analysis. Swed. J. Agr. Res. 19:77-83.

23.
Dexter, A.R. 2002. Soil structure: the key to soil function. pp 57-70. In: Pagliai, M. and R. Jones (eds). Sustainable Land Management-Environmental Protection, A Soil Physical Approach. IUSS.

24.
Edwards, W.M., M.J. Shipitalo, and L. D. Norton. 1988. Contribution of macroporosity to infiltration into a continuous corn notilled watershed: implications for contaminant movement. J. Contam. Hydrol. 3:193-205. crossref(new window)

25.
Edwards, W.M., M.J. Shipitalo, L.B. Owens, and L. D. Norton. 1990. Effects of lumbricus terrestris L. burrows on hydrology of continuous no-till corn fields. Geoderma. 46:73-84. crossref(new window)

26.
Fara, H.D. and A.E. Scheidegger. 1961. Statistical geometry of porous media. J. Geophys. Res. 66(10):3279-3285. crossref(new window)

27.
Fatt, I. 1956. The network model of porous media, I: Capillary pressure characterizations. Trans. AIME. 207:144.

28.
Gibson, J.R., H. Lin, and M.A. Burns. 2006. A comparison of fractal analytical methods on 2- and 3-dimensional computed tomographic scans of soil aggregates. Geoderma. 134:335-348. crossref(new window)

29.
Gimenez, D., J. Karmon, A. Posadas, and R. Shaw. 2002. Fractal dimensions of mass estimated from intact and eroded soil aggregates. Soil Till. Res. 64:165-172. crossref(new window)

30.
Gouyet, J.G. 1996. Physics and Fractal Structures. Springer, New York.

31.
Holden, N.M. 1995. Temporal variation in ped shape in an old pasture soil. Catena. 24:1-11. crossref(new window)

32.
Horgan, G.W. 1998. Mathematical morphology of analyzing soil structure from images. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 49:161-173. crossref(new window)

33.
Huisman, J.A., J.J.J.C. Snepvangers, W. Bouten, and G.B.M. Heuvelink. 2002. Mapping spatial variation in surface soil water content: comparison of ground-penetrating radar and time domain reflectometry. J. Hydrol. 269:194-207. crossref(new window)

34.
Kaluarachchi, J., V. Cvetkovic, and S. Berglund. 2000. Stochastic analysis of oxygen- and nitrate-based biodegradation of hydrocarbons in aquifers. J. Contam. Hydrol. 41:335-365. crossref(new window)

35.
Karlen, D.L. 2002. Structure, plant establishment and. pp 1269- 1275. In: Lal, R. (ed). Encyclopedia of Soil Science. Marcel Dekker, Inc.

36.
Kay, B.D. A.P. da Silva, and J.A. Baldock. 1997. Sensitivity of soil structure to changes in organic carbon content: Predictions using pedotransfer functions. Can. J. Soil Scl. 77(4):655-667. crossref(new window)

37.
Keith, C.C. and G.D. Buchan. 2002. Porosity and pore size distribution. In: Lal, R. (ed). Encyclopedia of Soil Science. Marcel Dekker, Inc.

38.
Kirchhof, G. and H. Daniel. 2003. A technique to assess smallscale heterogeneity of chemical properties in soil aggregates. Aust. J. Soil Rres. 41:919-932. crossref(new window)

39.
Kravchenko, A.N. 2008. Stochastic simulations of spatial variability based on multifractal characteristics. Vadose Zone J. 7(2): 521-524. crossref(new window)

40.
Kutilek, M. and D.R. Nielsen. 1994. Soil Hydrology: Geoecology Textbook. Cantena Verlag. Cremlinggen-Destedt, Germany.

41.
Lin, T.L. and L.W. Hourng. 2005. Determination of applicable local porosity distributions in a powder bed by the maximum entropy method. Adv. Powder Technol. 16(3):231-246. crossref(new window)

42.
Liu, H.H. and F.J. Molz. 1997. Multifractal analyses of hydraulic conductivity distributions. Water Resour. Res. 33(11):2483- 2488. crossref(new window)

43.
Luo, L.F., H. Lin, and P. Halleck. 2008. Quantifying soil structure and preferential flow in intact soil using x-ray computed tomography. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 72(4):1058-1069. crossref(new window)

44.
Masad, E. and B. Muhunthan. 1997. Three-dimensional characterization and simulation of anisotropic soil fabric. J. Geotech. And Geoenvir. Engrg. 126(3):199-207.

45.
McBratney, A.B., C.J. Moran, J.B. Stewart, S.R. Cattle, and A.J. Koppi. 1992. Modifications to a method of rapid assessment of soil macropore structure by image analysis. Geoderma. 53: 255-274. crossref(new window)

46.
Monga, O., M. Bousso, P. Garnier, and V. Pot. 2008. 3D geometric structures and biological activity: Application to microbial soil organic matter decomposition in pore space. Ecol. Model. 216(3-4):291-302. crossref(new window)

47.
Moran, C.J. and A.B. McBratney. 1992. Acquisition and analysis of three component digital images of soil pore structure. I. Method. J. Soil Sci. 43:541-549. crossref(new window)

48.
Nunan, N., K. Ritz, M. Rivers, D.S. Feeney, and I.M. Young. 2006. Investigating microbial micro-habitat structure using X-ray computed tomography, Geoderma. 133:398-407. crossref(new window)

49.
Oleschko, K., F. Brambila, F. Aceff, and L.P. Mora. 1997. From fractal analysis along a line to fractals on the plane. Soil Till. Res. 45:389-406.

50.
Oleschko, K., G. Korvin, A.S. Balankin, R.V. Khachaturov, L. Flores, B. Figueroa, J. Urrutia, and F. Brambila. 2002. Fractal Scattering of Microwaves from Soils. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(18): 188501 1-4. crossref(new window)

51.
Olson, R., H. Nariya, K. Yokota, Y. Kamio, and E. Gouaux, 1999. Crystal structure of Staphylococcal LukF delineates conformational changes accompanying formation of a transmembrane channel, Nature Struct. Biol. 6:134-140. crossref(new window)

52.
Perfect, E. and B.D. Kay. 1995. Applications of fractals in soil and tillage research: A review. Soil Till. Res. 32(102):1-20.

53.
Perret, J.S., S.O. Prasher, and A.R. Kacimov. 2003. Mass fractal dimension of soil macropores using computed tomography: from the box-counting to the cube-counting algorithm. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 53(3):569-579.

54.
Peth, S., R. Horn, F. Beckmann, T. Donath, J. Fischer, A.J.M. Smucker. 2008. Three-dimensional quantification of intra-aggregate pore-space features using synchrotron-radiation-based microtomography. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 72(4):897-907. crossref(new window)

55.
Pierret, J., S.O. Prasher, A. Kantzas, and C. Langford. 1999. Threedomensional quantification of macropore networks in undisturbed soil cores. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63:1530-1543. crossref(new window)

56.
Pierret A, C.J. Moran, and C. Doussan. 2005. Conventional detection methodology is limiting our ability to understand the roles and functions of fine roots. New Phytol 166:967-980. crossref(new window)

57.
Pohlmann, K., A. Hassan, and J. Chapman. 2000. Description of hydrogeologic heterogeneity and evaluation of radionuclide transport at an underground nuclear test. J. Contam. Hydrol. 44:353-386. crossref(new window)

58.
Posadas, A.N.D., D. Gimenez, M. Bittelli, C.M.P. Vaz, and M. Flury. 2003. Multifractal characterization of soil particle-size distributions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65(5):1361-1367.

59.
Pozdnyakova, L, D. Gimenez, and P.V. Oudemans. 2005. Spatial analysis of cranberry yield at three scales. Agron. J. 97(1):49-57. crossref(new window)

60.
Rachman, A., S. H. Anderson, and C. J. Gantzer. 2005. Computedtomographic measurement of soil macroporosity parameters as affected by stiff-stemmed grass hedges. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69(5):1609-1616. crossref(new window)

61.
Ringrose-Voase, A.J. and C. Nys. 1990. One-dimensional image analysis of soil structure. II. Interpretation of parameters with respect to four forest soil profiles. J. Soil Sci. 41:513-527. crossref(new window)

62.
Russell, M.B. 1941. Pore-size distribution as a measure of soil structure. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 6:108-112.

63.
Serra, J. 1988. Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. Vol. 1. Academic press.

64.
Shannon, C.E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell. Syst. Tech. J. 27:379-656. crossref(new window)

65.
Smetten, K.R.J. and N. Collis-George. 1985. Statistical characterization of soil biopores using a soil peel method. Geoderma 36:27-36. crossref(new window)

66.
Splajt, T., G. Ferrier, and L.E. Frostick. 2003. Application of ground penetrating radar in mapping and monitoring landfill sites. Environ. Geol. 44:963-967. crossref(new window)

67.
Taina, I.A., R.J. Heck, and T.R. Elliot. 2008. Application of X-ray computed tomography to soil science: A literature review. Can. J. Soil Sci. 88(1):1-20. crossref(new window)

68.
Talukdar, M.S., O. Torsaeter, M.A. Ioannidis, and J.J. Howard. 2002. Stochastic reconstruction, 3D characterization and network modeling of chalk. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 35(1-2):1-21. crossref(new window)

69.
Tarquis, A.M., K.J. McInnes, J.R. Keys, A. Saa, M.R. Garcia, and M.C. Diaz. 2006. Multiscaling analysis in a structured clay soil using 2D images, J. Hydrol. 322:236-246. crossref(new window)

70.
Tennekoon, L., M.C. Boufadel, D. Lavallee, and J. Weaver. 2003. Multifractal anisotropic scaling of the hydraulic conductivity. Water Resour. Res. 39(7):1193.

71.
Treseder, K.K. and M.F. Allen. 2000. Mycorrhizal fungi have a potential role in soil carbon storage under elevated $CO_{2}$ and nitrogen deposition. New Phytol. 147:189-200. crossref(new window)

72.
VandenBygaart, A.J. and R. Protz. 1999. The representative elementary area REA in studies of quantitative soil micromorphology. Geoderma. 89:333-346. crossref(new window)

73.
Wittmus, H.D. and A.P. Mazurak. 1958. Chemical and physical properties of soil aggregates in a Brunizem soil. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 22:1-5. crossref(new window)

74.
Wong, R.C.K. and R. Wibowo. 2000. Tomographic evaluation of air and water flow patterns in soil column. Geotech. Test. J. 23(4):413-422. crossref(new window)

75.
Yelshin, A. 1996. On the possibility of using information entropy as a quantitative description of porous media structural characteristics. J. Membrane Sci. 117:279-289. crossref(new window)

76.
Young, I.M. and J.W. Crawford. 1992. The analysis of fracture profiles of soil using fractal geometry. Aust. J. Soil Res. 30: 291-295. crossref(new window)

77.
Young, I.M., J.W. Crawford, and C. Rappoldt. 2001. New methods and models for characterizing structural heterogeneity of soil. Soil Till. Res. 61:33-45. crossref(new window)