JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
LCA on Lettuce Cropping System by Top-down Method in Protected Cultivation
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
LCA on Lettuce Cropping System by Top-down Method in Protected Cultivation
Ryu, Jong-Hee; Kim, Kye-Hoon; So, Kyu-Ho; Lee, Gil-Zae; Kim, Gun-Yeob; Lee, Deog-Bae;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study was carried out to estimate carbon emission using LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) and to establish LCI (Life Cycle inventory) DB for lettuce production system in protected cultivation. The results of data collection for establishing LCI DB showed that the amount of fertilizer input for 1 kg lettuce production was the highest. The amounts of organic and chemical fertilizer input for 1 kg lettuce production were 7.85E-01 kg and 4.42E-02 kg, respectively. Both inputs of fertilizer and energy accounted for the largest share. The amount of field emission for , and for 1 kg lettuce production was 3.23E-02 kg. The result of LCI analysis focused on GHG (Greenhouse gas) showed that the emission value to produce 1 kg of lettuce was 8.65E-01 kg . The emission values of and to produce 1 kg of lettuce were 8.59E-03 kg and 2.90E-04 kg , respectively. Fertilizer production process contributed most to GHG emission. Whereas, the amount of emitted nitrous oxide was the most during lettuce cropping stage due to nitrogen fertilization. When GHG was calculated in -equivalents, the carbon footprint from GHG was 1.14E-+00 kg -eq. . Here, accounted for 76% of the total GHG emissions from lettuce production system. Methane and nitrous oxide held 16%, 8% of it, respectively. The results of LCIA (Life Cycle Impact assessment) showed that GWP (Global Warming Potential) and POCP (Photochemical Ozon Creation Potential) were 1.14E+00 kg -eq. and 9.45E-05 kg -eq. , respectively. Fertilizer production is the greatest contributor to the environmental impact, followed by energy production and agricultural material production.
 Keywords
LCA;Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.);Protected cultivation;Carbon footprint;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
관행농 쌀 생산체계의 탄소배출량 평가를 위한 전과정평가: top-down 방식의 국가평균값과 bottom-up 방식의 사례분석값 비교,유종희;정순철;김건엽;이종식;김계훈;

한국토양비료학회지, 2012. vol.45. 6, pp.1143-1152 crossref(new window)
2.
쌀 생산체계에 대한 영농방법별 전과정평가: 관행농, 무농약, 유기농법별 탄소배출량 비교,유종희;권영립;김건엽;이종식;김계훈;소규호;

한국토양비료학회지, 2012. vol.45. 6, pp.1157-1163 crossref(new window)
3.
A Case Study to Estimate the Greenhouse-Gas Mitigation Potential on Conventional Rice Production System,;;;;;

한국토양비료학회지, 2013. vol.46. 6, pp.502-509 crossref(new window)
4.
A Case Study to Estimate the Greenhouse-Gas Mitigation Potential on Rice Production System in Farming without Agricultural Chemicals,;;;;;

한국토양비료학회지, 2014. vol.47. 5, pp.374-380 crossref(new window)
1.
Life Cylcle Assessment (LCA) on Rice Production Systems: Comparison of Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) Emission on Conventional, Without Agricultural Chemical and Organic Farming, Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 2012, 45, 6, 1157  crossref(new windwow)
2.
A Case Study to Estimate the Greenhouse-Gas Mitigation Potential on Conventional Rice Production System, Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 2013, 46, 6, 502  crossref(new windwow)
3.
LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) for Evaluating Carbon Emission from Conventional Rice Cultivation System: Comparison of Top-down and Bottom-up Methodology, Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 2012, 45, 6, 1143  crossref(new windwow)
4.
A Case Study to Estimate the Greenhouse-Gas Mitigation Potential on Rice Production System in Farming without Agricultural Chemicals, Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 2014, 47, 5, 374  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Amlinger, F., S. Peyr, and C. Cuhls. 2008. Greenhouse gas emission from composting and mechnical biological treatment. Waste Manage. Res. 26(1):47-60. crossref(new window)

2.
Cho, K.H. and Y. Paek. 2007. Heat recovery effect using vegetable sludge of bio-thermal energy in closed chamber. J. Kor. Soc. Mechanical Technology 9(2):39-42.

3.
Choi, S.H., Y.T. Oh, and J. D. So. 2006. Characteristics of exhaust emission by the application of biodiesel fuel and oxygenates as an alternative fuel in an agricultural diesel engine. J. Biosystem Eng. 31(6):457-462. crossref(new window)

4.
Dalgaard, R., N. Halberg, I.S. Kristensen, and I. Larsen. 2003. Proceeding from the 4th International Conference, Bygholm, Denmark, An LC Inventory based on representative and coherent farm types.

5.
Diaz, L.F and G.M. Savage. 2007. Factors that affect the process, In: Diaz, L et al. (eds) Compost science and technology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 49-66.

6.
Erwin, M.S. and M.F. Annik. 2008. LCA studies of food products as background for environmental product declarations, Int. J. Life Cycle Ass. 13(3):255-264. crossref(new window)

7.
Frischknecht, R. and G. Rebitzer. 2005. The ecoinvent database system: a comprehensive web-based LCA database. J. Clean. Prod. 13(2005):1337-1343. crossref(new window)

8.
Haas, G., F. Wetterich, and U. Köpke. 2001. Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agri. Ecosyst. Environ. 83:43-53. crossref(new window)

9.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 1996. IPCC Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories.

10.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Pannel on Climate Change). 2001. Climate change 2001, Radioactive forcing of climate change, The scientific basis. Cambridge University press, UK. pp. 388-390.

11.
Iserman, K. 1994. Agriculture's share in the emissions of trace gases affecting the climate and some cause oriented proposal for reducing this share, Environ. Pollut. 83:95-11. crossref(new window)

12.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization), 1997. Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Principles and framework. International Standard ISO 14040, ISO, Geneva.

13.
Jensen, A.A., L. Hoffman, B.T. Moller, A. Schmidt, K. Christiansen, J. Eikington, and F. van Dijk, 1997. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) - A guide to approaches, experiences and information sources; European Environmental Agency.

14.
KCPA (Korea Crop Protection Association). 2007a. Agrochemical use guide book. Korea Crop Protection Association. Seoul, Korea.

15.
KCPA (Korea Crop Protection Association). 2007b. Agrochemical year book. Korea Crop Protection Association. Seoul, Korea.

16.
KEITI (Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute). 2010. Certificated Products List of Carbon Footprint. http://www.edp.or.kr/carbon/data/

17.
KFIA (Korea Fertilizer Industry Association). 2007. fertilizer production data. Korea Fertilizer Industry Association. Seoul, Korea. available http://www.fert-kfia.or.kr

18.
KWA (Korea Waste Association). 2007. Agricultural waste data. Korea Waste Association. Seoul, Korea. available from http://www.kwaste.or.kr/data/

19.
Lee, Y.B., H.B. Yun, Y. Lee., and D. Kaown. 2009. Evaluation of ammonia emission from arable soil applied liquid manure and compost. 2009 International Symposium for Improvement of Agro-Food Safety. pp. 329-338.

20.
Lim, S.S., H.J. Park, S.I. Lee. D.S. Lee, J.H Kwak, and W.J. Choi. 2009. The role of organic amendments with different biodegradability in Ammonia volatilization during composting of cattle manure. Korean J. of Environ. Agric. 28(1):20-24. crossref(new window)

21.
ME (Ministry of Environment). Guidelines for draw up on Carbon Footprint Label. Public announcement of Ministry of Environment 2009-86.

22.
MFAFF (Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheres). 2004. A study on establishing effective management system for equipped agricultural input wastes. C2004-A1. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheres. Seoul, Korea.

23.
MKE (Ministry of Knowledge Economy). Software program PASS v4.1.

24.
RDA (Rural Development Administration). 2008. 2007 Agro-livestock incomes data book. Rural Development Administration. Suwon, Korea.

25.
Roh, K.A., D.B. Lee, G.Y. Kim, K.M. Shim, H.C. Jeong, and B.G. Ko. 2008. Estimation of GHG emission from agricultural area and development of national inventories in Korea. International Symposium on measures to climate change in agricultural sector. pp. 124-134.

26.
Seo, B.K. and S.K. Song. 2010. State-of-the-art of life cycle assessment for biodiesel Production from plant biomass. KSBB Journal 25:1-10.

27.
Simapro software v7.2, ecoinvent process system.

28.
Suan, E.P. 2005. Quantifying cradle-to-farm gate life-cycle impacts associated with fertilizer used for corn, soybean, and stover production, national renewable energy laboratory, Technical Report.

29.
Williams, A.G., E. Audsley, and D.L. Sandars. 2006. Determining the environmental burdens and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities. Main Report. Defra Research Project IS0 205. Bedford: Cranfield University and Defra.