JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Rice Yield Response to Biochar Application Under Different Water Managements Practices
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Rice Yield Response to Biochar Application Under Different Water Managements Practices
Jung, Won-Kyo;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Increasing rice grain yield is critical for feeding rapid increasing of Asian population. However, global warming effect may be negative for sustainable rice production. Therefore it is essential to develop technologies not only for increasing grain yield but also for reducing global warming effect. Biochar, which is carbonized biomass, has a great potential of carbon sequestration and soil quality improvement, which can contribute grain yield increasing. In this study, rice yield responses to biochar application on the rice cropping system were evaluated with field experiments under different water management practices at the research farm of the University of Missouri-Columbia Delta Research Center, Portageville, MO. Biochar (i.e., ) was produced using field scale pyrolyzer and incorporated into the field 4 months prior to planting. Rice was grown under three different water management practices. Result showed that no significant yield difference was found in the biochar application plots compared to rice hull and control plots from the 2 years field study at the very fertile soil. However, rainfed management results in severe reduction of yield. Research concludes that the biochar application does not significantly influence on rice yield increasing especially for very fertile soils.
 Keywords
Rice yield;Climate change;Biochar;Water management;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Quantifying the effect of biochar amendment on soil quality and crop productivity in Chinese rice paddies, Field Crops Research, 2013, 154, 172  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Asai, H., B.K. Samson, H.K. Stephan, K. Songyikhangsuthor, K. Homma, Y. Kiyono, Y. Inoue, T. Shiraiwa, and T. Horie. 2009. Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Research 111:81-84. crossref(new window)

2.
Baldock, J., and R. Smernik. 2002. Chemical composition and bioavailability of thermally altered Pinus resinosa (Red pine) wood. Organic Geochemistry 33:1093-1109. crossref(new window)

3.
Cayuela. M., P. Kuikman, O. Oenema, R. Bakker, and J. Van Groenigen. 2009. Bioenergy residues applied as soil amendments: $N_2O$ emissions and C sequestration potential. pp. 304.

4.
Chan, K., L. Van Zwieten, I. Meszaros, A. Downie, and S. Joseph. 2007. Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45:629-634. crossref(new window)

5.
Del Grosso, S., W. Parton, T. Stohlgren, D. Zheng, D. Bachelet, S. Prince, K. Hibbard, and R. Olson. 2008. Global potential net primary production predicted from vegetation class, precipitation, and temperature. Ecology 89:2117-2126. crossref(new window)

6.
Garrett, J.D., F.P. Allgood, B.L. Brown, R.B Grossman, and C.L. Scrivner. 1978. Soils of the southeast Missouri Lowlands. C922, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO.

7.
Gero, P. Jonathan, and David D. Turner, 2011. Long-Term Trends in Downwelling Spectral Infrared Radiance over the U.S. Southern Great Plains. J. Climate 24:4831-4843. crossref(new window)

8.
Haefele, S.M, C. Knoblauch, M. Gummert, Y. Konboon, and S. Koyama. 2008. Black carbon (biochar) in rice-based systems: Characteristics and opportunities. In: Woods, W.I., Teixeira, W.G., Lehmann, J., Steiner, C., Prins, A.W. and L. Rebellatods. (Eds.). Amazon dark earths: Wim Soembrok's vision. pp. 445-463. Amsterdam: Springer.

9.
Hansen, J., M. Sato, P. Kharecha, D. Beerling, R. Berner, V. Masson-Delmotte, M. Pagani, M. Raymo, D. Royer, and J. Zachos. 2008. Target atmospheric $CO_2$: Where should humanity aim? Open Atmospheric Science Journal 2:217-231. crossref(new window)

10.
Hillier, J., C. Hawes, G. Squire, A. Hilton, S. Wale, and P. Smith. 2009. The carbon footprints of food crop production. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 7:107-118. crossref(new window)

11.
Ji-lu, Z. 2007. Bio-oil from fast pyrolysis of rice husk: Yields and related properties and improvement of the pyrolysis system. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 80:30-35. crossref(new window)

12.
Jung, 2011. Characterization of Crop Residue-Derived Biochars Produced by Field Scale Biomass Pyrolyzer. Korean J. Soil Sc. Fert. 44:1-7. crossref(new window)

13.
Kuzyakov, Y., I. Subbotina, H. Chen, I. Bogomolova, and X. Xu. 2009. Black carbon decomposition and incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by 14C labeling. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41:210-219. crossref(new window)

14.
Laird, D. 2008. The charcoal vision: A win win win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestering carbon, while improving soil and water quality. Agronomy Journal 100:178. crossref(new window)

15.
Lal, R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623. crossref(new window)

16.
Lehmann, J. 2007. A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143-144. crossref(new window)

17.
Lehmann, J. 2009. Biological carbon sequestration must and can be a win-win approach. Climatic Change 97:459-463. crossref(new window)

18.
Mathews, J. 2008. Carbon-negative biofuels. Energy Policy 36:940-945. crossref(new window)

19.
Oasmaa, A., D. Elliott, and S. Müller. 2009. Quality control in fast pyrolysis bio-oil production and use. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 28:404-409. crossref(new window)

20.
Peng, S., J. Huang, J. Sheehy, R. Laza, R. Visperas, X. Zhong, G. Centeno, G. Khush, and K. Cassman. 2004. Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101:9971. crossref(new window)

21.
Prasad, P., K. Boote, and L. Allen. 2006. Species, ecotype and cultivar differences in spikelet fertility and harvest index of rice in response to high temperature stress. Field crops research 95:398-411. crossref(new window)

22.
Reichenauer, T.G, S. Panamulla, S. Subasinghe, and B. Wimmer. 2009. Soil amendments and cultivar selection canimprove rice yield in salt-influenced (tsunami-affected) paddy fields in Sri Lanka. Environ. Geochem. Health, 31:573-579. crossref(new window)

23.
Searchinger, T., R. Heimlich, R. Houghton, F. Dong, A. Elobeid, J. Fabiosa, S. Tokgoz, D. Hayes, and T. Yu. 2008. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238. crossref(new window)

24.
Smith, P., D. Martino, Z. Cai, D. Gwary, H. Janzen, P. Kumar, B. McCarl, S. Ogle, F. O'Mara, and C. Rice. 2008. Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363:789. crossref(new window)

25.
Tagoe, S.O., Takatsugu Horiuchi, T., and T. Matsui. 2008. Effects of carbonized and dried chicken manures on the growth, yield, and N content of soybean. Plant Soil 306:211-220. crossref(new window)

26.
Wang, G., S. Chhin, and W. Bauerle. 2006. Effect of natural atmospheric $CO_2$ fertilization suggested by open-grown white spruce in a dry environment. Global Change Biology 12:601-610. crossref(new window)