JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Use of Two Dimensional Electrical Resistivity Tomography to Identify Soil Water Dynamics and the Effective Plant Root Zone
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Use of Two Dimensional Electrical Resistivity Tomography to Identify Soil Water Dynamics and the Effective Plant Root Zone
Yoon, Sung-Won; Zhang, Yong-Seon; Han, Kyung-Hwa; Jo, Hee-Rae; Ha, Sang-Keun; Park, Sam-Kyeu; Sonn, Yeon-Kyu;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The identification of effective root zone would clarify dynamics of plant available water and soil water balance. Using the relationship between soil properties and electrical resistivity (ER) the purpose of this research is to identify soil zone affected by a plant root activity using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) technique. Four plastic containers were prepared for two different soil textures (clay and sandy loam) and one container for each texture was selected for planting four corn seedlings (Zea mays L.) and the others were prepared for the blank. For ERT monitoring, we prepared 0.8 m plastic sticks with 17 electrodes installed with 5 cm space. The Ministing (AGI Inc., Texas) instrument for electrical resistivity measurement and semi-auto converter of electrode arrangement were set up for dipole-dipole array. During 2 months of the corns growing, ERT monitoring was made 3 to 4 days after the irrigation practice. Despite of the same amount water supplied into soils, two textures showed very different apparent resistivity values due to different clay content. The apparent electrical resistivity is consistently lower in clay loam comparing to sandy loam soil implying that plant root does not significantly alter the overall trend of resistivity. When plant root system, however, is active both soils with plants showed 2-7 times higher electrical resistivity and higher coefficient variation than soils without plant, implying the effect of root system on the resistivity, in which may caused by. This result suggests plant root activities regulating the soil water dynamics mainly control the variation of electrical resistivity over soil textural difference. Therefore the identification of water uptake zone would highly be correlated to plant root activities, thus ERT will be feasible approach to identify spatial characteristics of a plant root activity.
 Keywords
Effective root zone;Electrical resistivity tomography;Root water uptake;Spatial distribution;Soil water;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Basso, B., M. Amato, L. Sartori, G. Bitella, and R. Rossi. 2009. Subsurface imaging of tillage systems effects on soil physical properties using electrical resistivity tomography. Geophys. Res., Abstracts 11, EGU2009-0.

2.
Bernard-Ubertosi, M., P. Dudoignon, and Y. Pons. 2009. Characterization of structural profiles in clay-rich marsh soils by cone resistance and resistivity measurements. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73 : 46-54 crossref(new window)

3.
Brunet, P., R. Clement, and C. Bouvier. 2010. Monitoring soil water content and deficit using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) - a case study in the Cevennes area, France. J. Hydrol. 380, 146-153. crossref(new window)

4.
Federer, C.A., C. Vorosmarty, and B. Fekete. 2003. Sensitivity of annual evaporation to soil and root properties in two models of contrasting complexity. J. Hydrometeor. 4(6): 1276-1290. crossref(new window)

5.
Fukue, M., T. Minato, H. Horibe, and N. Taya. 1999. The microstructures of clay given by resistivity measurements. Eng. Geology. 564: 43-54

6.
Hadzick, Z.Z., A.K. Guber, Y.A. Pachepsky, and R.L. Hill. 2011. Pedotransfer functions in soil electrical resistivity estimation. Geoderma 194:195-202.

7.
Jayawickreme, D.H., R.L. Van Dam, and D.W. Hyndman. 2008. Subsurface imaging of vegetation, climate, and root-zone moisture interactions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L18404. doi:10.1029/2008GL034690. crossref(new window)

8.
Jayawickreme, D.H., R.L. Van Dam, and D.W. Hyndman. 2010. Hydrological consequences of land-cover change: quantifying the influence of plants on soil moisture with time-lapse electrical resistivity. Geophysics 75, WA43-WA50. crossref(new window)

9.
Kim, J.H., M.J. Yi, Y. Song, and S.H. Chung. 2001. A Comparison of electrode arrays in two-dimensional resistivity survey. J. Korea Soc. Geosyst. Eng. 38(2):116-128

10.
Lamotte, M., A. Bruand, M. Dabas, P. Donfack, G. Gabalda, A. Hesse, F.-X. Humbel, and H. Robain. 1994. Distribution d'un horizon a' forte cohe'sion au sein d'une couverture de sol aride du Nord-Cameroun: apport d'une prospection e'lectrique. Comptes rendus a' l'academie des sciences. Earth Planet. Sci. 318, 961-968.

11.
Samouelian, A., I. Cousin, G. Richard, A. Tabbagh, A. Bruand, and G. Richard. 2005. Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review. Soil Till. Res.. 83, 173-193. crossref(new window)

12.
Schwartz, B.F., M.E. Schreiber, and T.T. Yan. 2008. Quantifying field-scale soil moisture using electrical resistivity imaging. J. Hydrol. 362:234-246 crossref(new window)

13.
Turesson, A. 2006. Water content and porosity estimated from ground-penetrating radar and resistivity. J. Appl. Geophy. 58, 99-111. crossref(new window)

14.
Yoon, SW, S. Park, H.J. Chun, K.H. Han, S.S. Kang, M.S. Kim, and Y.H. Kim. 2011. Application of electrical resistivity measurement to an evaluation of saline soil in cropping field. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 44(6) :1035-1041. crossref(new window)