JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Substrate to Inoculum Ratio on Biochemical Methane Potential in the Thermal Pretreatment of Piggery Sludge
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Substrate to Inoculum Ratio on Biochemical Methane Potential in the Thermal Pretreatment of Piggery Sludge
Kim, Seung-Hwan; Kim, Ho; Oh, Seong-Yong; Kim, Chang-Hyun; Yoon, Young-Man;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study was carried out to investigate the effect of substrate to inoculum ratio on ultimate methane potential () from piggery wastes. BMP(Biochemical methane potential) assays were executed for the three samples that have different organic characteristics (Filtrate of pig slurry, LF; Thermal hydrolysate of piggery sludge cake, TH; Mixture of LF and TH at the ratio of 4 to 1, Mix), and values obtained from BMP assays were compared with the theoretical methane potential () of each samples. While values (0.27, 0.44, and ) of TH sample that was pretreated with thermal hydrolysis were below the at all S/I ratios (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5), and values of LF (0.64 and for the S/I ratios of 0.1 and 0.3, respectively) at the lower S/I ratios of 0.1 and 0.3 exceeded the values (). And also biodegradability () of LF sample were obtained as 152.07%, 122.67%, and 95.71% at the S/I ratios of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5, respectively, and unreasonable values were presented at lower S/I ratios of 0.1 and 0.3. and of Mix sample showed a similar tendency with those of LF sample. Therefore, TH sample by thermal hydrolysis pretreatment showed lower anaerobic biodegradability than those of other samples (LF and Mix) and ultimate methane potentials of LF and Mix samples were overestimated in the lower S/I ratio of 0.1 and 0.3.
 Keywords
Biochemical methane potential;S/I ratio;Pig slurry;Anaerobic digestion;Biogas;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
Effects of Organic Content on Anaerobic Biodegradability of Sludge Generating from Slaughterhouse,;;;;;

한국토양비료학회지, 2013. vol.46. 4, pp.296-302 crossref(new window)
2.
도시 하수 및 공장 폐수 슬러지의 바이오가스화에 관한 연구,김자현;김석구;황인주;안재환;강성원;이원태;임준혁;이제근;이태윤;

한국지반환경공학회 논문집, 2014. vol.15. 9, pp.5-12 crossref(new window)
3.
Effect of Organic Content on Anaerobic Biodegradability by Agricultural Waste Biomass,;;;

한국토양비료학회지, 2014. vol.47. 3, pp.155-164 crossref(new window)
1.
Effects of Organic Content on Anaerobic Biodegradability of Sludge Generating from Slaughterhouse, Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 2013, 46, 4, 296  crossref(new windwow)
2.
Effect of Organic Content on Anaerobic Biodegradability by Agricultural Waste Biomass, Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 2014, 47, 3, 155  crossref(new windwow)
3.
Effects of Substrate to Inoculum Ratio on Biochemical Methane Potential in Thermal Hydrolysate of Poultry Slaughterhouse Sludge, Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 2016, 35, 2, 121  crossref(new windwow)
4.
A Study on the Biogasification of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater Sludge, Journal of the Korean Geoenvironmental Society, 2014, 15, 9, 5  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Angelidaki, I and W. Sanders. 2004. Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of acropollutants. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 3(2):117. crossref(new window)

2.
Angelidaki, I, and B.K. Ahring. 1992. Effects of free long-chain fatty acids on thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 37:808-812.

3.
APHA (American Public Health Association). 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th ed.

4.
Beuvink, J.M., S.F. Spoelstra, and R.J. Hogendrop. 1992. An automated method ofr measuring the time course of gas production of feedstuffs incubated with buffered rumen fluid. Neth. J. Agri. Sci. 40:401-407.

5.
Bougrier, C., J.P. Delgenes, and H. Carrere. 2008. Effects of thermal treatments on five different waste activated sludge samples solubilization, physical properties and anaerobic digestion. Chem. Eng. J. 139:236-244. crossref(new window)

6.
Boyle, W.C. 1976. Energy recovery from sanitary landfills-a review. In: Schlegel, H.G., and, J., Barnea (Eds.), Microbial Energy Conversion. Pergamon Press Oxford, 119-138.

7.
Chynoweth, D.P., C.E. Turick, J.M, Owens, D.E. Jer, and M.W. Peck. 1993. Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks. Biomass Bioenerg. 5:95-111. crossref(new window)

8.
Fernadez, B., P. Porrier, and R. Chamy. 2001. Effect of inoculum substrate ratio on the start up of solid waste anaerobic digesters. Water Sci. Technol. 44(4):103-108.

9.
Hansen, T.L., J.E. Schmidt., I. Angelidaki., E. Marca., J.C. Jansen., H. Mosbæk, and T.H. Christensen. 2004. Measurement of methane potentials of solid organic waste. Waste Manage. 24(4):393-400. crossref(new window)

10.
Hashimoto, A.G. 1989. Effect of inoculum/substrate ratio on methane yield and production rate from straw. Biol. Waste. 28:247-255. crossref(new window)

11.
Kim, S.H., H.C. Kim., C.H. Kim, and Y.M. Yoon. 2010. The measurement of biochemical methane potential in the several organic waste resources. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 43(3):356-362

12.
Lawrence, A.W, and P.L. McCarty. 1967. Kinetics of methane fermentation in anaerobic waste treatment. Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, PaloAlto, California.

13.
Lay, J.J., Y.Y. Li, and T. Noike. 1998. Development of bacterial population and Methanogenic activity in a laboratory-scale landfill bioreactor. Water Res. 32:3673-3679. crossref(new window)

14.
Liu, C., B. Xiao., A. Dauta., G. Peng., S. Liu, and Z. Hu. 2009. Effect of low power ultrasonic radiation on anaerobic biodegradability of sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol. 100(24):6217-6222. crossref(new window)

15.
Luste, S., S. Luostarinen, and M. Sillanpaa. 2009. Effect of pre-treatments on hydrolysis and methane production potentials of by-products from meat- processing industry. J. Hazard. Mater. 164:247-255. crossref(new window)

16.
Martins, S.I.F.S., W.M.F. Jongen, and M.A.J.S. Boekel. 2001. A review of maillard reaction in food and implications to kinetic modelling. Trends food Sci. Technol. 11:364-373.

17.
MKE. 2008. The 3rd basic plan for the use and development of new-renewable energy (2009-2030) (in Korean).

18.
Mottet, A., J.P. Steyer., S. Deleris., F. Vedrinne., J. Chauzy, and H. Carrere. 2009. Kinetics of thermophilic batch anaerobic digestion of thermal hydrolysed waste activated sludge. Biochem. Eng. J. 46:169-175. crossref(new window)

19.
Neves, L., R. Oliveira, and M.M. Alves. 2004. Influence of inoculums activity on the bio-methanization of a kitchen waste under different waste/inoculum ratios. Process Biochem. 39(12):2019-2024. crossref(new window)

20.
Owens, J.M, and D.P. Chynoweth. 1993. Biochemical methane potential of municipal solid-waste (MSW) components. Water Sci. Technol. 27(2):1-14. crossref(new window)

21.
Palatsi, J., J. Illa., F.X. Prenafeta-Boldú., M. Laureni., B. Fernandez., I. Angelidaki, and X. Flotats. 2010. Long-chain fatty acids inhibition and adaptation process in anaerobic thermophilic digestion: batch tests, microbial community structure and mathematical modelling. Bioresour Technol. 101(7):2243-2251. crossref(new window)

22.
Raposo, F., R. Borja., B. Rincon, and A.M. Jimenez. 2008. Assessment of process control parameters in the biochemical methane potential of sunflower oil cake. Biomass Bioenerg. 32:1235-1244. crossref(new window)

23.
Salminen, E., J. Einola, and J. Rintala. 2003. The methane production of poultry slaughtering residues and effects of pre-treatments on the methane production of poulty feather. Environ. Technol. 24:1079-1086. crossref(new window)

24.
Shin, K.S., C.H. Kim., S.E. Lee, and Y.M. Yoon. 2011. Biochemical methane potential of agricultural waste biomass. Korea J. soil Sci. Fert. 44(5):903-915. crossref(new window)

25.
orensen, A.H., M. Winther-Nielsen, and B.K. Ahring. 1991. Kinetics of lactate, acetate and propionate in unadapted and lactate-adapted thermophilic, anaerobic sewage sludge: the influence of sludge adaptation for start-up of thermophilic UASB-reactors. Micro biol. biotechnol. 34:823-827.

26.
Williams, A., M. Amat-Marco, and M.D. Collins. 1996. Pylogenetic analysis of Butyrivibrio strains reveals three distinct groups of species within the Clostridium subphylm of gram-positive bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Bacterol. 46:195-199. crossref(new window)

27.
Yoon, Y.M., C.H. Kim., Y.J. Kim, and H.T Pack. 2009. The economical evaluation of biogas production facility of pig waste. Korean J. Agricul. Manage. Policy 36(1):137-157.