JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Fly Ash Application Effects on CH4 and CO2 Emission in an Incubation Experiment with a Paddy Soil
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Fly Ash Application Effects on CH4 and CO2 Emission in an Incubation Experiment with a Paddy Soil
Lim, Sang-Sun; Choi, Woo-Jung; Kim, Han-Yong; Jung, Jae-Woon; Yoon, Kwang-Sik;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
To estimate potential use of fly ash in reducing and emission from soil, and fluxes from a paddy soil mixed with fly ash at different rate (w/w; 0, 5, and 10%) in the presence and absence of fertilizer N () addition were investigated in a laboratory incubation for 60 days under changing water regime from wetting to drying via transition. The mean flux during the entire incubation period ranged from 0.59 to with a lower rate in the soil treated with N fertilizer due to suppression of production by that acts as an electron acceptor, leading to decreases in electron availability for methanogen. Fly ash application reduced flux by 37.5 and 33.0% in soils without and with N addition, respectively, probably due to retardation of diffusion through soil pores by addition of fine-textured fly ash. In addition, as fly ash has a potential for removal via carbonation (formation of carbonate precipitates) that decreases availability that is a substrate for reduction reaction (one of generation pathways) is likely to be another mechanisms of flux reduction by fly ash. Meanwhile, the mean flux during the entire incubation period was between 0.64 and , and that of N treated soil was lower than that without N addition. Because N addition is likely to increase soil respiration, it is not straightforward to explain the results. However, it may be possible that our experiment did not account for the substantial amount of produced by heterotrophs that were activated by N addition in earlier period than the measurement was initiated. Fly ash application also lowered flux by up to 20% in the soil mixed with fly ash at 10% through removal by the carbonation. At the whole picture, fly ash application at 10% decreased global warming potential of emitted and by about 20%. Therefore, our results suggest that fly ash application can be a soil management practice to reduce green house gas emission from paddy soils. Further studies under field conditions with rice cultivation are necessary to verify our findings.
 Keywords
emission; emission;Chemical fertilizer;Fly ash, Carbonation;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
Effect of By-Product Gypsum Fertilizer on Methane Gas Emissions and Rice Productivity in Paddy Field,;;;;;;;;;;

한국토양비료학회지, 2016. vol.49. 1, pp.30-35 crossref(new window)
1.
Effect of By-Product Gypsum Fertilizer on Methane Gas Emissions and Rice Productivity in Paddy Field, Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 2016, 49, 1, 30  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Bedard, C. and R. Knowles. 1989. Physiology, biochemistry, and specific inhibitors of $CH_{4}$, $NH_{4}^{+}$, and CO oxidation by methanotrophs and nitrifiers. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 53:68-84.

2.
Chang, A.C., L.J. lund, A.L. Page, and J.E. Warneke. 1977. Physical properties of fly ash amended soils. J. Environ. Qual. 6(3):267-270.

3.
Chen, R., X. Lin, Y. Wang, and J. Hu. 2011. Mitigating methane emissions from irrigated paddy fields by application of aerobically composted livestock manures in eastern China. Soil Use Manage. 27:103-109. crossref(new window)

4.
Dalal, R.C., D.E. Allen, S.J. Livesley, and G. Richards. 2008. Magnitude and biophysical regulators of methane emission and consumption in the Australian agricultural, forest, and submerged landscapes: a review. Plant Soil 309:43-76. crossref(new window)

5.
Denmead, O.T. 1995. Novel meterological methods for measuring trace gas fluxes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 351:383-396. crossref(new window)

6.
Dunfield, P., R. Knowles, R. Dumpont, and T.R. Moore. 1993. Methane production and consumption in temperate and subarctic peat soils - response to temperature and pH. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25:321-326. crossref(new window)

7.
Ellert, B.H. and H.H. Janzen. 2008. Nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide and methane emission from irrigated cropping systems as influenced by legumes, manure and fertilizer. Can. J. Soil Sci. 88:207-217. crossref(new window)

8.
Gee, G.W. and J.W. Bauder. 1986. Particle size analysis. p. 383-412. In Campbell, G.S. et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis, Part 1, Physical and mineralogical methods. Soil Sci. Soc. of Am., Madison, Wi, USA.

9.
Halvorson, A.D., B.J. Wienhold, and A.L. Black. 2002. Tillage, nitrogen, and cropping system effects on soil carbon sequestration. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66:906-912. crossref(new window)

10.
Husch, B.W. 1998. Methane oxidation in arable soil as inhibited by ammonium, nitrite, and organic manure with respect to soil pH. Biol. Fertil. Soils 28:27-35. crossref(new window)

11.
Houghton, R.A. 2007. Balancing the global carbon budget. Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc. 35:313-347. crossref(new window)

12.
Inobushi, K., Y. Furukawa, N. Shibasaki, M. Ali., A.M. Itang, and H. Tsurta. 2005. Factors influencing methane emission from peat soils, comparison of tropical and temperate wetlands. Nutrient Cycl. Agroecosys. 71:93-99. crossref(new window)

13.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, New York.

14.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climatic change. Cambridge University Press, New York.

15.
Jala, S. and D. Goyal. 2006. Fly ash as a soil ameliorant for improving crop production-a review. Bioresour. Technol. 97:1136-1147. crossref(new window)

16.
Jastrow, J.D., E.J. Amonette, and V.L. Bailey. 2007. Mechanisms controlling soil carbon turnover and their potential application for enhancing carbon sequestration. Climatic Change 80:5-23. crossref(new window)

17.
Klubek, B., C.L. Carson, J. Oliver, and D.C. Adriano. 1992. Characterization of microbial abundance and activity from three coal fly ash basin. Soil Biol. Biochem. 24:1119-1125. crossref(new window)

18.
Lee, H., S.H. Ha, C.H. Lee, Y.B. Lee, and P.J. Kim. 2006. Fly ash effect on improving soil properties and rice productivity in Korean paddy soils. Bioresour. Technol. 97:1490-1497. crossref(new window)

19.
Lee, S.B., Y.B. Lee, C.H. Lee, C.O. Hong, P.J. Kim, and C. Yu. 2008. Characteristics of boron accumulation by fly ash application in paddy soil. Bioresour. Technol. 99:5928-5932. crossref(new window)

20.
Lee, S.I., S.S. Lim, K.S. Lee, D.S. Lee, J.H. Kwak, X. Hao, H.M. Ro, and W.J. Choi. 2011. Kinetic responses of soil carbon dioxide emission to increasing urea application rate. Korean J. Envrion, Agric. 30:209-215. crossref(new window)

21.
Lim, S.S., W.J. Choi, and H.Y. Kim. 2012a. Fertilizer and organic inputs effects on $CO_{2}$ and $CH_{4}$ emission from a soil under changing water regimes. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 31(2):104-112. crossref(new window)

22.
Lim, S.S., W.J. Choi, K.S. Lee, and H.R. Ro. 2012b. Reduction in $CO_{2}$ emission from normal and saline soils amended with coal fly ash. J. Soils Sediment 12:1299-1308. crossref(new window)

23.
Mandal, B., B. Majumder, P.K. Bandyopadhay, G.C. Hazra, A. Gangopadhyay, R.N. Samantaray, A.K. Mishra, J. Chaudhury, M.N. Saha, and S. Kundu. 2007. The potential of cropping systems and soil amendments for carbon sequestration in soils under long-term experiments in subtropical India. Global Change Biol. 13:357-369. crossref(new window)

24.
Maroto-Valer, M.M., Z. Lu, Y. Zhang, and Z. Tang. 2008. Sorbents for $CO_{2}$ capture from high carbon fly ashes. Waste Manage. 28:2320-2328. crossref(new window)

25.
McCarty, G.W., R. Siddaramappa, R.J. Wright, E.E. Codling, and G. Gao. 1994. Sorbents for $CO_{2}$ capture from high carbon fly ashes. Waste Manage 28:2320-228.

26.
Meijide, A., L.M. Cardenas, L. Sanchez-Martin, and A. Vallejo. 2010. Caron dioxide and methane fluxes from a barely field amended with organic fertilizers under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Plant Soil 328:353-367. crossref(new window)

27.
Mer, J.L. and P. Roger. 2001. Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: A review. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 37:25-50. crossref(new window)

28.
Montes-Hernandez, G., R. Prez-Lopez, F. Renard, J.M. Nieto, and L. Charelt. 2009. Mineral sequestration of $CO_{2}$ by aqueous carbonation of coal combustion fly-ash. J. Hazard. Mater. 161:1347-1354. crossref(new window)

29.
Nable, R.O, G.S. Banuelos, and J.G. Paull. 1997. Boron toxicity. Plant Soil 193:181-198. crossref(new window)

30.
Nouchi, I. and S. Yonemura. 2005. $CO_{2}$, $CH_{4}$ and $N_{2}O$ fluxes from soybean and barely double-cropping in relation to tillage in Japan. Phyton-ann. Rei. Bot. A. 45:327-338.

31.
Nyberg, G., A. Ekblad, R. Buresh, and P. Hogberg. 2002. Short-term patterns of carbon and nitrogen mineralization in a fallow field amended with green manures from agroforesty trees. Biol. Fert. Soils 36:18-25. crossref(new window)

32.
Pandey, V.C. and N. Singh. 2010. Impact of fly ash incorporation in soil systems. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 136:16-27. crossref(new window)

33.
Sumner, M.E. and W.P. Miller. 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficient. p. 1201-1229. In Sparks, et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis, Part3, Chemical methods. Soil Sci. Soc. of Am., Madison, Wi, USA.

34.
Wang, Z.P., C.W. Lindau, R.D. Delaune, and W.H. Patrick. 1993. Soil redox and pH effects on methane production in a flooded rice soil. Soil Science Soc. Am. J. 57:382-385. crossref(new window)

35.
Wong, M.H. and J.W.C. Wong. 1986. Effects of fly ash on soil microbial activity. Environ. Pollut. Ser. A. 40:127-144. crossref(new window)

36.
Yun, S.I., B.M. Kang, S.S. Lim, W.J. Choi, J. Ko, J. Yoon, H.M. Ro, and H.Y. Kim. 2012. Further understanding [$CH_{4}$ emission from a flooded rice field exposed to experimental with elevated [$CO_{2}$]. Agric. For. Meteorol. 154-155:75-83. crossref(new window)