JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Self-rated ability to follow instructions for four mental states described in yoga texts
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : TANG [HUMANITAS MEDICINE]
  • Volume 2, Issue 3,  2012, pp.28.1-28.4
  • Publisher : Association of Humanitas Medicine
  • DOI : 10.5667/tang.2012.0023
 Title & Authors
Self-rated ability to follow instructions for four mental states described in yoga texts
Ramachandra, Raghavendra Bhat; Telles, Shirley; Hongasandra, Nagendra Rama Rao;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
There were no studies available measuring the ability to follow instructions for meditation. Hence, the present study was planned to assess the ability to follow instructions for the four mental states viz., cancalata (random thinking), ekagrata (non-meditative concentration), dharana (focused meditation) and dhyana (defocused meditation or effortless meditation) described in yoga texts. Sixty male volunteers with ages ranging from 18 to 31 years (group mean age S.D., ) participated in the study. They were assessed using a visual analog scale immediately after each of the four states on four different days. The results showed that following dharana, scores on the visual analog scale were significantly lower compared to those related to cancalata, ekagrata and dhyana. Hence, dharana is the most difficult of the four states.
 Keywords
four mental states;cancalata;ekagrata;dharana;dhyana;visual analog scale;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Aitken RC. Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med. 1969;62:989-993.

2.
Cahn BR, Polich J. Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies. Psychol Bull. 2006;132:180-211. crossref(new window)

3.
Don L. Goldenberg, Kenneth H, Kaplan, Maureen G, Nadeau, Brodeur C, Smith S, Christopher H, Schmid A. Controlled Study of a Stress-Reduction, Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Program in Fibromyalgia. J Musculoskeletal Pain. 1994;2:53-66. crossref(new window)

4.
Hayes MHS, Patterson DG. Experimental development of the graphic rating method. Psychol Bull. 1921;18:98-99.

5.
Keng SL, Smoski MJ, Robins CJ. Effects of mindfulness on psychological health: a review of empirical studies. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31:1041-1056. crossref(new window)

6.
Kumar S, Nagendra HR, Naveen KV, Manjunath NK, Telles S. Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials in two meditative mental states. Int J Yoga. 2010;3:37-41. crossref(new window)

7.
Kumar S, Telles S. Meditative states based on yoga texts and their effects on performance of a cancellation task. Percept Mot Skills. 2009;109:679-689. crossref(new window)

8.
Little BC, Zahn TP. Changes in Mood and Autonomic Functioning During the Menstrual Cycle. Psychophysiology. 1974;11:579-590 crossref(new window)

9.
Lutz A, Slagter HA, Dunne JD, Davidson RJ. Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008;12:163-169. crossref(new window)

10.
Sarasvati M, Swami G. Bhagavad Gita. (Calcutta, India: Advaita Ashrama), 1998

11.
Solberg EE, Berglund KA, Engen O, Ekeberg O, Loeb M. The effect of meditation on shooting performance. Br J Sports Med. 1996;30:342-346. crossref(new window)

12.
Taimini IK. The science of yoga. (Madras, India: The Theosophical Publishing House), 1986.

13.
Telles S, Raghavendra BR, Naveen KV, Manjunath NK, Subramanya P. Mid-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials in 2 Meditative States. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2012;43:154-160. crossref(new window)

14.
Travis F, Shear J. Focused attention, open monitoring and automatic self-transcending: categories to organize meditations from Vedic, Buddhist and Chinese traditions. Conscious Cogn. 2010;19:1110-1118. crossref(new window)

15.
Ulger O, Yağli NV. Effects of yoga on the quality of life in cancer patients. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2010;16:60-63. crossref(new window)

16.
Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13:227-236. crossref(new window)