JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Assesment of Load and Resistance Factored Design Value for PHC Driven Pile
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Assesment of Load and Resistance Factored Design Value for PHC Driven Pile
Park, Jong-Bae; Park, Yong-Boo; Lee, Bum-Sik; Kim, Sang-Yeon;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Driving a prefabricated pile is the efficient construction method with low cost and excellent bearing capacity charateristics. But pile drinving method has often been changed to bored pile method with mechanical boring due to the unexpected problems occurred in the various domestic ground condition with landfill. So, pile driving method has more uncertainty than the Bored Pile method. This paper proposed LRFD design value which is one of limit states design method for the PHC driven pile used as building foundation to guarantee the reliable design with reduced uncertainty. This paper analysed 221 dynamic load test results(E.O.I.D : 93, Resrike : 128) and the different methods of estimating bearing design(Meyerhof method & SPT-CPT conversion method), and proposed LRFD value for each design reliability Index 2.33 and 3.0 for PHC driven pile. LRFD value of PHC driven pile represents 0.43~0.55 for Meyerhof method and 0.40~0.49 for SPT-CPT conversion method according to the deign reliability index.
 Keywords
PHC Pile;Driven Pile;Limit States Design Method;LRFD(Load and Resistance Factored Design Method);Deign Reliability Index;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
국토해양부(2010), 도로교 설계기준 해설, 한국도로교통협회, 838-848.

2.
국토해양부, 한국건설교통기술평가원(2008), LRFD 기초구조물 설계를 위한 저항계수 결정 연구, 한국건설기술연구원.

3.
국토해양부(2009), 구조물 기초 설계기준 해설, 한국지반공학회, 304-307.

4.
박종배, 김상연, 이범식, 박용부, 임해식, 최경륜, 김동수, 김범주 (2011), "말뚝기초의 설계법 선진화 및 시공법 다양화", LH 토지주택연구원, 90-173.

5.
KBC (2009), 건축구조기준 및 해설(강구조편), 대한건축학회, 28-30.

6.
AASHTO (2007), LRFD Bridge and Construction Specifications, AASHTO, Washington, D. C.

7.
Bustamante, M. and L. Gianeselli (1982), "Pile Bearing Capacity Prediction by Means of Static Penetrometer CPT", Proc. of 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, 493-500.

8.
Goble, G. G. (1999), Geotechnical Related Development and Implementation of Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Methods, NCHRP Program, Synthesis of Highway Practice 276, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C.

9.
Meyerhof, G. G. (1976), "Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Pile Foundations", Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 102(GT3): 196-228.

10.
Robertson, P. K., R. G. Campanella (1983), "SPT-CPT Correlations", Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 109(11): 1449-1459. crossref(new window)

11.
Van Impe, W., E. E. DeBeer and E. Louisberg (1988), "Prediction of Single Pile Bearing Capacity in Granular Soils from CPT Results", Procedings of the 1st International Symposium on Penetration Testing, ISOPT-1, Specialty Session, Orlando, Fla, March 20-24, 1-34.

12.
Withiam, J. L., E. P. Voytko, R. M. Barker, J. M. Duncan, B. C. Kelly, S. C. Musser and V. Elias (2001), Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) for Highway Bridge Substructures, Publication No FHWA HI-98-032, NHI Course No.13068, Federal Highway Administration, Washington D. C.

13.
Yoon, G. L., and M. W. O'Neill(1997), "Resistance Factors for Single Driven Piles from Experiments", Transportation Research Record, 1569: 47-54. crossref(new window)