JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Evaluation of the Relationship between Geogrid Rib Size and Particle Size Distribution of Ballast Materials using Discrete Element Method
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Evaluation of the Relationship between Geogrid Rib Size and Particle Size Distribution of Ballast Materials using Discrete Element Method
Pi, Ji-Hyun; Oh, Jeongho;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study evaluated the shear behavior of geogrid reinforced ballast material using a large scale direct shear test and discrete element method (DEM) based on PFC 3D program. The direct shear test was conducted on ballast materials that have different particle size distributions. Whereas the test results revealed that the shear strength generally increased with the larger particle size of ballast material without geogrid reinforcement, the shear behavior of ballast material was found to change pertaining to the relationship between particle size distribution and geogrid rib size. Generally, it is deemed the effectiveness of reinforcement can be achieved when the rib size is two times greater than average particle size. A numerical analysis based on DEM was conducted to verify the test results. The geogrid modeling was successfully completed by calibration process along with sensitivity analysis to have actual tensile strength provided by manufacturer. With a given geogrid model, the parametric evaluation was further carried out to examine the interactive behavior between geogrid and ballast material. Consequently, it was found that the effectiveness zone of geogrid reinforcement generated within a specific depth.
 Keywords
Geogrid;Direct shear test;Particle size distribution;Discrete element method;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Cheng Chen, G., McDowell, R. and Thom, N. H. (2012). "Discrete element modelling of cyclic loads of geogrid-reinforced ballast under confined and unconfined conditions." Geotextiles and Geomembranes 35, pp. 76-86. crossref(new window)

2.
Indraratna, B., Shahin, M. A. and Salim, W. (2005). "Use of geosynthetics for stabilizing recycled ballast in railway track substructures." Proceedings of NAGS2005/GRI19 Cooperative Conference, USA, North American Geosynthetics Society, pp. 13-15.

3.
Itasca (2003). Particle Flow Code in Three Dimensions. Itasca Consulting Group. Inc. Minnesota.

4.
Kwan, C. C. (2006). Geogrid reinforcement of railway ballast, Ph.D. thesis. The University of Nottingham.

5.
Lu, M. and McDowell, G. R. (2006). Discerete element modeling of ballast abrasion, Geotechnique, Vol. 56, No. 9, pp. 651-655. crossref(new window)

6.
Mishra, D., Kazmee, H., Tutumluer, E., Pforr, J., Read, D. and Gehringe, E. (2013). "Characterization of railroad ballast behavior under repeated loading: Results from New Large Triaxial Test Setup. Transportation Research Record." Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2374), pp. 169-179. crossref(new window)

7.
Oh, J. H. (2013). "Parametric study on geogrid-reinforced track substructure." IJR International Journal of Railway, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 59-63. crossref(new window)

8.
Pi, J. H. (2015). Evaluation of Geogrid-Reinforced Track Substructure Effectiveness Using a Laboratory Test and Discrete Element Method, Ms. Thesis, Korea National University of Transportation.

9.
Potyondy, D. O. and Cundall, P. A. (2004). "A bonded-particle model for rock." International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 41, pp. 1329-1364. crossref(new window)