JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Study on the Need of Specialized Institution for Post-Evaluation of Construction Projects
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Study on the Need of Specialized Institution for Post-Evaluation of Construction Projects
Lee, Du-Heon; Park, Hee-Sung;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The post-evaluation system after construction projects can evaluate estimates of use demand, project cost, and project schedule estimated in the planning phase of construction projects in public sector. Thus, it was introduced in 2000 for the purpose of reduction in future errors during similar constructions by project orderer by referring the post-evaluation results. However, many barriers to the post-evaluation system after construction projects have been reported due to evaluation systems that lack objectivity and reliability and lack of main bodies that utilize the system. Thus, this study derived implications for improvements of the post-evaluation system in Korea by benchmarking building project evaluation system and management as well as utilization systems of developed nations. Then this study conducted a survey with experts who have experienced activities in the post-evaluation committee and members of post-evaluation for public project owners. Therefore it identified the need of installation of specialized post-evaluation institutions as well as functions and work tasks to be taken by specialized institutions. Based on the analysis results, this paper provided revision drafts of related legislations and guidelines to be effective in post-evaluation. Through the study results, many trial and errors can be reduced in similar projects in the future by performing in-depth analysis on large-scale construction projects and repeatedly applied building project practices can be improved to raise technical competitiveness if the specialized institution is installed.
 Keywords
Post-evaluation of construction projects;Specialized institutions;Benchmarking;Performance measurement;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Construction Industry Institute (CII) (2009). The Alberta Report.

2.
Construction Industry Institute (CII) (2011). How to Benchmark with CII.

3.
Highways Agency (2014). Post Opening Project Evaluation of Major Schemes.

4.
Lee, D. H. and Park, J. W. (2013). "Improvement scheme of utilization of the results of the post-construction evaluation system." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 78-89 (in Korean).

5.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) (2014). A Study on Support and Management System for Post-construction Evaluation (in Korean).

6.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2014). Introduction to Post Evaluation of Construction, Available at: www.mlit,go,jp/tec/hyouka/public/09_public_01b.html (Accessed: June 10, 2014) (in Japanese).

7.
National Assembly Budget Office (2015). Fiscal Year 2014 Fiscal Program Performance Evaluation_Economic and Industrial Programs, pp. 76-86 (in Korean).

8.
National Assembly Research Service (2013). Issues on the Preliminary Feasibility Planning System and Tasks for Improvement, pp. 40-44 (in Korean).