JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Deformation-based seismic design of concrete bridges
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Earthquakes and Structures
  • Volume 9, Issue 5,  2015, pp.1045-1067
  • Publisher : Techno-Press
  • DOI : 10.12989/eas.2015.9.5.1045
 Title & Authors
Deformation-based seismic design of concrete bridges
Gkatzogias, Konstantinos I.; Kappos, Andreas J.;
 Abstract
A performance-based design (PBD) procedure, initially proposed for the seismic design of buildings, is tailored herein to the structural configurations commonly adopted in bridges. It aims at the efficient design of bridges for multiple performance levels (PLs), achieving control over a broad range of design parameters (i.e., strains, deformations, ductility factors) most of which are directly estimated at the design stage using advanced analysis tools (a special type of inelastic dynamic analysis). To evaluate the efficiency of the proposed design methodology, it is applied to an actual bridge that was previously designed using a different PBD method, namely displacement-based design accounting for higher mode effects, thus enabling comparison of the alternative PBD approaches. Assessment of the proposed method using nonlinear dynamic analysis for a set of spectrum-compatible motions, indicate that it results in satisfactory performance of the bridge. Comparison with the displacement-based method reveals significant cost reduction, albeit at the expense of increased computational effort.
 Keywords
deformation-based design;direct displacement-based design;nonlinear dynamic analysis;bridges;reinforced concrete;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
AASHTO (2011), Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design, WA, USA.

2.
ATC (1996), Improved Seismic Design Criteria for California Bridges: Provisional Recommendations, CA, USA.

3.
ATC/MCEER (2004), Recommended LRFD Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Highway Bridges. Part I:Specifications, Part II: Commentary and Appendices, CA, USA.

4.
Bardakis, V.G. and Fardis, M.N (2011), "A displacement-based seismic design procedure for concrete bridges having deck integral with the piers", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 9(2), 537-560. crossref(new window)

5.
Biskinis, D. and Fardis, M.N. (2010), "Flexure-controlled ultimate deformations of members with continuous or lap-spliced bars", Struct. Concrete, 11(2), 93-108. crossref(new window)

6.
Caltrans (California Department of Transportation) (2013), Seismic Design Criteria, (ver. 1.7), CA, USA.

7.
Caltrans (2014), Bridge Memo to Designers, CA, USA.

8.
Cardone, D. (2014), "Displacement limits and performance displacement profiles in support of direct displacement-based seismic assessment of bridges", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 43(8), 1239-1263. crossref(new window)

9.
Carr, A.J. (2006) Ruaumoko 3D: Inelastic dynamic analysis program. University of Canterbury, NZ.

10.
CEN (Comite Europeen de Normalisation) (2004a), Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures - Part 1-1:General Rules and Rules for Buildings (EN1992-1-1), Brussels, Belgium.

11.
CEN (2004b), Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings (EN1998-1), Brussels, Belgium.

12.
CEN (2005a), Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 2: Bridges (EN1998-2), Brussels, Belgium.

13.
CEN (2005b), Structural Bearings - Part 3: Elastomeric bearings (EN1337-3), Brussels, Belgium.

14.
Chiou, B., Darragh, R., Gregor, N. and Silva, W. (2008), "NGA project strong-motion database", Earthq. Spectra, 24(1), 23-44. crossref(new window)

15.
Choi, E., DesRoches, R. and Nielson, B. (2004), "Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones", Eng. Struct., 26(2), 187-199. crossref(new window)

16.
Constantinou, M.C., Kalpakidis, I., Filiatrault, A. and Ecker Lay, R.A. (2011), LRFD-based analysis and design procedures for bridge bearings and seismic isolators, MCEER Report No. 11-0004, NY, USA.

17.
CSI (Computers and Structures Inc.) (2009), SAP2000: Three dimensional static and dynamic finite element analysis and design of structures, CA, USA.

18.
Fardis, M.N., Kolias, B. and Pecker, A. (2012), Designer's Guide to Eurocode 8: Design of Bridges for Earthquake Resistance EN 1998-2, ICE Publishing, London, UK.

19.
FEMA (2009), NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures, WA, USA.

20.
FHWA (2006), Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1 - Bridges, NY, USA.

21.
fib (federation internationale du beton) (2003), Bulletin No.25: Displacement-based seismic design of reinforced concrete buildings, Lausanne, Switzerland.

22.
fib (2007), Bulletin No.39: Seismic bridge design and retrofit - structural solutions, Lausanne, Switzerland.

23.
Google Earth 7.1.2.2041 (2011), Greece $41^{\circ}$01'18.50'' N, $24^{\circ}$41'20.66'' E, elevation 268 ft, eye altitude 191 ft, Street View, US Dept. of State Geographer 2014, [Viewed 3 November 2014].

24.
Kappos, A.J. (1991), "Analytical prediction of the collapse earthquake for R/C buildings: Suggested methodology", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 20(2), 167-176. crossref(new window)

25.
Kappos, A.J. (1997), Partial inelastic analysis procedure for optimum capacity design of buildings, Eds. Fajfar, P. and Krawinkler, H., Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, Balkelma(CRC Press), Rotterdam, Netherlands.

26.
Kappos, A.J. (2015), Performance-based seismic design and assessment of bridges, Ed. Ansal, A., Perspectives on European Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (Vol.2), Springer.

27.
Kappos, A.J. and Manafpour, A. (2001), "Seismic design of R/C buildings with the aid of advanced analytical techniques", Eng. Struct., 23(4), 319-332. crossref(new window)

28.
Kappos, A.J. and Panagopoulos, G. (2004), "Performance-based seismic design of 3D R/C buildings using inelastic static and dynamic analysis procedures", ISET J. Earthq. Technol., 41(1), 141-158.

29.
Kappos, A.J. and Stefanidou, S. (2010), "A deformation-based seismic design method for 3D R/C irregular buildings using inelastic dynamic analysis", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 8(4), 875-895. crossref(new window)

30.
Kappos, A.J., Gidaris, I.G. and Gkatzogias, K.I. (2012), "Problems associated with direct displacementbased design of concrete bridges with single-column piers, and some suggested improvements", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 10(4), 1237-1266. crossref(new window)

31.
Kappos, A.J., Gkatzogias, K.I. and Gidaris, I.G. (2013), "Extension of direct displacement-based design methodology for bridges to account for higher mode effects", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(4), 581-602. crossref(new window)

32.
Kappos, A.J., Goutzika, E. and Stefanidou, S. (2007) "An improved performance-based design method for 3D R/C buildings using inelastic analysis", ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Rethymno.

33.
Katsanos, E.I. and Sextos, A.G. (2013), "ISSARS: An integrated software environment for structure-specific earthquake ground motion selection", Adv. Eng. Software, 58, 70-85. crossref(new window)

34.
Katsaras, C.P., Panagiotakos, T.B. and Kolias, B. (2009), "Effect of torsional stiffness of prestressed concrete box girders and uplift of abutment bearings on seismic performance of bridges", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 7(2), 363-375. crossref(new window)

35.
Konstantinidis, D., Kelly, J. and Makris, N. (2008), Experimental investigation on the seismic response of bridge bearings, UCB/EERC Report No. 2008/02, CA, USA.

36.
Kowalsky, M.J. (2000), "Deformation limit states for circular reinforced concrete bridge columns", J. Struct. Eng., 126(8), 869-878. crossref(new window)

37.
Mori, A., Moss, P.J., Carr, A.J. and Cooke, N. (1997), "Behaviour of laminated elastomeric bearings", Struct. Eng. Mech., 5(4), 451-469. crossref(new window)

38.
Moschonas, I.F., Kappos, A.J., Panetsos, P. Papadopoulos, V., Makarios, T. and Thanopoulos, P. (2008), "Seismic fragility curves for greek bridges: Methodology and case studies", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 7(2), 439-468.

39.
NZTA (New Zealand Transport Agency) (2013), Bridge Manual (SP/M/022), Wellington, New Zealand.

40.
Padgett, J.E. (2007), "Seismic vulnerability assessment of retrofitted bridges using probabilistic methods", Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, GA, USA.

41.
Paraskeva, T.S., Kappos, A.J. and Sextos, A.G. (2006), "Extension of modal pushover analysis to seismic assessment of bridges", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(10), 1269-1293. crossref(new window)

42.
Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2007), Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.

43.
Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F. and Calvi, G.M. (1996), Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, Wiley, NY, USA.

44.
Sextos, A.G., Pitilakis, K.D. and Kappos, A.J. (2003), "Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil-structure interaction phenomena. Part 1:Methodology and analytical tools", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(4), 607-627. crossref(new window)