JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Evaluation of seismic performance factors for steel DIAGRID structural system design
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Earthquakes and Structures
  • Volume 10, Issue 4,  2016, pp.735-755
  • Publisher : Techno-Press
  • DOI : 10.12989/eas.2016.10.4.735
 Title & Authors
Evaluation of seismic performance factors for steel DIAGRID structural system design
Lee, Dongkyu; Shin, Soomi; Ju, Youngkyu;
 Abstract
This article presents a proposed analytical methodology to determine seismic force-resisting system R-values for steel diagrid framed systems. As current model building codes do not explicitly address the seismic design performance factors for this new and emerging structural system, the purpose of this study is to provide a sound and reliable basis for defining such seismic design parameters. An approach and methodology for the reliable determination of seismic performance factors for use in the design of steel diagrid framed structural systems is proposed. The recommended methodology is based on current state-of-the-art and state-of-the practice methods including structural nonlinear dynamic analysis techniques, testing data requirements, building code design procedures and earthquake ground motion characterization. In determining appropriate seismic performance factors (R, , ) for new archetypical building structural systems, the methodology defines acceptably low values of probability against collapse under maximum considered earthquake ground shaking.
 Keywords
diagrid;seismic performance factor;structural system;analytical methodology;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
AISC 341 (2005), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 341-05), including Supplement No. 1 (ANSI/AISC 341s1-05), American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.

2.
AISC 341-05 (2005), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 341-05) including Supplement No. 1 (ANSI/AISC 341s1-05), American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois 60601.

3.
AISC 360 (2005), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-05), American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.

4.
AISC 360-05 (2005), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-05), American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois 60601.

5.
Applied Technology Council (ATC) (2007), Recommended Methodology for Quantification of Building System Performance and Response Parameters-ATC-63 (75% Draft), Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.

6.
ASCE 7-05 (2005), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE 7-05), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, VA.

7.
ATC-63 (2007), Recommended Methodology for Quantification of Building System Performance and Response Parameters (75% Draft), Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.

8.
Black, G.R., Wenger, B.A. and Popov, E.P. (1980), Inelastic buckling of steel struts under cyclic load reversals, Technical Report UCB/EERC-80/40, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.

9.
Chen, L. (2011), Innovative bracing system for earthquake resistant concentrically braced frame structures, Master Thesis Report, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

10.
Computers & Structures, Inc. (CSI) (1978-2006), SAP2000-Linear and Nonlinear Static and Dynamic Analysis and Design of Three Dimensional Structures-Software v. 11, Berkeley, CA.

11.
Computers & Structures, Inc. (CSI) (2007), Perform3D-Nonlinear Analysis and Performance Assessment for 3D Structures-Software v. 4.0.3, Berkeley, CA.

12.
Computers and Structures, Inc. (2000), ETABS Tutorial, Berkely, California, USA.

13.
Deierlein, G.G., Liel, A.B., Haselton, C.B. and Kircher, C.A. (2007), Assessing Building System Collapse Performance and Associated Requirements for Seismic Design, Proceedings SEAOC 2007 Convention, Squaw Creek, CA.

14.
Di Sarno, L. and Elnashai, A.S. (2009), "Bracing systems for seismic retrofitting of steel frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(2), 452-465. crossref(new window)

15.
Dorvash, S., Pakzad, S., Naito, C., Hodgson, I. and Yen, B. (2013), "Application of state-of-the-art in measurement and data analysis techniques for vibration evaluation of a tall building", Struct. Infra. Eng., doi: 10.1080/15732479.2012.757795. crossref(new window)

16.
Dougka, G., Dimakogianni, D. and Vayas, I. (2014), "Seismic behavior of frames with innovative energy dissipation systems (FUSEIS 1-1)", Earthq. Struct., 6(5), 1-14. crossref(new window)

17.
Elnashai, A.S. and Di Sarno, L. (2008), Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering, Wiley.

18.
Fajfar, P. (2005), Structural analysis in earthquake engineering-a breakthrough of simplified non-linear methods, 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper Reference 843.

19.
FEMA-355C (2000). State of the Art Report on Systems Performance of Steel Moment Frames Subject to Earthquake Ground Shaking, Program to Reduce the Earthquake Hazards of Steel Moment-Frame Structures, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

20.
FEMA-450 (2003), NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

21.
Hejazi, F., Toloue, I., Noorzaei, J. and Jaafar, M.S. (2013), "Optimization of earthquake energy dissipation system by genetic algorithm", Comput. Aid. Civ. Infra. Eng., 28(10), 1-15. crossref(new window)

22.
IBC 2006 (2006), International Building Code 2006, International Code Council.

23.
Jiang, X. and Adeli, H. (2008), "Neuro-genetic algorithm for nonlinear active control of highrise buildings", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 75(8), 770-786. crossref(new window)

24.
Kircher, C.A. and Heintz, J.A. (2008), Overview and key concepts of the ATC-63 methodology, Proceedings of ASCE-SEI Structures Congress, Vancouver, B.C.

25.
Lee, D.K., Kim, J.H., Starossek, U. and Shin, S.S. (2012), "Evaluation of structural outrigger belt truss layouts for tall buildings by using topology optimization", Struct. Eng. Mech., 43(6), 711-724. crossref(new window)

26.
Lee, D.K., Park, S.S. and Shin S.M. (2008), "Non-stochastic interval arithmetic-based finite element analysis for structural uncertainty response estimate", Struct. Eng. Mech., 29(5), 469-488. crossref(new window)

27.
Lee, D.K., Lee, J.H., Kim, J.H. and Srarossek, Uwe (2014a), "Investigation on material layouts of structural diagrid frames by using topology optimization", KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 18(2), 549-557. crossref(new window)

28.
Lee, D.K., Ha, T.H., Jung, M.Y. and Kim, J.H. (2014b), "Evaluating high performance steel tube-framed diagrid for high-rise buildings", Steel Compos. Struct., 16(3), 289-303 crossref(new window)

29.
Mele, E., Toreno, M., Brandonisio, G. and Luca, A.D. (2012), "Diagrid structures for tall buildings: case studies and design considerations", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/tal), doi:10.1002/tal.1029. crossref(new window)

30.
Moon, K.S., Connor, J.J. and Fernandez, J.E. (2007), "Diagrid structural systems for tall buildings: characteristics and methodology for preliminary design", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 16(2), 205-230. crossref(new window)

31.
Nuti, C., Rasulo, A. and Vanzi, I. (2010), "Seismic safety of network structures and infrastructures", Struct. Infra. Eng., 6(1-2), 95-110. crossref(new window)

32.
Oosterhuis, K. and Biloria, N. (2008), "Interactions with proactive architectural spaces: the muscle projects", Comm. ACM, 51(6), 70-78.

33.
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley (2006), Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (Opensees), http://opensees.berkeley.edu/.

34.
Petrini, F. and Ciampoli, M. (2012), "Performance-based wind design of tall buildings", Struct. Infra. Eng., 8(10), 954-966.

35.
Sarma, K.C. and Adeli, H. (2002), "Life-cycle cost optimization of steel structures", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 55(12), 1451-1462. crossref(new window)

36.
Uriz, P. and Mahin, S.A. (2008), Toward earthquake resistant design of concentrically braced steel structures, PEER 2008/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.

37.
Winter, U.M. (2011), Super high-rise in Rotterdam, Master Thesis Report, Delft University of Technology.