JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Influence of modified intended use on the seismic behavior of historical himis structures
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Earthquakes and Structures
  • Volume 10, Issue 4,  2016, pp.893-911
  • Publisher : Techno-Press
  • DOI : 10.12989/eas.2016.10.4.893
 Title & Authors
Influence of modified intended use on the seismic behavior of historical himis structures
Cakir, Ferit; Ergen, Yasar B.; Uysal, Habib; Dogangun, Adem;
 Abstract
There are some modifications in the usage purpose of historical structures due to varying needs and changing conditions. However, those modifications can damage the structural system and the system stability. This study focuses on the investigation of the functional effects and usage modifications on the system stability. In this study, three different finite element models of the Hayati Mansion in Turkey are developed and the seismic responses of the models are investigated. Results of the analyses show that usage modifications might be considered as risky in terms of creating problems for seismic performance.
 Keywords
himis structures;the modification of intended usage;seismic analyses;Finite Element Method (FEM);
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
AFAD (2014), Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry, Disaster and Emergency Management Precidency, Earthquake Department, http://www.deprem.gov.tr/sarbis/shared/DepremHaritalari.aspx.

2.
Akan, A.E. and Ozen, O. (2005), "Seismic analysis of the green tomb in Bursa using Finite Element Method", Earthquake Symposium, Kocaeli, 758-762.

3.
Akan, A.E. (2004), "Some observations on the seismic behaviour of traditional timber structures in Turkey", Master's Thesis, METU, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences.

4.
Akan, A.E. (2010), "Determination of Structural Performance of Timber Pillared Historical Mosques by Finite Element Analysis", SDU Int. Technol. Sci.-Constr. Technol., 2(1), 41-54. (in Turkish)

5.
Bakhteri, J., Mahktar, A.M. and ve Sambasivam, S. (2004), "Finite Element Modelling of structural clay brick masonry subjected to axial compression", J. Teknologi, 41(B), 57-68.

6.
Cakir, F. and Uysal, H. (2014), "Seismic performance of historical masonry clock tower with adjacent walls", Earthq. Struct., 7(2), 217-231. crossref(new window)

7.
Dogan, N. (2010), "Seismic analysis of traditional buildings: Bagdadi and Himis", Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology-A, Applied Sciences and Engineering, Cilt 11, Sayi 1, 35-45.

8.
Dogangun, A., Acar, R., Sezen, H. and Livaoglu, R. (2008), "Investigation of dynamic response of masonry minaret structure", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 6(3), 505-517. crossref(new window)

9.
Dogangun, A., Tuluk, O.I., Acar, R. and Livaoglu, R. (2004), "Timber structural systems in buildings from past to present", Industry Magazine of Timber and Building Materials, Published by Marka Yayincilik, Yil 4, Sayi:22, 2004. (in Turkish)

10.
Dogangun, A., Tuluk, O.I., Livaoglu, R. and Acar, R. (2006), "Traditional wooden buildings and their damages during earthquakes in Turkey", Eng. Fail. Anal., 13(6), 981-996. crossref(new window)

11.
Gonul, B. (2010), "Usage of Historical Structures by Interior Protect", Young Vision on Design Symposium, Istanbul Ticaret University, 33-44. (in Turkish)

12.
Gulkan, P. and Langenbach, R. (2004), "The earthquake resistance of traditional timber and masonry dwellings in Turkey", 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 2297, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.

13.
Hardwick, J. and Little, J., (2010), "Seismic performance of mud brick structures", EWB-UK National Research Conference, London.

14.
IdeCAD Architectural, IdeCAD Software (2007), IdeCAD Ltd. Sti., Ver. 5, Istanbul.

15.
Kocu, N. and Korkmaz, S.Z. (2004), "Determination of seismic effects on adobe materials", TMMOB. Istanbul Chamber of Architects, 2. National Congress of Building Materials, Istanbul, 52-62. (in Turkish)

16.
Kouris, L.A.S. and Kappos, A.J. (2012), "Detailed and simplified non-linear models for timber-framed masonry structures", J. Cultural Herit., 13(1), 47-58. crossref(new window)

17.
Koylu, A. (2008), "Analysis of traditional structures under lateral loads", Master's Thesis, In Civil Engineering, Universty of Eskisehir Osmangazi University. (in Turkish)

18.
Sap 2000 (2012), Integrated Structural Analysis and Desing Software, Computers and Structures, Inc., Ver. 15.1.0, Berkeley, California.

19.
Seker, B.S., Cakir, F., Dogangun, A. and Uysal, H. (2014), "Investigation of a masonry domed mosque by experimental tests and numerical analyses", Earthq. Struct, 6(4), 335-350. crossref(new window)

20.
Soyluk, A. and Tuna, M.E. (2011), "Dynamic analysis of historical sehzade mehmet mosque for base isolation application", J. Faculty Eng. Architec. Gazi Univ., 26(3), 667-675.

21.
Toker, S. and Unay, A.I. (2004), "Mathematical modeling and finite element analysis of masonry arch bridges", G.U. Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(2), 129-139.

22.
TS500 (2000), "Requirements for design and construction of reinforced concrete structures", Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara, Turkey. (in Turkish)

23.
Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC) (2007), Specification for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement Government of Republic of Turkey, Ankara.

24.
Venice Charter (1964), IInd International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Venice, Italy.