JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Experimental study on seismic performances of steel framebent structures
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Earthquakes and Structures
  • Volume 10, Issue 5,  2016, pp.1111-1123
  • Publisher : Techno-Press
  • DOI : 10.12989/eas.2016.10.5.1111
 Title & Authors
Experimental study on seismic performances of steel framebent structures
Liang, Jiongfeng; Gu, Lian S.; Hu, Ming H.;
 Abstract
To study seismic performance of steel frame-bent structure, one specimen with one-tenth scale, three-bay, and five-story was tested under reversed cyclic lateral load. The entire loading process and failure mode were observed, and the seismic performance indexes including hysteretic loops, skeleton curve, ductility, load bearing capacity, drift ratio, energy dissipation capacity and stiffness degradation were analyzed. The results show that the steel frame-bent structure has good seismic performance. And the ductility and the energy dissipation capacity were good, the hysteresis loops were in spindle shape, which shape were full and had larger area. The ultimate elastic-plastic drift ratio is larger than the limit value specified by seismic code, showing the high capacity of collapse resistance. It can be helpful to design this kind of structure in high-risk seismic zone.
 Keywords
steel;frame-bent structure;cyclic lateral load;seismic performance;ductility;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Banihashemi, M.R., Mirzagoltabar, A.R. and Tavakoli, H.R. (2015), "Development of the performance based plastic design for steel moment resistant frame", Int. J. Steel. Struct., 15(1), 51-62. crossref(new window)

2.
Code for design of steel structures(GB50017-2003) (2003), Beijing. (in Chinese)

3.
Code for seismic design of building(GB50011-2010) (2010), Beijing. (in Chinese)

4.
D'Aniello, M., Costanzo, S. and Landolfo, R. (2015), "The influence of beam stiffness on seismic response of chevron concentric bracings", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 112, 305-324. crossref(new window)

5.
Dimopoulos, A.I., Bazeos, N. and Beskos, D.E. (2012), "Seismic yield displacements of plane moment resisting and x-braced steel frames", Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 41, 128-140 crossref(new window)

6.
Grande, E. and Rasulo, A. (2015), "A simple approach for seismic retrofit of low-rise concentric X-braced steel frames", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 107, 162-172 crossref(new window)

7.
Grande, E. and Rasulo, A. (2013), "Seismic assessment of concentric X-braced steel frames", Eng. Struct., 49, 983-995. crossref(new window)

8.
Hassanien Serror, M., Adel diab, R. and Ahmed Mourad, S. (2014), "Seismic force reduction factor for steel moment resisting frames with supplemental viscous dampers", Earthq. Struct., 7(6), 1171-1186. crossref(new window)

9.
Hosseinzadeh. Sh. and Mohebi, B. (2016), "Seismic evaluation of all-steel buckling restrained braces using finite element analysis", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 119, 76-84. crossref(new window)

10.
Hoveidae, N., Tremblay, R., Rafezy, B. and Davaran, A. (2015), "Numerical investigation of seismic behavior of short-core all-steel buckling restrained braces", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 114, 89-99 crossref(new window)

11.
Hsu, H.L. and Li, Z.C. (2015), "Seismic performance of steel frames with controlled buckling mechanisms in knee braces", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 107, 50-60. crossref(new window)

12.
Kamaris, G.S., Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. and Beskos, D.E. (2015), "Direct damage controlled seismic design of plane steel degrading frames", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 13(2), 587-612. crossref(new window)

13.
Lin, Y.C., Sause, R. and Ricles, J.M. (2013), "Seismic performance of steel self-centering, moment-resisting frame: Hybrid simulations under design basis earthquake", J. Struct. Eng., 139(11), 1823-1832. crossref(new window)

14.
Lubliner, J. (2006), Plasticity Theory, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.

15.
Metelli, G. (2013), "Theoretical and experimental study on the cyclic behaviour of X braced steel frames", Eng. Struct., 46, 763-773. crossref(new window)

16.
Ministry of Construction. Specificating of testing methods for earthquake resistant building (JGJ101-96) (1997), Beijing. (in Chinese)

17.
Nguyen, P.C. and Kim, S.E. (2014), "Nonlinear inelastic time-history analysis of three-dimensional semi-rigid steel frames", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 101, 192-206. crossref(new window)

18.
Piedrafita, D., Maimi, P. and Cahis, X. (2015), "A constitutive model for a novel modular all-steel buckling restrained brace", Eng. Struct., 100(1), 326-331. crossref(new window)

19.
Pollino, M. (2015), "Seismic design for enhanced building performance using rocking steel braced frames", Eng. Struct., 83(15), 129-139. crossref(new window)

20.
Salawdeh, S. and Goggins, J. (2013), "Numerical simulation for steel brace members incorporating a fatigue model", Eng. Struct., 46, 332-349. crossref(new window)

21.
Stamatopoulos, G.N. (2014), "Seismic response of steel frames considering the hysteretic behaviour of the semi-rigid supports", Int.J. Steel. Struct., 14(3), 609-618. crossref(new window)

22.
Tenchini, A., D'Aniello, M., Rebelo, C., Landolfo, R., Silva, L.S. and Lima, L. (2014), "Seismic performance of dual-steel moment resisting frames", J. Constr. Steel. Res., 101, 437-454. crossref(new window)

23.
Zahrai, S.M. and Jalali, M. (2014), "Experimental and analytical investigations on seismic behavior of ductile steel knee braced frames", Steel Compos. Struct., 16(1), 1-21. crossref(new window)