JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Seismic performance of single pier skewed bridges with different pier-deck connections
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Earthquakes and Structures
  • Volume 10, Issue 6,  2016, pp.1467-1486
  • Publisher : Techno-Press
  • DOI : 10.12989/eas.2016.10.6.1467
 Title & Authors
Seismic performance of single pier skewed bridges with different pier-deck connections
Attarchiana, Nahid; Kalantari, Afshin; Moghadam, Abdolreza S.;
 Abstract
This research focuses on seismic performance of a class of single pier skewed bridges with three different pier-deck connections; skew angles vary from to . A well-documented four span continuous deck bridge has been modeled and verified. Seat-type connections with fixed and sliding bearings plus monolithic pier-deck connections are studied. Shear keys are considered either fully operational or ineffective. Seismic performances of the bridges and the structural components are investigated conducting bidirectional nonlinear time history analysis in OpenSees. Several global and intermediate engineering demand parameters (EDP) have been studied. On the basis of results, the values of demand parameters of skewed bridges, such as displacement and rotation of the deck plus plastic deformation and torsional demand of the piers, increase as the skew angle increases. In order to eliminate the deck collapse probability, the threshold skew angle is considered as in seat-type bridges. For bridges with skew angles greater than , monolithic pier-deck connections should be applied. The functionality of shear keys is critical in preventing large displacements in the bearings. Pinned piers experience considerable ductility demand at the bottom.
 Keywords
skewed bridge;pier-deck connection;single pier;nonlinear time history;combined loading;torsion;fixed bearing;sliding bearing;shear key;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
AASHTO (2012), AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

2.
Akbari, R. and Maalek, Sh. (2010), "Adequacy of the seismic analysis method for single-column-bent viaducts considering regularity and higher modes effects", J. Vib. Control, 16(6), 827-852. crossref(new window)

3.
Attarchain, N., Kalantari, A. and Moghaddam, A.S. (2013), "Cyclic behavior modeling of rectangular RC bridge piers using OpenSees", Proceedings of the: 4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, COMPDYN 2013. Kos Island, Greece.

4.
Aviram, A., Mackie, K.R. and Stojadinovic, B. (2008), Guidelines for Nonlinear Analysis of Bridge Structures in California, PEER Report. 2008/03.

5.
Baker, J.W., Lin, T., Shahi, S.K. and Jayaram, N. (2011), New Ground Motion Selection Procedures and Selected Motions for the PEER Transportation Research Program, PEER Report 2011/03.

6.
Bhagwat, M., Sasmal, S., Novak, B. and Upadhyay, A. (2011), "Investigations on seismic response of two span cable-stayed bridges", Earthq. Struct., 2(4), 337-356. crossref(new window)

7.
Caltrans SDC, (2010), Caltrans seismic design criteria version 1.6, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento.

8.
Casarotti, Ch. and Pinho, R. (2006), "Seismic response of continuous span bridges through fiber-based finite element analysis", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 5(1), 119-131. crossref(new window)

9.
CEN European Committee for Normalization, Eurocode 8 (2004), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 1, general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, EN 1998-1.

10.
CEN European Committee for Normalization, Eurocode 2 (2004), Design of concrete structures-Part 1-1, general rules and rules for buildings, EN 1992-1-1.

11.
CEN European Committee for Normalization, Eurocode 8 (2005), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 2, Bridges, EN 1998-2.

12.
Elnashai, A.S., Gencturk, B., Kwon, O.S., Al-Qadi, I., Hashash, Y., Roesler, J.R., Kim, S.J., Jeong, S.H., Dukes, J. and Valdivia, A. (2010), "The Maule (Chile) Earthquake of February 27, 2010, consequence assessment and case studies", MAE Center, Report No. 10-04, 208.

13.
Ghobarah, A.A. and Tso, W.K. (1974), "Seismic analysis of skewed highway bridges with intermediate supports", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 2(3), 235-248.

14.
Ijima, K., Obiya, H., Aramaki, G. and Kawasaki, N. (2001) "A study on preventing the fall of skew and curved bridge decks by using rubber bearings", Struct. Eng. Mech., 12(4), 347-362. crossref(new window)

15.
Isakovi'C, T., Lazaro, M. and Fischinger, M. (2008), "Applicability of pushover methods for the seismic analysis of single column bent viaducts", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(8), 1185-1202. crossref(new window)

16.
Kalantari, A. and Amjadian, M. (2010), "An approximate method for dynamic analysis of skewed highway bridges with continuous rigid deck", Eng. Struct., 32(9), 2850-2860. crossref(new window)

17.
Kappos, A.J., Manolis, G.D. and Moschonas, I.F. (2002), "Seismic Assessment and design of R/C bridges with irregular configuration, including SSI effects", Eng. Struct., 24(10), 1337-1348. crossref(new window)

18.
Kaviani, P., Zareian, F. and Taciroglu, E. (2012), "Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete bridges with skew-angled seat-type abutments", Eng. Struct., 45, 137-150. crossref(new window)

19.
Kawashima, K., Takahashi, Y., Ge, H., Wu, Z. and Zhang, J. (2009), "Reconnaissance report on damage of bridges in 2008 Wenchuan, China, Earthquake", J. Earthq. Eng., 13(7), 965-996. crossref(new window)

20.
Mackie, K.R. and Stojadinovic, B. (2005), Fragility Basis for California Highway Overpass Bridge Seismic Decision Making, PEER Report. 2005/12.

21.
Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1988), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 114(8), 1804-1826. crossref(new window)

22.
Menegotto, M. and Pinto, P.E. (1973), "Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R.C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending", Symposium on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland. Lisbon: IABSE Report, Vol.13, Final Report, 15-22.

23.
Meng, J.Y. and Lui, E.M. (2000), "Seismic analysis and assessment of a skew highway bridge", Eng. Struct., 22(11), 1433-1452. crossref(new window)

24.
Mohti, A.A. and Pekcan, G. (2008), "Seismic response of skewed RC box-girder bridges", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 7(4), 415-426. crossref(new window)

25.
Olmos, B.A. and Roesset, J.M. (2010), "Effects of the nonlinear behavior of lead-rubber bearings on the seismic response of bridges", Earthq. Struct., 1(2), 215-230. crossref(new window)

26.
OpenSees (2008), OpenSees Development Team, Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulations, Version 2.3.0. Available from: http://opensees.berkeley.edu.

27.
Pinto, A.V., Verzeletti, G., Pegon, P., Magonetto, G., Negro, P. and Guedes, J. (1996), Pseudo-Dynamic and shaking table tests on RC bridges ECOEST-PrEC8, Report No.5, Brussels.

28.
Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2007), Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS PRESS, Pavia, Italy.

29.
Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F. and Calvi, G.M. (1996), Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, New York, NY, Wiley.

30.
Priestley, M.J.N., Verma, R. and Xiao, Y. (1994), "Seismic shear strength of reinforced concrete columns", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 120(8), 2310-2329. crossref(new window)

31.
Qiang, H., Xiuli, D., Zhou, Y. and Lee, G.C. (2013), "Experimental study of hollow rectangular bridge column performance under vertical and cyclically bilateral loads", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 12(3), 433-445. crossref(new window)

32.
Qiang, H., Yulong, Z., Xiuli, D., Chao, H. and George, C.L. (2014), "Experimental and numerical studies on seismic performance of hollow RC bridge columns", Earthq. Struct., 7(3), 251-265. crossref(new window)

33.
Ramanathan, K., Jeon, J.S., Zakeri, B., DesRoches, R. and Padgett, J.E. (2015), "Seismic response prediction and modeling considerations for curved and skewed concrete box-girder bridges", Earthq. Struct., 9(6), 1153-1179. crossref(new window)

34.
Sadrossadat, Z.M. and Saiidi, S. (2007), Pre-test Analytical Studies of NEESR-SG 4-Span Bridge Model Using OpenSees. Report No. CCEER-07-3, Reno Nevada.

35.
Somerville, P.G. (2002), "Characterizing near fault ground motion for the design and evaluation of bridges", Proceedings of the Third National Seismic Conference and Workshop on Bridges and Highways, Available from: http://peer.berkeley.edu/research/peertestbeds/Hbt/PaperonNearFaultGroundMotion.pdf.

36.
Yen, Ph., Chen, G., Yashinsky, M., Hashash, Y., Holub, C., Wang, K. and Guo, X. (2011a), China Earthquake Reconnaissance Report: Performance of Transportation Structures During the May 12, 2008, M7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake. The Federal Highway Administration, Publication No. FHWA-HRT-11-029 Oct, 54.

37.
Yen, Ph., Chen, G., Buckle, I., Allen, T., Alzamora, D., Jeffrey, G. and Aria, J.G. (2011b), Post earthquake Reconnaissance Report on Transportation Infrastructure Impact of the February 27, 2010, Offshore Maule Earthquake in Chile, The Federal Highway Administration, Publication No. FHWA-HRT-11-030 Oct, 218.

38.
Zhao, B. and Taucer, F. (2010), "Performance of infrastructure during the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China", J. Earthq. Eng., 14(4), 578-600. crossref(new window)

39.
Zhiqiang, W. and Lee, G.C. (2009), "A comparative study of bridge damage due to the Wenchuan, Northridge, Loma Prieta and San Fernando earthquakes", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 8(2), 251-261. crossref(new window)