JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Sensitivity analysis of probabilistic seismic behaviour of wood frame buildings
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Earthquakes and Structures
  • Volume 11, Issue 1,  2016, pp.109-127
  • Publisher : Techno-Press
  • DOI : 10.12989/eas.2016.11.1.109
 Title & Authors
Sensitivity analysis of probabilistic seismic behaviour of wood frame buildings
Gu, Jianzhong;
 Abstract
This paper examines the contribution of three sources of uncertainties to probabilistic seismic behaviour of wood frame buildings, including ground motions, intensity and seismic mass. This sensitivity analysis is performed using three methods, including the traditional method based on the conditional distributions of ground motions at given intensity measures, a method using the summation of conditional distributions at given ground motion records, and the Monte Carlo simulation. FEMA P-695 ground motions and its scaling methods are used in the analysis. Two archetype buildings are used in the sensitivity analysis, including a two-storey building and a four-storey building. The results of these analyses indicate that using data-fitting techniques to obtain probability distributions may cause some errors. Linear interpolation combined with data-fitting technique may be employed to improve the accuracy of the calculated exceeding probability. The procedures can be used to quantify the risk of wood frame buildings in seismic events and to calibrate seismic design provisions towards design code improvement.
 Keywords
earthquake engineering;probability;reliability;wood frame structures;timber;seismic effect;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Applied Technology Council (ATC) (2009), "Quantification of building seismic performance factors", FEMA P-695 report, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC.

2.
Ceccotti, A. and Foschi, R.O. (1999), "Reliability assessment of wood shear walls under earthquake excitation", Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Stochastic Mechanics, Balkema, Brookfield, Vermont.

3.
Cornell, C.A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R.O. and Foutch, D.A. (2002), "Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines", J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 526-533. crossref(new window)

4.
Ellingwood, B., Rosowsky, D., Li, Y. and Kim, J. (2004), "Fragility assessment of light-frame wood construction subjected to wind and earthquake hazards", J. Struct. Eng., 130(12), 1921-1930. crossref(new window)

5.
Filiatrault, A., Christovasilis, I., Wanitkorkul, A. and van de Lindt, J. (2010), "Experimental seismic response of a full-scale light-frame wood building", J. Struct. Eng., 136(3), 246-254. crossref(new window)

6.
Filiatrault, A. and Folz, B. (2002), "Performance-based seismic design of wood framed buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 128(1), 39-47. crossref(new window)

7.
Fischer, D., Filiatrault, A., Folz, B., Uang, C.M. and Seible, F. (2001), "Shake table tests of a two-story woodframe house", CUREE Rep. No. W-06, Task 1.1.1, Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering, Richmond, California.

8.
Folz, B. and Filiatrault, A. (2001), "Cyclic analysis of wood shear walls", J. Struct. Eng., 127(4), 433-441. crossref(new window)

9.
Folz, B. and Filiatrault, A. (2004), "Seismic analysis of woodframe structures II: model implementation and verification", J. Struct. Eng., 130(9), 1361-1370. crossref(new window)

10.
Li, Y., Yin, Y., Ellingwood, B.R. and Bulleit, W.M. (2010), "Uniform hazard versus uniform risk bases for performance-based earthquake engineering of light-frame wood construction", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(11), 1199-1217. crossref(new window)

11.
Pang, W., Rosowsky, D.V., Ellingwood, B.R. and Wang Y. (2009), "Seismic fragility analysis and retrofit of conventional residential wood-frame structures in the Central United States", J. Struct. Eng., 135(3), 262-271. crossref(new window)

12.
Pei, S., van de Lindt, J. and Popovski, M. (2012), "Approximate R-factor for cross laminated timber walls in multi-story buildings", J. Archit. Eng., 19(4), 245-255.

13.
Rosowsky, D.V. (2002), "Reliability-based seismic design of wood shear wall", J. Struct. Eng., 128(11), 1439-1453. crossref(new window)

14.
Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. crossref(new window)

15.
van de Lindt, J., Pei, S., Pryor, S.E., Shimizu, H. and Isoda, H. (2010), "Experimental seismic response of a full-scale six-story light-frame wood building", J. Struct. Eng., 136(10), 1262-1272. crossref(new window)

16.
van de Lindt, J., Rosowsky, D., Pang, W. and Pei, S. (2013), "Performance-based seismic design of midrise woodframe buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 139(8), 1294-1302. crossref(new window)

17.
Wang, C.H. and Foliente, G.C. (2006), "Seismic reliability of low-rise nonsymmetric woodframe buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 132(5), 733-744. crossref(new window)

18.
Zhang, J. and Foschi, R.O. (2004), "Performance-based design and seismic reliability analysis using designed experiments and neural networks", Prob. Eng. Mech., 19(3), 259-267. crossref(new window)