JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Vibration response of saturated sand - foundation system
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Earthquakes and Structures
  • Volume 11, Issue 1,  2016, pp.83-107
  • Publisher : Techno-Press
  • DOI : 10.12989/eas.2016.11.1.083
 Title & Authors
Vibration response of saturated sand - foundation system
Fattah, Mohammed Y.; Al-Mosawi, Mosa J.; Al-Ameri, Abbas F.I.;
 Abstract
In this study, the response and behavior of machine foundations resting on dry and saturated sand was investigated experimentally. A physical model was manufactured to simulate steady state harmonic load applied on a footing resting on sandy soil at different operating frequencies. Total of (84) physical models were performed. The parameters that were taken into consideration include loading frequency, size of footing and different soil conditions. The footing parameters are related to the size of the rectangular footing and depth of embedment. Two sizes of rectangular steel model footing were used. The footings were tested by changing all parameters at the surface and at 50 mm depth below model surface. Meanwhile, the investigated parameters of the soil condition include dry and saturated sand for two relative densities; 30 % and 80 %. The dynamic loading was applied at different operating frequencies. The response of the footing was elaborated by measuring the amplitude of displacement using the vibration meter. The response of the soil to dynamic loading includes measuring the stresses inside soil media by using piezoelectric sensors. It was concluded that the final settlement (St) of the foundation increases with increasing the amplitude of dynamic force, operating frequency and degree of saturation. Meanwhile, it decreases with increasing the relative density of sand, modulus of elasticity and embedding inside soils. The maximum displacement amplitude exhibits its maximum value at the resonance frequency, which is found to be about 33.34 to 41.67 Hz. In general, embedment of footing in sandy soils leads to a beneficial reduction in dynamic response (displacement and excess pore water pressure) for all soil types in different percentages accompanied by an increase in soil strength.
 Keywords
dynamic;saturated soil;machine foundation;displacement;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Analysis of seismically induced vibrations in turbo machinery foundation for different soil conditions: case study, Journal of Vibroengineering, 2017, 19, 6, 4356  crossref(new windwow)
2.
Effect of saturation on response of a single pile embedded in saturated sandy soil to vertical vibration, European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2017, 1  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Al-Homoud, A.S. and Al-Maaitah, O.N. (1996), "An experimental investigation of vertical vibration of model footings on sand", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 15(7), 431-445. crossref(new window)

2.
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2006), Standard test method for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer, ASTM D854, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

3.
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2006), Standard Test Method for Particle Size- Analysis of Soils, ASTM D422-63 (2002), West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

4.
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2006), Standard Test Method for Maximum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils Using a Vibratory Table, ASTM D4253-00 (2006), West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

5.
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2006), Standard Test Method for Minimum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils and Calculation of Relative Density, ASTM D4254-00 (2006), West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

6.
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2006), Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions, ASTM D3080-04, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

7.
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2006), Standard Test Method for Density and Unit Weight of Soil in Place by the Rubber Balloon Method, ASTM D2167-01 (2004), West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

8.
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2006), Standard Test Method for Unconsolidated- Undrained Triaxial Compression Test on Cohesive Soils, ASTM D2850-03a, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

9.
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2006), Standard Test Method for Permeability of Granular Soils (Constant Head), ASTM D2434-68, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

10.
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2006), Standard Test Method for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), ASTM D2487-06, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.

11.
Bhatia, K. (2009), Foundations for Industrial Machines: Handbook for Practicing Engineers, CRC.

12.
Boumekik, A., Belhadj-Mostefa, S. and Meribout, F. (2010), "Experimental analysis of the dynamic stress distribution at the soil foundation interface", Asian J. Civ. Eng. (Building and Housing), 11(5), 575-583.

13.
Chowdhury, I. and Dasgupta, S.P. (2010), Dynamics of Structure and Foundations-A Unified Approach: 2. Applications, CRC Press.

14.
Christian, J.T. and Hall, J.R. (1982), "Soil-structure interaction problems", Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Numerical Methods in Geotnechanics, Edmonton, Canada.

15.
Fattah, M.Y., Salman, F.A. and Nareeman, B.J. (2011), "Numerical simulation of triaxial test in clayey soil using different constitutive relations", Adv. Mater. Res., 243-249, 2973-2977, Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland. crossref(new window)

16.
Fattah, M.Y., Al-Neami, M.A. and Jajjawi, N.H. (2013), "Prediction of liquefaction potential and pore water pressure beneath machine foundations", Central Eur. J. Eng., 4(3), 226-249.

17.
Han, Y. (2010), "Dynamic analysis for foundation of vibrating equipment considering soil-structure interaction", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., Geotechnical Special Publication No. 201, ASCE, 71-76.

18.
Livaoglu, R. and Dogangun, A. (2007), "Effect of foundation embedment on seismic behavior of elevated tanks considering fluid-structure-soil interaction", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 27(9), 855-863. crossref(new window)

19.
Lu, X. and Cui, P. (2004), "The liquefaction and displacement of highly saturated sand under water pressure oscillation", Ocean Eng., 31(7), 795-811. crossref(new window)

20.
Manyyear Technology Company Ltd. (2010), www.manyyear.com.

21.
Messioud, S., Sbartai, B. and Dias, D. (2016), "Seismic response of a rigid foundation embedded in a viscoelastic soil by taking into account the soil-foundation interaction", Struct. Eng. Mech., 58(5), 887-903. crossref(new window)

22.
Omidvar, M., Iskander, M. and Bless, S. (2012), "Stress-strain behavior of sand at high strain rates", Int. J. Impact Eng., 49, 192-213. crossref(new window)

23.
Piezo Film Sensors Technical Manual (2008), Measurement Specialties, Inc., www.meas-spec.com

24.
Ramesh, H.N. and Kumar. M.T. (2011), "Concepts and problems in the design of foundations subjected to vibrations", Int. J. Geomech., ASCE, 312-321.

25.
Xiaobing, L., Qingming, T., Cheng, C., Shanbing, Y. and Peng, C. (2004), "Liquefaction and displacement of saturated sand under vertical vibration loading", Acta Mechanica Sinica, 20(1), 96-105. crossref(new window)