Comparison of Track Recording with Surveying in Track irregularity Measurement

궤도틀림의 검측값과 측량결과 비교

  • 이지하 (한국철도기술연구원, 궤도토목연구본부) ;
  • 최일윤 (한국철도기술연구원, 궤도토목연구본부) ;
  • 김박진 (서울메트로, 철도토목팀)
  • Published : 2008.11.13

Abstract

Track geometry changes by traffic loads. The bigger the changes are, the worse the riding comfort and running stability of train. This is so-called track irregularity and is the most important quality parameters of ballasted track. To objectively assess track irregularity, track geometry should be able to be measured. Practically, railway companies use moving chord method, which determine versine values via a chord. The versine is the vertical distance to curve measured in the middle of the chord. This type of method measures only versine of track irregularity curve by transfer function from the characteristics of measuring device. In this report, review the characteristics of two types of measuring tools by comparing the measurements. The one is GRP-1000 system, optical surveying system with Total station and lazar prism trolley. This calculates track geometry by surveying absolute coordinates of two points each on both rail heads. The other is EM-120, measures versine with 10m of symmetrical chord length.