DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of STS Contents in the High School Chemistry(II) Textbook

화학II 교과서의 STS 내용 분석

  • Kim, Jung-Tae (KumJung High School) ;
  • Kim, Yun-Hi (Research Institute of Industrial Technology, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Moon, Seong-Bae (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
  • 김정태 (부산 금정고등학교) ;
  • 김윤희 (경상대학교 생산기술연구소) ;
  • 문성배 (부산대학교 사범대학 화학교육과)
  • Published : 2002.02.20

Abstract

The STS contents, emphasized in the 6th curriculum, in the chemistry textbooks(II) were analyzed. The STS contents in textbooks showed average value of 2.7%. The chapter of ‘chemical bond and compound' were included 3.8% of STS contents. And the chapter of ‘atomic structure and periodic table', ‘state of material and solution', ‘science of material', and ‘chemical reaction' contained 3.2%, 2.2%, 1.9%, and 1.9% of STS contents, respectively. When the STS contents were analyzed by STS topics of Piel, the results are as follows; 33.7% on effect of technological developments, 27.5% on environmental quality and utilization of natural source, 19.6% on human engineering, 13.8% on energy, and 5.4% on sociality of science. However, there were no topics on population, space research and national defense. When the STS contents were analyzed by student activities of SATIS, most of the activities were research and case study. There were few field activities of practical investigation, problem solving and decision making, research design and stimulation. There were no activities of role play.

References

  1. 강순자; 최명희; 이정아 한국생물교육학회지 1994, 11, 225.
  2. 송진웅; 박승제; 장경애 한국과학교육학회지 1992, 12, 109.
  3. 백성혜 서울대학교 박사학위논문 1991.
  4. 백성혜 과학교육공동세미나 및 학술발표회 1992, 38.
  5. 권재술 한국과학교육학회지 1991, 11(1), 117.
  6. Yager, R. E. School Science and Mathematics 1988, 88(3), 694.
  7. Yager, R. E. Iowa Science Teacher Journal 1990, 27(1). 2.
  8. Yager, R. E. The American Biology Teacher 1992, 54(6), 349. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449509
  9. 한국교육개발원 1992. 1.
  10. 허명 새교육 1991, 91(9), 8.
  11. 허명 한국학술진흥재단 연구보고서 1993, 1.
  12. 허명 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 교과교육연구, 1994, 3, 189.
  13. 하미경 한국과학교육학회지 1991, 11(2), 79.
  14. 조정일 한국과학교육학회지 1991, 11(2), 87.
  15. 최병순 한국과학기술단체총연합회 1992, 50.
  16. 김현재 한국초등과학학회 1992, 11(1), 16.
  17. 권용주 과학교육, 1992, 339, 66.
  18. 정완호; 권용주; 김영신 한국과학교육학회지, 1993, 13(1), 66.
  19. 김윤희; 권효진; 문정배 대한화학회지 1999, 43(3), 321.
  20. 최인영; 김윤희; 문성배 대한화학회지 2001, 45(2), 162.
  21. 김윤희; 문성배 한국과학교육학회지 2000, 20(2), 274.
  22. Piel, E. J. What Research Say to the Science Teacher; Washington D.C, National Science Teachers Association, 1981.
  23. 최경희 한국과학교육학회지 1994, 14(2), 192.
  24. Bybee, R. W. Science Education 1987, 71(5), 667. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730710504
  25. NSTA An NSTA Position Statement, NSTA; Washington, D.C., 1982.