Journal of the Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회지)

Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Students’ Thought Patterns on Problem and Problem Solving in the Course of General Chemistry

일반화학을 수강하는 학생들의 문제 및 문제해결에 대한 사고유형

  • 이선경 (단국대학교 사범대학 과학교육학부) ;
  • 박현주 (조선대학교 사범대학 과학교육학부)
  • Published : 2002.12.20

Abstract

This study was to explore students' thought patterns on problem and problem solving in the course of general chemistry. The participants were 9 students taking the course of general chemistry in a university in Seoul. Data were collected from various sources; three individual interviews, classroom observations, and essays written by students.Data were all transcribed and then analyzed circularly in constant component analysis. As the results of this study, six thought patterns of students in the context of learning general chemistry were presented. These thought patterns were common and existed important component within most of students' conceptual ecologies about learning chemistry. Implications of chemistry and science learning related to this results were discussed.

Keywords

Conceptual Change;Conceptual Ecology;Conception;Thought Pattern

File

Download PDF

References

  1. Demasters, S. S.; Good, R. G.; Peebles, P. Science Education,1995, 79, 637-666. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790605
  2. Noh, T.; Scharmann, L. C. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching 1997, 34, 199. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<199::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-O
  3. Hewson, P. W.; Tabachnick, B. R.; Zeichner, K. M.; Blomker,K. B.; Meyer, H.; Lemberger, J.; Marion, R.; Park, H.; Toolin,R. Science Education, 1999, 83, 247-273. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199905)83:3<247::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-C
  4. von Glasersfeld, E. Syntheses, 1989, 80, 121-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869951
  5. Noh, T. H.; Jeon, K. M. Chemical Education 1996, 23, 102.
  6. Jeon, K. M.; Seo, K. H.; Noh, T. H. Journal of theKorean Chemical Society 2001, 45, 370.
  7. Thorley, N. R. The role of the conceptual change modelin the interpretation classroom interactions; Universityof Wisconsin-Madison: Wisconsin-Madison, U.S.A. 1990.
  8. Tingle, J. B.; Good, R. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching 1990, 27, 671. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270707
  9. Bunce, D. M.; Gable, D. L.; Samuel, J. V. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching 1991, 28, 505. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280605
  10. Eylon, B.-S.; Linn, M. C. Review of EducationalResearch, 1988, 58, 251-301. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058003251
  11. Noh, T. H.; Jeon, K. M.; Han, I. O.; Kim, C. M. J. of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 1996, 16, 389.
  12. Pintrich, P. R.; Max, W. M.; Boyle, R. A. Review ofEducational Research, 1993, 63, 167-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063002167
  13. Strike, K. A.; Posner, G. J. In Philosophy of science,cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice;Duschl, R. A.; Hamilton, R. J., Eds.; State Universityof New York Press: New York, U.S.A., 1992.147-176.
  14. Hewson, M. G. A'B. European Journal of Science Education,1984, 6, 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528840060306
  15. Hesse, J. J.; Anderson, C. W. Journal of Research inScience Teaching. 1992, 29, 277-299. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290307
  16. Tyson, L. M.; Venville, G. J.; Harrison, A. G. ScienceEducation, 1997, 81, 387-403. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199707)81:4<387::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-8
  17. Hewson, et al. National Association For Research in Science Teaching. 156. 2002.
  18. Posner, G. J.; Strike, K. A.; Hewson, P. W.; Gertzog, W.A. Science Education, 1982, 66, 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207