Verbal Interaction in Paired Think-Aloud Problem Solving; Comparison of the Characteristics of Small Groups Based on Achievement

해결자·청취자 활동에서의 언어적 상호작용: 성취도에 의한 소집단별 특성 비교

  • Taehee Noh (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hunsik Kang (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kyungmoon Jeon (Department of Science Education, Gwangju National University of Education)
  • 노태희 (서울대학교 화학교육과) ;
  • 강훈식 (서울대학교 화학교육과) ;
  • 전경문 (광주교육대학교 과학교육과)
  • Published : 2003.10.20


This study investigated the characteristics of verbal interactions of various small groups based on previous achievement in paired think-aloud problem solving. Two classes of a high school were assigned to the homogeneous and heterogeneous groups, and taught on chemistry. Students from homogeneous groups (high${\cdot}$high, mid?id) and heterogeneous groups (high${\cdot}$mid, high${\cdot}$low) were selected, and their algorithmic problem solving on chemical equation and stoichiometry were audio/video taped. In high${\cdot}$high group, solver's 'require agreement' and listener 'agree' were frequently exhibited. On the other hands, listener's 'point out' and solver's 'modify' were frequently exhibited in mid${\cdot}$mid group, which was also observed in the heterogeneous groups (high${\cdot}$mid, high${\cdot}$low). Many verbal interactions were analyzed to be in symmetrical type. In this type, 'require agreement-agree' of high${\cdot}$high group was the most frequent. 'problem solving-agree' of high${\cdot}$high group was the most frequent in the solver-dominant type, while 'point out-modify' of high${\cdot}$low group in the listener-dominant type. The verbal behaviors related to the solving stage were frequently observed, but there were few related to the reviewing stage.


  1. 전경문; 여경희; 노태희 대한화학회지 2000, 44, 356.
  2. Webb, N. M. Journal of Educational Psychology 1982, 74, 642.
  3. 노태희; 한재영; 서인호; 전경문; 차정호 한국과학교육학회지 2000, 20, 43.
  4. 권재술; 이성왕 한국과학교육학회지 1988, 8, 43.
  5. 노태희; 성을선; 정영선; 강석진 한국과학교육학회지 제출중.
  6. Narode, R.; Heiman, M.; Lochhead, J.; Slomianko, J. Teaching Thinking Skills: Science; National Education Association: Washington, DC, 1987.
  7. Pestel, B. C. Science Education 1993, 77, 83.
  8. 전경문; 노태희 한국과학교육학회지 2002, 22, 411.
  9. 전경문; 노태희 한국과학교육학회지 2000, 20, 624.
  10. Dorman, N. H. The effects of a problem-solving course on secondary school students' analytical skills, reasoning ability and scholastic aptitude; Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland College Park, 1990.
  11. Whimbey, A; Lochhead, J. Problem solving and comprehension; Lawren Erlbaum Associated: Hilsdale, 1986.
  12. Okebukola, P. A.; Ogunniyi, M. B. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1984, 21, 875.
  13. 노태희; 서인호; 한재영; 전경문; 차정호 한국과학교육학회지 2000, 20, 174.
  14. 노태희; 전경문; 한인옥; 김창민 한국과학교육학회지 1996, 16, 389.
  15. Huffman, D. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1997, 34, 551.<551::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-M
  16. Stewart, J.; Hafner, R. Science Education 1991, 75, 105.
  17. Haney, A. E. Problem-solving behavior of cooperative pairs in a fifth-grade mathematics class; Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1994.
  18. Hooper, S.; Hannafin, M. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1988, 4, 413.
  19. Linchevski, L.; Kutscher, B. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1998, 29, 533.
  20. Glass, A. R. The effects of thinking aloud pair problem solving on technology education students' thinking processes, procedures, and problem solutions (pair problemsolving); Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minesota, 1992.
  21. Weiss, C. A. Learning to think thinking to learn: Improving college students' thinking through pair problemsolving; Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1990.
  22. Nattiv, A. Elementary School Journal 1994, 94, 285.
  23. 한국과학교육학회지 v.16 노태희;전경문;한인옥;김창민
  24. Journal of Research in Science Teaching v.34 Huffman, D.<551::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-M