DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shape Optimization of a CRT based on Response Surface and Kriging Metamodels

반응표면과 크리깅메타모델을 이용한 CRT 형상최적설계

  • 이태희 (한양대학교 기계공학부) ;
  • 이창진 (한양대학교 대학원 기계설계학과) ;
  • 이광기 (한양대학교 대학원 기계설계학과)
  • Published : 2003.03.01

Abstract

Gradually engineering designers are determined based on computer simulations. Modeling of the computer simulation however is too expensive and time consuming in a complicate system. Thus, designers often use approximation models called metamodels, which represent approximately the relations between design and response variables. There arc general metamodels such as response surface model and kriging metamodel. Response surface model is easy to obtain and provides explicit function. but it is not suitable for highly nonlinear and large scaled problems. For complicate case, we may use kriging model that employs an interpolation scheme developed in the fields of spatial statistics and geostatistics. This class of into interpolating model has flexibility to model response data with multiple local extreme. In this study. metamodeling techniques are adopted to carry out the shape optimization of a funnel of Cathode Ray Tube. which finds the shape minimizing the local maximum principal stress Optimum designs using two metamodels are compared and proper metamodel is recommended based on this research.

Keywords

Metamodel;Response Surface Model;Kriging metamodel;CRT;Shape Optimization

References

  1. Lee, T.H., Lee, K.K. and Lee, K.S., 2002, 'Multi-criteria Shape Optimization of a Funnel in Cathode Ray Tubes using Response Surface Model,' Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization, accepted https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0478-9
  2. ANSYS Inc. 2000, ANSYS User's Guide. Ver.5.6
  3. Phoenix Integration Inc. 2000, ModelCenter User's Guide. Ver. 3.1
  4. Simpson, T.W., Mauery, T.M., Korte, J.J. and Mistree, F., 1998, 'Comparison of Response Surface and Kriging Models for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization,' 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization, Vol. 1, pp. 381-391
  5. Ryu, J.S. , Kim, M.S., Cha, K.J., Lee, T.H. and Choi, D.H., 2002, 'Kriging Interpolation Method for Geostatics and DACE Model,' KSME International Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 619-632 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03184811
  6. Sacks, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, T.J. and Wynn, H.P., 1989, 'Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments,' Statistical Science, Vol. 4, No.4, 409-435 https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177012413
  7. Giunta, A.A. and Watson, L.T, 1998, 'A Comparison of Approximation Modeling Techniques: Polynomial Versus Interpolating Models,' 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization, Vol. 1, pp. 392-404
  8. Cressie, N. A. C., 1993, Statistics for Spatial Data, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Ch 2 and Ch 3
  9. Burrough, P.A. and Mcdonnell, R.A., 1998, Principles of Geographical Information Systems, OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, Ch 6

Cited by

  1. RBDO of Coil Spring Considering Transversal Direction Mode Tracking vol.37, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2013.37.6.821
  2. Statistical Space-Time Metamodels Based on Multiple Responses Approach for Time-Variant Dynamic Response of Structures vol.34, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2010.34.8.989